Product Liability - Evidence and Defenses Flashcards
In a products liability action based upon strict liability, the plaintiff must prove:
1) The defendant was the manufacturer of the product;
2) The product was defective;
3) The defect existed at the time the product left the factory;
4) The defect was the direct and proximate cause of the accident and injuries.
What are the types of evidence the plaintiff may use to prove their claim?
1) Direct evidence
2) Witness Testimony
3) Circumstantial Evidence;
4) State of the Art Evidence;
5) Common Knowledge
What is the defense of contributory negligence?
Conduct by the plaintiff which is below the standard to which the plaintiff is legally required to conform for his own protection and which is a contributing cause which cooperates with the negligence of the defendant is causing the plaintiff’s harm.
Under the common law, contributory negligence barred recovery or was only a partial bar?
It was a complete bar to recovery. The only jurisdictions that still follow this are Alabama, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and D.C.
Who has the burden of proving contributory negligence?
The defendant has the burden of proving the plaintiff’s conduct rose to the level of voluntary or implied assumption of risk.
What is the last clear chance doctrine?
This doctrine permits a plaintiff in a negligence action to recover, notwithstanding their own negligence, on a showing that the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid the accident.
What is the defense of comparative fault?
There are two types, Pure and Modified. Modified also breaks down into not as great (49%) and No greater than (50%). Under this standard, the defendant’s liability will decrease by the amount of the plaintiff’s liability.
What is the Comparative Fault formula?
Plaintiff’s Recovery (R) = Total amount of damages (TD) minus the plaintiff’s percentage of fault (PF%).
PR = TD-PF%
What is the defense of misuse of product?
A product is not defective when it is safe for normal handling and consumption. If the injury results form the abnormal handling the seller is not liable.
Misuse of a product is normally a bar to strict liability.