Process Test Flashcards

1
Q

Inert Knowledge Problem

A

or the difficulty in transferring details from one situation to the next, and it is one of the most fundamental hurdles to learning negotiation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common Mistakes in Negotiation

A

Mistake #1: Taking an Overly Narrow View of Negotiation Situations

Mistake #2: Failing to Plan

Mistake #3: The Zero-Sum Assumption

Mistake #4: Being self-serving

Mistake #5: Not Matching Influence Approach to Situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Endowment Effect

A

Overvaluing the resources that you have other party might not think they are as valuable as you do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Background participants

A

are people with the capability to directly change or affect the progression of the negotiation via their influence on the parties at the table. That is, they can start and stop negotiation, or change its direction. (manager at a car dealership)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interested Observer

A

are people who are watching the negotiation but have no way to directly change its course

can influence the negotiation because the people at the table might care how they are viewed by the interested observers

Interested observers might also notice a precedent set by the negotiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Three general ways people can be influenced

A

Reason Reward pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sources Of Power

A
Resource Power
Coercive Power
Expert Power
Referent Power
Legitimate Power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Boegy

A

– a tactic where people pretend something that costs them very little is a big concession, and then try to extract something in return from you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fractioning

A

refers to situations where current issues are split into component parts in order to find better solutions

example salary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Log Rolling

A

involves finding issues to trade where parties have opposing priorities, and trading so that each party receives a lot on their highly preferred issue, and gives a lot on their less preferred issue. Thus for logrolling to occur, there MUST be multiple issues and those issues must have DIFFERENT value to both sides. For example, let’s say we work together and come to discover that you like to have long weekends off but don’t care much about working long hours, while I can’t work long hours but don’t mind working the weekend. We therefore make a deal so that I cover your weekends and sometimes Mondays in exchange for you covering me any time I have to work a double shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Packaging Issues

A

This tactic involves making an offer with multiple issues. While logrolling is always making a packaged offer, a packaged offer does not necessarily involve logrolling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Distributive

A

The Pie can only be split and not expanded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Objective Arguments

A

Using actual data in your arguments

Actual data could be facts, figures, and statistics, anything that is defendable with non-biased information

Objective arguments are effective because they seem free from your self-serving biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Subjective Arguments

A

reside only within one person’s mind and are based on one’s perceptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gradual concession reduction tactic

A

Decreasing the concession every time you make a new offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unilateral Consessions

A

multiple concessions in a row without a concession from the other side

17
Q

Three stages of trust

A

, calculus, is a very cognitive/informational and quantitative approach to trust, in which individuals decide how much risk they are willing to expose themselves to

Knowledge-based trust results from the accumulation of information about the other party, as a result of the relationship over time

relational trust, is based on a shared history and perceptions that interests (and often beliefs, values and attitudes) are aligned or complementary between the two parties. At this point, the level of trust becomes a taken for granted assumption based on a more complete synthesis of experience with the other party.