Products Liability Flashcards

1
Q

What is the manufacturer’s liability in negligence?

A

Manufacturers are liable for the finished product, even if they didn’t make all of the parts. They have a duty to inspect the product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can be liable in the chain of commerce?

A

Everyone in the chain of commerce can be liable. No privity of contract since the final consumer is the foreseeable user.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What constitutes a breach of express warranty?

A

Seller is liable for breach of express warranty if:
1. Seller made a representation of a material fact.
2. Fact regarded product’s quality, performance, construction, or durability.
3. Before or at the point of sale.
4. Consumer relied on the fact
5. The falsity of the fact proximately caused injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a breach of implied warranty?

A

When a manufacturer introduces a product into the stream of commerce, there is an implied warning that the product is reasonably safe for intended use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is strict products liability?

A

If you sell or distribute a defective product, you are liable for injuries without intent or lack of reasonable care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the elements of a manufacturing defect?

A
  1. D manufactured and sold a product which was defective at the time of sale.
  2. Product was expected to and did reach the user without substantial change.
  3. Defective condition proximately caused harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What test is used to determine whether a design is defective?

A

Risk-utility analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the factors of the risk-utility analysis test?

A

Risk Utility Analysis - RAW SLAM:
R: Reasonable alternative design
A: Ability to eliminate risk without reducing utility
W: Worth/Utility
S: Severity and likelihood of injury
L: Learned ability to avoid injury
A: Anticipated awareness of risk by the user
M: Money and insurance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes a failure to adequately warn?

A

Product fails to warn of foreseeable risks of harm that could have been reduced or avoided through a warning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the elements of failure to adequately warn?

A
  1. Warn average users about risks of harm.
  2. Warn users about the severity of the harm (death).
  3. Formatted and positioned for the average user to notice and understand.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the analysis for failure to adequately warn?

A
  1. Is the danger foreseeable?
  2. If it is obvious, no duty to warn (jury question).
  3. Was the warning adequate?
  4. Was it there?
  5. Was it obscured?
  6. Was it emphasized?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does a manufacturer have to warn of obvious inherent dangers?

A

No. There is no duty to warn that fire is hot or guns shoot bullets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Good Burbon Rule?

A

A product is not defective if the danger it poses is why the product is used (guns, butter, booze, cigarettes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the state of the art defense?

A

If industry customs and scientists know of the risk, it is foreseeable. If they don’t, the risk is unknown to anyone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the significance of design improvement?

A

The fact that the design was improved is NOT evidence that the design was defective. This rule would disincentivize manufacturers to improve safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can circumstantial evidence indicate?

A

Circumstantial evidence can be used (safe products of this nature don’t regularly maim people).

17
Q

What does violation of a statute indicate?

A

Violation of a statute is evidence that a product is defective.

18
Q

What is a defense against product liability?

A

If P misuses a product in a way that the manufacturer could not foresee, they cannot recover.

19
Q

What happens if P uses a product recklessly?

A

If P doesn’t misuse a product but uses it recklessly, they may still recover under a comparative negligence standard.

20
Q

Are sellers of secondhand goods liable?

A

Sellers of secondhand goods are not liable because liability does not make the chain of manufacturing safer.

21
Q

Are hospitals liable for defective products?

A

Hospitals are not sellers of the products used in providing medical care. Unless the hospital negligently uses Temu pacemakers, they are not liable if the pacemaker is defective.

22
Q

Do drug manufacturers have a duty to warn people in doctor’s offices?

A

No. A manufacturer is not liable if they pass the warnings onto a learned intermediary (doctor)