Procedure set 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

o How many days before the pre-trial hearing must you file a motion for discovery? What consequences are there if you fail to file the discovery motion by that time? [F15]

A

 A motion for discovery must be filed 7 days before the pretrial hearing
 Failure to meet this deadline will prevent filing the motion later, except by permission of the court for good cause shown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

o Following a timely request from D to review evidence, does the TX Code of Criminal Procedure require the Prosecutor to take any action in response to the request? [F15]

A

 Yes, under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure the prosecutor must turn over material evidence in the possession of the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

o What does the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure require for police reports? [F16]

A

 The TX Code of Criminal Procedure requires the state to allow inspection and copying of police reports (expressly provides the right to inspect and make a photocopy of the offense report written by an officer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

o What procedural step can you try to take to obtain the testimony of a witness prior to trial and what must you show? [J15]

A

 Must apply to the court for authority to depose a witness
 Application must be accompanied by an affidavit setting out “good cause” for the deposition and notice of the depo must be given to the opposing party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

o What procedural step can you take to ensure that a witness is present at trial to testify? What are two things that you must state as part of that procedural step? [J15

A

]
 Compel appearance of a witness by use of subpoena process
 Must make application for subpoena to the clerk for each witness the side wishes to have subpoenaed; application should state the name of each witness, location and venue (fi known), and statement that testimony of witness is material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

o If you want to present the defense of insanity but D cannot afford one, must you forego hiring a psychiatrist?

A

 No, Counsel should file an Ake motion
 Due process entitles an indigent D to appointment of an expert
 To get the expert, counsel must show that the area of the expert’s expertise is likely to be a significant issue in the case
 The motion can be made ex parte (just to the judge) so the defense’s strategy is not revealed to the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

o When can a D withdraw a guilty plea? [J15]

A

 Before court – may withdraw plea as a matter of right any time before the court takes the plea under advisement or pronounces judgment on the plea
 Before jury – may withdraw plea as a matter of right any time before the jury retires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

o In what ways is a plea of nolo contendere the same as or different from plea of guilty? [F16]

A

 (1) it has the same legal effect as a plea of guilty,

 (2) it cannot be used in a civil case to attach as liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

o Is the sentence (or probation) provided for in a plea agreement guaranteed? [F15]

A

 No, a judge is not obligated to impose the sentencing agreement reached by the parties
 But, if the judge imposes a different sentence, D has the right to withdraw his plea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

o In what county or counties is venue proper for the prosecution of a crime? [J15]

A

 Venue lies in the county where the crime was committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which of the following court haves jurisdiction over the arrestee’s offense – district court, county court, or municipal court? [J15]

A

o

 Only district courts have jurisdiction over felony offenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

o Can a D charged with a felony waive the right to have the jury determine her guilt or innocent? If a D can waive that right, what procedural step, if any, must be taken by the D to do so? [F15]

A

 Yes, a D can waive her right to be tried by a jury in all cases except prosecutions for capital murder and where the State seeks the death penalty
 Waiver of jury trial requires the consent of the prosecutor and the judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

o What procedural steps can you take, if any, to try to obtain separate trials on each of the different (i.e. 3) counts in the indictment? [F15]

A

 You can move to sever all three counts
 When a D is scheduled for trial on multiple charges arising from one criminal episode, she has an absolute right to have the charges severed for separate trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

o What is a challenge for cause? How many challenges for cause are you allowed to make on D’s behalf? [F15; J15]

A

 A challenge to a member of the jury panel on the basis of one of the grounds specified in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
• Statutory grounds –Juror can be challenged because:
o A witness in the case;
o Served on grand jury in the case;
o Biased or prejudiced in favor of or against the defendant;
o Has reached a conclusion in the case which will influence his verdict;
o Cannot read or write; or
o Has a bias/prejudice against the law upon which one side or the other has a right to rely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a preemptory challenge? How many preemptory challenges are you allowed to make on D’s behalf? [F16, F15, J15]

A

 A mechanism for attorneys to strike prospective jurors without having to specify a rationale
 D charged with non-capital felony – allowed 10 preemptory challenges
• If two or more Ds are tried together:
o Each D gets 6 challenges; and
o Prosecution is entitled to 6 challenges per D
 D charged with misdemeanor – allowed 3 preemptory challenges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

o Prosecutor choses not to make an opening statement and defense requests to make an opening statement before the Prosecution calls his first witness to testify – court denies the request. Does the court’s ruling violate the law? [J15]

A

 Yes, the State’s decision not to make an opening statement before it calls its first witness gives the D the right right to make an opening statement at that time

17
Q

o What procedural step should you take to allow the jury to recommend probation (the option of imposing probation if the jury finds D guilty), and when should you take this step? [F16; F15]

A

 You should file an application for probation before trial (pre-trial motion)
 The application should be in writing, be sworn, and must verify that D has not previously been convicted of a felony (thus eligible for probation)

18
Q

o What are the two ways in which deferred adjudication differs from probation? [J15]

A

 Deferred adjudication:
• No conviction/no finding of guilt or innocence (if successfully completed)
• Can only be imposed prior to trial

19
Q

o How should the court rule following an objection to evidence of D’s prior bad acts? [F15]

A

 The court should probably overrule the objection
 Ordinarily, evidence of prior crimes, wrongs or bad acts is not admissible to show that a D has a propensity to commit the same conduct
 However, prior conduct may be admissible if offered for a different purpose (MIMIC)
 Under Texas law, the fact that prior misconduct does not end in a criminal conviction does not prevent it from being admitted
 The Texas Rule of Evidence recognize that intent can be shown by crimes, wrongs, or bad acts, regardless of whether they resulted in a criminal conviction

20
Q

o If you object to the competency of a witness, how should the court rule on your objection? [F15]

A

 In considering whether to sustain or overruling your objection  the judge should examine the witness on the record to determine whether he has sufficient intellect to relate transactions regarding which he will be asked to testify
• Example: Just because a witness is 5 years old does not mean that, per se, he cannot be a competent witness

21
Q

o When can a witness be impeached by introducing evidence of their prior criminal convictions/bad acts? [J15, F15]

A

 A witness can be impeached with a prior conviction that was a felony or misdemeanor that involved moral turpitude (i.e. theft)
 A conviction that is less than 10 years old is not stale and can be the basis of impeachment
 The effect that the witness’s satisfactory completion of probation had on the use of the conviction for impeachment

22
Q

o For the statement of account/business record to be admissible under the Texas Rules of Evidence, what must the testimony of the custodian of records show? [F15]

A

 The custodian must testify that:
• The records were kept in the regular course of business,
• It was the regular course of business for a person with knowledge of the matter to make the records,
• The entries were made at or near the time of events, and
• The witness is the custodian of the records

23
Q

o Defense objects to the admission of a videotape on the grounds that it has not been properly authenticated. How should the Court rule on the objections? [F16]

A

 Depends on whether the videotape has been properly authenticated
 If the video referenced in the question was properly authenticated under the rules of evidence, the objection should be overruled and the video should be admitted.
 Personal knowledge is not required.

24
Q

• How should the Court of Appeals rule on the Prosecution’s Appeal? [F15]

A

o The court should dismiss the prosecutor’s appeal

o The constitutional protection against double jeopardy prohibits the State from appealing a jury verdict of acquittal

25
Q

• Requirements for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: [F16]

A

o To show ineffective assistance D must show:
 (1) Lawyer’s actions were unreasonable (beyond the bounds of professional competence; and
 (2) D was prejudiced by the deficient performance of counsel (but-for counsel’s deficient performance, results of the proceeding would have been different)
o If D was not harmed (because, for example she was acquitted) she cannot make out a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel (cannot show prejudice)