Professional Responsibilities Flashcards
What engagements are covered by the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct?
- AICPA Code of Professional Conduct outlines the profession’s rules of conduct and auditor’s responsibility to the profession
- Covers all professional engagements and is the minimum standard of conduct
- Member should additionally follow specific standards for a specific engagement
- codified using ET prefixes
- PCAOB adopt the AICPA code of professional conduct
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct - Principles
- Article I - Responsibilities
- Article II - Public Interest
- Article III - Integrity
- Arctile IV - Objectivity and Independence
- Article V - Due Care
- Article VI - Scope and Nature of service
What are threats (7) and safeguards (3) to independence?
_Threats _to independence:
(a) Self-review threat—Reviewing evidence that results from the member’s own work (e.g., preparing source documents for an audit client).
(b) Advocacy threat—Actions promoting the client’s interests or position (e.g., promoting a client’s securities).
(c) Adverse interest threat—Actions or interests between the member and the client that are in opposition (e.g., litigation between the client and the member).
(d) Familiarity threat—Members having a close or longstanding relationship with client or knowing individuals or entities who performed nonattest services for the client, (e.g., a member of the attest engagement team whose spouse is in a key position at the client).
(e) Undue influence threat—Attempts by a client’s management (or others) to coerce the member or exercise excessive influence over the member (e.g., threat to replace the member over a disagreement regarding an accounting principle).
(f) Financial self-interest threat—Potential benefit to a member from a financial interest in, or some financial relationship with, an attest client (e.g., having a direct financial interest in the client).
(g) Management participation threat—Assuming the role of management or performing management functions
for the attest client (e.g., serving as an officer of the client).
- *Safeguards of Independence**
(a) **created by the profession, legislation, or regulation **(e.g., required continuing education on independence and ethics).
(b) implemented by the client (e.g., an effective governance structure, including an active audit committee).
(c) implemented by the firm/cpa (e.g., quality controls for attest engagements)
Threats > Safeguards ⇒ No Independence
Independence
attestation engagement - ERA’s
- Auditor must maintain independent for attestation engagement (ERA’S): Audit/Examination; Review; Agreed-upon procedure engagements leading to findings; Special reports
- NO independent for compilation, taxes and consultation
- Independence should be maintained in both fact and appearance
- Independence is not impair for indirect** and immaterial financial interest** (e.g. an investment held through a regulated mutual fund) **
What are the requirements for Non-attest engagements?
- Agreement must be in writing
- Independence not required - Must state if you are not independent
When are contingent fees NOT allowed?
- ET section 302 - code of profesional conduct
- Not allowed if Member also performs services where independence is required, attest work (1) audit or review of financial statements, (2) compilation of financial statements expected to be relied upon by a third party or (3) examination of prospective financial information
- Commissions or referral fees for Covered Members are not allowed - Example - Audit firm gets a commission for recommending to Client that they implement a new A/P System…NOT Allowed
- Tax Preparation - Prepare an original or correction of original return (amended return), Payment according to refund amount is disallowed/NOT Allowed
When are contingent fees allowed?
When fees are structured relative to judicial proceedings
- Example*:
- *-** representing client in an examination by a IRS agent
- *-** filing an amended tax return subject to tax case with a different taxpayer or where the tax authority is developing a position
- Representing a taxpayer in getting a private ruling
Department of Labor (DOL)
- The DOL’s mission involves fostering and promoting the welfare of job seekers, wage earners, and retirees of the United States.
- The DOL conducts financial and performance audits following Government Auditing Standards - relating to its mission, including audits of: (1)Compliance with applicable laws and regulations (2)Evaluation of economy and efficiency of operations (3)Evaluation of effectiveness in achieving program results
- Employee benefit plans must be audited in accordance with the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as enforced by DOL. **Independence requirements are in general similar to those of the AICPA, except that **Accountant or firm may be engaged on a professional basis by the plan sponsor and the accountant may serve as an actuary.
- In some circumstances (e.g., definition of “member” for purposes of those who must maintain independence within a CPA firm) DOL requirements differ from AICPA requirements—in such cases they are generally more restrictive.
Due Care
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct - ET Section 56 - Article V–Due Care.
the principle of due care requires the member to observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards, strive continually to improve competence and the quality of services, and discharge responsibility to the best of the member’s ability.
(1) Competence is derived from both education and experience.
(2) Each member is responsible for assessing his or her own competence and for evaluating whether education, experience,
and judgment are adequate for the responsibility taken.
- Technical abilities mirror those held by peers in the profession (Education and experience)
- Follow GAAS (Generally Accepted Audit Standards)
- Obtain a Reasonable Level of Assurance
- Maintain Reasonable Level of Skepticism
- Supervise Audit Staff
- Review judgment at every level
Interpretation 101-1. - Independence is impaired if
Interpretation 101-1. Independence is impaired if
(1) During the period of the professional engagement a covered member
(a) had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client
(b) was a trustee of any trust or executor or administrator of any estate if such trust or estate had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client
(c) had a joint closely held investment that was material to the covered member.
(d) except as specifically permitted in interpretation 101-5, had any loan to or from the client, any officer or director of the client, or any individual owning 10% or more of the client’s outstanding equity securities or other ownership interests.
(2) During the period of the professional engagement, a partner or professional employee of the firm, his or her immediate family, or any group of such persons acting together owned more than 5% of a client’s outstanding equity securities or other ownership interests.
(3) During the period covered by the financial statements or during the period of the professional engagement, a partner or professional employee of the firm was simultaneously associated with the client as a
(a) Director, officer, or employee, or in any capacity equivalent to that of a member of management;
(b) Promoter, underwriter, or voting trustee; or
(c) Trustee for any pension or profit-sharing trust of the client.
Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
Employee benefit plans must be audited in accordance with the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as enforced by the Department of Labor (DOL).
For purposes of auditing these plans, the DOL has issued guidelines to determine whether the accountant is independent.
Which standards apply to consulting engagements?
Consulting engagements are covered by Statements on Standards for Consulting Services (SSCS)
General Standard Rule 201 :
• Professional Competence
• Due Professional Care
• Planning & Supervision
• Obtain Sufficient Data
• Must Serve Client Interest – with integrity & objectivity
• Must have written or oral agreement
• Must communicate with client
List some common consulting engagements.
- Advisory Services
- Transaction Services
- Implementation Services
- Consultation
- Staff and other support services
- Product services
When is a GAAP departure appropriate?
Departure from GAAP is appropriate only when GAAP would cause Financial Statements to be misleading
Departure must be explained & disclosed
Example of possible circumstance justifying departure are **New form of business and New legislation **
Confidentiality
Rule 301
- Information is considered confidential NOT privileged
-
Must not reveal information without client permission
-
Exceptions
• Valid subpoena or summons
• Inquiry by AICPA trial board
• Quality control peer review program
-
Exceptions
- A member may use a records retention agency to store client records as long as confidentiality is maintained