Process of Identifying Murder Flashcards
Step 1 - identify facts which could give rise to liability
eg X stabbed Y
step 2 - identify relevant offence
murder
step 3 - define offence
unlawful homicide with malice aforethough
step 4 - what is the AR?
- unlawful
- killing
- reasonable person in being
- under Queen’s peace
- FROM COKE
step 5 - how can a death be lawful? Is this death lawful?
- self defense
- lawful execution
- time of war
step 6 - has D caused the killing? Factual test.
factual test - But For test: R v White
legal test - operating and substantial cause of death? Pagett. More than trifling cause? Kimsey
step 7 - has D caused the killing? Legal test.
legal test
- operating and substantial cause of death? Pagett.
- More than trifling cause? No NIA? Kimsey
step 8 - was victim a reasonable person in being?
- live human being?
step 9 - was the killing under the Queen’s peace?
- not in time of war or civil unrest
step 10 - what is the MR for murder?
- intention: ordinary meaning, Moloney
- to kill
- or cause GBH: serious harm R v Vickers
step 11 - if he satisfied these, did he have a special defense?
- loss of comtrol
- diminished responsibility
step 12 - definition and authority of loss of control
- s54(1) Coroners & Justice Act 2009
- loss of self control
- qualifying trigger
- reasonable man of same age and gender and acting under same circumstances might have done the same
step 13 - what does loss of control mean? Does D satisfy this?
- ordinary meaning, more than losing temper.
- R v Richens
step 14 - what is a qualifying trigger? What authority?
- s55(3) CJA 2009 fear of serious violence from victim
- s55(4) thing said or done or both which constitute circumstances of an extremely grave character and cause D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged - objective test
step 15 - what is required for diminished responsibility? What authority?
- s2 Homicide Act 1957
- abnormality of mental functioning
- arising from a recognised medical condition
- substantially impairs D’s ability to do the things mentioned in ss(1A)
- proved by defence on balance of probabilities (Dunbar)