Products Liability Flashcards

1
Q

Re: Products Liability

What 3 theories can liability be based on?

A
  1. Negligence
  2. Warranty
  3. Strict Tort Liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Re: Products Liability

Definition of Products Liability

A

Liability of a seller of a tangible item, which because of a defect, causes injury to its purchaser, user, or sometimes bystanders.
Injury is usually a personal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Re: Products Liability

Negligent theory of Liability- What principles apply?

A
  1. Duty
  2. Breach
  3. Injury
  4. Causation
    - Ordinary principles of negligence apply when a personal injury has been caused by a CARELESSLY MANUFACTURED PRODUCT.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Re: Products Liability

Who is liable under the negligence theory?

A

The party who negligently manufactures a product is liable for any personal injuries proximate lay caused by his negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re: Products Liability

When can bystanders recover?

A

A bystander can recover if he can show that he was a foreseeable plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Re: Products Liability

List the type of defendants whom may be liable for negligence?

A

Manufactures
Retailers
Other suppliers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Re: Products Liability

In what ways could a manufacturer be liable?

A

Manu:

  • carelessly designed product
  • carelessly manufactured it
  • carelessly performed (or failed to perform) reasonable inspection and test of finished product
  • failed to package and ship the product in a reasonably safe way
  • lacked reasonable care to obtain quality components from a reasonable source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re: Products Liability

When might a retailer be liable?

A

Negligence-A retailer who sells a defective product may be, but is not usually liable in negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Re: Products Liability

What are examples of the third theory under negligence, other suppliers?

A
-Bailors of tangible property
•rental car companies
-Sellers and lessors of real estate
-Suppliers of product-related services
•hospitals performing blood transfusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Re: Products Liability

List the types of warranties.

A
  1. Implied

2. Express

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re: Products Liability

Define Express Warranty

A

When a seller expressly represent that her goods have certain qualities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Re: Products Liability

Define Breach of Warranty

A

If the goods turn out not to have the qualities, as expressly represented by the seller, the purchaser may sue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Re: Products Liability

What ways does the UCC state an express warranty may arise?

A
  1. Statement of fact or promise about the goods
  2. Description of the goods
  3. Use of a sample or model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Re: Products Liability

Is there a Privity Requirement for Breach of Express Warranty?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Re: Products Liability

What makes a breach of express warranty a strict liability?

A

As long as plaintiff can show that the representation was not a true fact, it doesn’t matter that D reasonably believed it to be true, or that defendant could not possibly have known it was untrue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Re: Products Liability

List the Types of Defects

A
  1. Manufacturing Defects
  2. Design Defect
  3. Inadequate Warnings (type of design defect)
17
Q

Re: Products Liability

Describe when there might be a manufacturing defect.

A

When a product emerges from the manufacturing process not only different from other products, but also more dangerous than it would have been had it been correctly process.

18
Q

Re: Products Liability

Describe when there might be a design defect

A

When all products of a line are made identically according to manufacturing specifications, but have dangerous propensities due to their mechanical features/packaging.

19
Q

Re: Products Liability

Describe when Inadequate Warnings can be a type of defect

A

When a product does not have clear and complete warnings of any dangers that may not be apparent to users.

20
Q

Re: Products Liability

What must the plaintiff prove to prevail under a manufacturing defect?

A

The plaintiff need to prove the product was dangerous beyond the expectation of the ordinary consumer because of a departure from its intended design.

21
Q

Re: Products Liability

Under Design Defect: List the factors considered by courts under “feasible alternative”

A
  • Usefulness and desirability of product
  • Availability of safer alternative products
  • The dangers of the product that have been identified by the time of trial
  • likelihood and probable seriousness of injury
  • obviousness of the danger
  • normal public expectation of danger
  • avoid ability of injury by care in use of product
  • feasibility of eliminating the danger without seriously impairing the product’s function or making it unduly expensive
22
Q

Re: Products Liability

Under Design Defect, what must plaintiff prove?

A

A less dangerous modification or alternative was economically feasible.

23
Q

Re: Products Liability

List two types of implied warranty

A
  1. Fitness for particular purpose

2. Merchantability

24
Q

Re: Products Liability

Define Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Person

A

A guaranty that the product is fit for a specific purpose

25
Q

Re: Products Liability

Define Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A

A guaranty that the product is fit for ordinary purposes.