Professional Responsibility Flashcards
Attorney’s Fees
A lawyer cannot charge excessive fees, only reasonable fees based on time skill, complexity of the case, and customary fee in the area are permitted.
Fees and expenses charged by an attorney must be reasonable.
- Reasonable means not excessive. As a rule of thumb, any fee of greater than 50% is excessive and unreasonable.
- Factors to assess reasonableness include lawyer’s reputation and experience, complexity of the case, the potential affect of the case on the lawyer’s business.
Fees and expenses must be clearly communicated to the client before or within a reasonable time after teh representation commences.
- Oral agreement is permitted, but writing is preferred.
- There is a duty to revise if necessary
Contingent Fees
A contingent fee is based in whole or in part on success.
Contingent fees are not permitted in criminal and family law cases.
- Contingent fee agreement must be in writing and signed by the client. Must state:
- the method by which the contingent fee will be determined
- the percentage, if fee is based on percentage
- what expenses will be deducted from recovery
- whether percentages will be calculated before or after expenses
- At the conclusion of the representation, the lawyer must give a written statement of the final outcome and a financial accounting.
Collection/Payment of Fees
Fees may be paid:
- before, during, or after the representation
- by cash, credit, real property, retainer, installment payments
- lawyer may accept real or personal property as payment, but note that this may be a prohibited business transaction with client or violation of rules prohibiting acquisition of proprietary interest in cause of action.
If there is a dispute over fees, lawyer should first use arbitration or mediation. A suit to collect fees should be filed only to prevent fraud or gross imposition by client.
Division of Legal Fees
Lawyers who are not in the same firm/business may divide a fee if:
- the division is in proportion to the services performed oor each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation.
- the client agrees to the joint representation and the agreement is confirmed in writing; and
- the total fee is reasonable.
Sharing fees with non-lawyers is prohibited except that a court awarded fee may be shared with a non-profit.
Duties Owed to the Client
A lawyer must be C….COILED, like a stuttering snake.
- Confidentiality
- Competence
- Objectives (like duty of obedience)
- Information/Communication
- Loyalty (avoid conflicts of interest)
- End of Representation
- Diligence
Duty of Competence
Lawyer must act with sufficient legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation.
Exam sparks: new lawyer, inexperienced lawyer, lawyer doing stupid things, lawyer giving bad advice=competence.
Objectives: Scope of Representation & Decision-Making
The client determines the objectives (ends) of the representation. The lawyer must obey client’s instructions as to ends unless repugnant or illegal.
- Lawyer can and should consult with client about her objectives.
- It is okay to limit objectives/scope with informed consent (e.g., lawyer agrees to handle trial but not appeal).
- The lawyer cannot counsel or assist client in commission of crime or fraud.
The lawyer determines the means to accomplish objectives.
- Lawyer can and should consult with client about means.
Decisions Specifically Allocated to the Client
The client has the final say on T-POT decisions:
- Trial–choosing a jury or bench trial
- Plea–whether to plead guilty (criminal) or settle (civil)
- Objectives of the representation
- Testify–whether to testify in a criminal case
Clients w/ Diminished Capacity
Lawyer should allow client to make as many decisions as she is able, and if deciding for a client, lawyer must act in client’s best interest.
- Can seek appointment of a guardian to make decisions for client.
Duty of Information/Communication
Lawyer _must _keep client reasonably informed.
- Reasonably informed means that the lawyer must provide sufficient information to enable client “to participate intelligently in decisions.”
Lawyer must give reasonably prompt response to client requests for information, documents, etc.
Duty of Diligence
Lawyer has a duty to act with diligence in representation of client.
- The rule is about timing: avoiding unreasonable delays that can hurt clients.
- Exam spark: slow lawyers=diligence
Duty of Confidentiality
A lawyer must not disclose confidential information obtained from the client with limited exceptions.
- Confidential–depends on reasonable intent/expectations of client.
- Generally presence of a third party destroys confidentiality.
- Third person will not destroy confidentiality if client reasonably intends/expects confidentiality (e.g., lawyer’s clerk, expert, investigator, co-counsel).
- Where lawyer invites client’s close friend to join meeting to have a “calming effect” on client, confidentiality was not destroyed. Newman v. State.
The duty of confidentiality lasts forever, even after client’s death, unless waived by client.
Mandatory Exceptions to Confidentiality: Trial Fraud
Trial Fraud. When a lawyer knows of past or future false statements or fraud in litigation, the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures.
- Must involve an official adjudicative proceeding (civil, criminal, administrative hearing)
- Duty ends at the end of the proceedings.
- Actual knowledge is required–lawyer must know of falsity or testimony offered.
- Lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures to rectify/prevent fraud:
- discourage or refuse to offer false evidence;
- disaffirm false statements by lawyer
- withdraw, if it will remedy the falsity
- disclose client confidences if and only to the extent necessary.
- MD: disclosure is discretionary, not mandatory, for perjury by criminal defendant if constitutional rights might be jeopardized.
Mandatory Exceptions to Confidentiality: Future Fraud
A lawyer must disclose confidential information if necessary to avoid assisting a client who is committing (not completed, currently committing) or is going to commit (in the future) a crime or fraud against a third person.
Lawyer must:
- dissuade the client from the fraudulent or criminal plan and have the client correct any misstatements;
- withdraw from representation;
- give notice of the fact of withdrawal and disaffirm any opinion, document, affirmation, or the like; or
- in extreme cases, disclose confidential information relating to representation and correct or withdraw a statement if it is the only way to avoid assisting a client’s crime or fraud.
Only applies when client is seeking advice or aid in furtherance of a crime or fraud.
Discretionary Exception to Confidentiality
A lawyer may disclose client confidences:
- to seek advice about compliance with the rules of professional conduct
- in suits between lawyer and client (suit to collect fees/malpractice suits)
- perjury by criminal defendant as part of criminal trial
- to prevent the highest authority of an organization from doing injury to the organization where organization is the client
- with the client’s actual authority (express waiver, informed consent) or implied authority (lawyer may disclose information to her staff or others in firm unless client directs otherwise)
- to disclose information to opposing counsel, to the court, or others if those relevations will benefit or further the client’s case
Discretionary Exceptions to Confidentiality: Crimes & Frauds
A lawyer may disclose confidences to:
- prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm
- prevent client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client used or is using the lawyer’s services.
- prevent, mitigate, or rectify substantial injury to the financial or property interests of another that is reasonably certain to result or has resulted from the client’s commission of a crime or fraud in futherance of which the client used the lawyer’s services.
Duty of Loyalty: Conflict of Interests
A lawyer cannot permit other interests to interfere with her duty to client.
General approach:
- Identify the client or clients
- Determine if conflict of interest exists
- is the conflict consentable?
- If consentable, obtain informed consent, confirmed in writing from each affected client
Exam sparks: lawyer in fact pattern; multiple people seek representation; one client wearing two hats; organizational client.
Identifying Conflicts
A conflict exists where:
- The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another; or
- Directly adverse–lawyer represents one client against another (even in wholly unrelated matter).
- There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsbilities to another client, a former client or third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
- Material limitation–a signficant risk that a lawyer’s ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer’s other responsbilities.
** Consentable Conflicts**
A conflict is consentable if the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client, despite the conflict
- The test is actual (subjective) and reasonable (objective).
- If directly adverse, the test usually CANNOT be met.
If not consentable, lawyer cannot represent even if client consents.
If consentable, the lawyer must obtain informed consent, confirmed in writing, from each affected client.
This analysis applies to all conflicts, including conflicts between lawyer’s personal interests, current clients, and third parties (ex: lawyer’s duty to a third person as a trustee, executor, or corporate director).
If you learn confidential information from two clients before learning that there is a directly adverse conflict, you will have to withdraw from representing both clients—the objective test cannot be met. How can you not use information against the other?
Non-Consentable Conflicts
Some conflicts are so problematic, that even if client gives informed consent, the lawyer must nonetheless decline representation:
- representation prohibited by law (ex: state statutes prohibiting joint representation in criminal cases)
- the representation involves the assert of one client against another client in the same litigation or proceeding before a tribunal.
- mediation is not a tribunal
Conflicts: Former Client’s Interests v. Client’s
Where lawyer formerly represented a client, the lawyer may not represent a new person in the same or substantially related matter in which the new person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client, unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
- Substantially related if involve the same transaction; the same legal dispute; **or a substantial risk that confidential factual information obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the new client’s position. **
- Ex: lawyer drafted a contract for A. Can’t later sue A to rescind contract on behalf of B.
- Ex: Lawyer represented husband’s business and learned financial information about husband. Can’t represent wife in divorce.
- Ex: Lawyer defended company in vehicle tort. Later, lawyer CAN sue company in different vehicle tort.
Conflicts: Former Firm Client’s Interests vs. Current Client
If the lawyer did not personally represent client while with the firm, and did not learn any confidential client information, no conflict exists. Conflict exists only where lawyer actually learned confidential information about former firm’s client.
- If there is a conflict, the usual rules apply–reasonable belief/informed consent.
Use of Client’s Confidential Information
A laywer cannot use confidential information related to former client’s representation to former client’s disadvantage, unless former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing, or the information has become generally known.
A lawyer cannot use client information to disadvantage any client, absent informed consent.
Prospective Client Interests vs. Client Interests
A lawyer shall not represent a client with interests materially adverse to those of a prospective client in the same or a substantially related matter, if the lawyer received significantly harmful information from the prospective client unless:
- both prospective client and the affected new client give informed consent, confirmed in writing.
A prospective client is a person who discusses with a lawyer the possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship, even if lawyer is never retained.
If lawyer is part of firm, the knowledge of confidential info is imputed to firm, unless informed consent, confirmed in writing, of both the prospective and affected clients or the disqualified lawyer is screened
Imputed Conflicts: General Rule
The general rule is that a conflict for one lawyer in a firm is a conflict for all. The rule does not apply:
- to non-lawyers in a firm.
- to knowledge obtained by the lawyer before she became a lawyer.
- where the conflict arises from a personal interest of the lawyer and does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client by remaining lawyers in the firm.
- where the affected clients waive the conflict (apply reasonable belief & informed consent rule).