Product liability Flashcards

1
Q

What is a product and where can the definition be found?

A

Product means any goods or electricity. S.1 (2) c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can be held liable and where can this be found?

A
  • Producer of raw material
  • Manufacturer of finished or component part
  • The importer
  • Anyone putting their name on product

Section 2.1 and 2.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

On what counts can the supplier be held responsible? Where is this found?

A
  • If P asks them to identify the persons who made it.
  • At a practical time and after P has first tried to find them themselves.
  • The supplier fails to comply or to identify the producer

Section 2.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a defect? Where is this found?

A

There is a defect in the product if the safety of the product is not such as person are entitled to expect.

section 3.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first considerations in regards to defects? 3.2 a?

A
  • The manner in which and purpose for which the product has been marketed
  • Instruction or warning about what to do or refrain from doing with product
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the second consideration? 3.2 c?

A

The time the product was supplied by one producer to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the third consideration? 3.1 b?

A

What is reasonably expected to be done with or in relation to the product is relevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case states that a product does not have to be defective to breach the expectations test?

A

Abouzaid v Mothercare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case implies that the expectation test is of low expectations?

A

Tesco stores Ltd v Pollard & Pollard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case failed to establish that the expectations test had been met by arguing that consumer were aware of the risks?

A

A v National Blood Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case states that medical products must be produced with risk-benefit consideration in mind?

A

Wilkes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Wilkes say about the expecations of public?

A

Not literally what they expect but what they are entitled to expect. Objective test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case shows that the importer will be held liable in accordance with section 2.2 c

A

Ide v ATB sales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where can defences be found?

A

Section 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the six defences?

A
  • Compliance with legal requirements
  • Uncirculated products
  • Subsequent defects
  • Non-profit activities
  • Components
  • Developmental risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case successfully used the ‘uncirculated products’ defence?

A

OB v Aventis Pasteur. The use of supply and not put into circulartion made crucial difference.

17
Q

Which case successfully applied the ‘subsequent defect’ defence by proving the product left their control without defect?

A

Piper v JRI

18
Q

Which case states that producer has to comply with most advanced knowlegde avaliable on objective analsysis?

A

Commission v UK - knoweldge might be out there but needs to be reliable.

19
Q

What is there no liability for? Section 5

A

Product less than 275

Products not intended for private use.