Product Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

first time liability in negligence of a manufacturer for damage caused by his product

A

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

common law: lack of inspection of the product- success for the claimant

A

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

common law: defect occurred outside manufacturer’s control

A

Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why was the CPA 1987 passed?

A

in response to a EU Directive of 1985

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How would yo describe liability under the CPA?

A

doesn’t depend on proof of fault; is not absolute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

blood products are covered by the Act

A

A v National Blood Authority [2001]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a product? Which section of the Act?

A

s.1(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must be proved by the claimant under s.3?

A

the safety of the product is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ‘consumer expectation test’?

A

objective standard applied to the question of defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

manufacturer failed the consumer expectation test

A

Abouzaid v Mothercare [2001]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

balancing risk and benefit- coffee must be hot, yet must be served in a safe cup

A

Bogle v McDonald’s Restaurants [2002]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

child-resistant lid achieved the customer expectation standard despite not quiet achieving the British Standard for Safety

A

Pollard v Tesco Stores [2006]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

a constellation of factors had combined to lead to the fracture of the prosthesis

A

Wilkes [2016]; Gee [2018]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What else is necessary for a liability despite proof of defect?

A

a causal link between defect and damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when is compensation not available?

A

s.5- damage to the product itself
damage to property not ordinarily intended for private use and indented by the claimant for that purpose
damage to property totaling less than £275

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the defences under the act- s.4?

A

-Defect is attributable to compliance with any EU obligation

-D did not supply the product

-Supply was not in the course of business

-Defect did not exist at the relevant time- Piper [2006]

-The development of risks defence- the producer might not have been expected to discover the defect

-Defect is wholly attributable to the design

17
Q

warnings on products may be effective in discharging liability

A

Kubach [1937]

18
Q

claimant must prove that defect is the cause of the harm

A

Foster v Biosil [2001]

19
Q

if defect did not exist at the time of supply then the manufacturer has a defence

A

Piper [2006]

20
Q

regarding the relevant state of scientific knowledge- s.4 (1) (e) CPA’s wording is in line with directive- subjective v objective discussion

A

EC Commission v UK [1997]