Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

IHTM Paper 1 > Problem sets 1-7 > Flashcards

Problem sets 1-7 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the advantages of case control studies?

A
  • great in outbreaks, emergencies and resource limited settings
  • great for rare diseases
  • great for rare exposures and extreme relative risks
  • good for rare outcomes
  • can explore multiple exposures at once
  • can be faster and cheaper than other study designs
  • less potential for loss to follow up than cohort studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the disadvantages of case control studies?

A
  • can be difficult to establish temporal relationship
  • prone to systematic error, especially recall bias (and other forms of information bias - observer, interviewer, performance)
  • prone to issues with selection bias with controls
  • can be prone to confounding and reverse causality also
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can you mitigate concerns with confounding in the context of case control studies?

A

In the design stage, use matching

In the analysis stage, logistic regression (which gives you an adjusted OR score)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you correctly word the interpretation of an OR?

A

The odds of OUTCOME were OR times (higher or lower) in the CASES than the CONTROLS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the full formula for an OR?

A 
odds in exposed/odds in unexposed
= a/b
=c/d
= ad/bc
=OR!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outside of a CCS, what can using an OR do (especially for rare diseases)

A

exaggerate the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In the context of CCS, what core feature is especially important, and why?

A

Hypothesis generation, because it defines who will be selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When cases and controls are very similar, it is good because….

A

It reduces the risk of confounding (but must be careful for over matching)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is confounding?

A
  • The distortion of the association between an outcome and an exposure, which occurs when study groups differ with respect to other factors that influence the outcome
  • A confounding variable cannot be on the causal pathway be on the pathway between exposure and outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an ecological study?

A
  • a study when the observations are made on a group level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a particular concern in the context of the interpretation of ecological studies?

A
  • the ecological fallacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In the context of a survival analysis, what do you need to do to get statistically significant information?

A
  • do the log-rank test to make any inferences and to get a p-value
  • do a Cox’s regression to get your hazard ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does randomization control for?

A

Both known and unknown variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the context of an ecological study, what further analysis would help you draw further conclusions?

A

The correlation coefficient

Regression would help you identify any associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is it important to present an adjusted OR score?

A
  • Adjusted OR scores adjust for confounding of known variables
  • These variables depend on the given study, but typically include sex, age, weight, socio-economic status, racial origin
  • Adjusted OR scores are vital to present as they present the odds AFTER adjusting for known confounders
  • They increase the validity of results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the definition of recall bias?

A

Recall bias is a systematic error caused by differences in the accuracy or completeness of the recollections retrieved (“recalled”) by study participants regarding events or experiences from the past.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is a prevention strategy for recall bias?

A

The collection of information from objective sources, such as medical records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is heterogeneity?

A

Difference in results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why is it important to do a meta analysis?

A

It is important to do a meta analysis as conclusions cannot be drawn from a single intervention or study, as results tend to differ slightly from study to study

Doing a meta analysis applies objective formulas, which can identify the reasons for variation from study to study

  • ALWAYS CONTEXTUALISE your answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can meta analysis overcome all forms of systematic error?

A

No, it cannot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define randomization

A

The process by which a participant, who meets the neccessarily selection criteria, has an equal chance of being assigned to either the intervention or control arm of a study. This controls for known and unknown confounders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define what an RCT is, and how it is different from other study designs

A

An RCT is a quanitative, controlled, comparative experiement in which the effect of two or more interventions are studied in a group of participants who are RANDOMLY allocated to either intervention group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the two approaches to dealing with participants who are lost to follow up?

A

per protocol OR intention to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the definition of a chi-squared test?

A

The test of association between expected and observed data gathered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the advantages of cross-sectional studies?

A
  • guide public health descision-making
  • informs the health needs of a population
  • initial investigation of ideas
  • hypothesis generation
  • relatively quick
  • less expensive than alternatives
  • explore multiple exposures at once
  • helpful in the decision-making of allocation of resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the disadvantages of cross-sectional studies?

A
  • not the strongest design to provide strong evidence about the CAUSES of health-related OUTCOMES
  • Associations identifies may be hard to interpret
  • not suitable for rare exposures
  • not suitable for rare diseases
  • not suitable for highly fatal diseases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is a reference standard?

A

the best test that we currently have available - the “gold standard”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is an index test?

A

The test that we are testing to see if it could replace the reference standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Define sensitivity

A

The ability of a test to correctly identify the presence of a disease (the proportion of true positives that test postive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Define sensitivity

A

The ability of a test to correctly identify the presence of a disease (the proportion of true positives that test positive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Define specificity

A

The ability of a test to correctly identify the absence of a disease (the proportion of true negatives that test negative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Define NPV

A

The percentage of people who are not diagnosed with the condition who actually DON’T have the condition (or will not develop it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Define PPV

A

The percentage of people who are diagnosed with the condition who actually DO have the condition (or will develop it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Discuss and define the trade-offs associated with changing the cut-off score in the context of diagnostics

A

You will have to make tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity; it is just crucial to cover which you are specifying and WHY. Look at the meta analysis table for where the most specific test is for the cut off point.

If you increase the specificity of a test, you decrease the sensitivity

As a general rule - for a diagnostic/confirmatory test you want higher specificity, and for screening tests you want higher sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Define what a cohort study is

A

to examine possible relationships between an exposure and an outcome; prospective in nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Define what a case control study is

A

to examine possible relationships between an outcome and an exposure (retrospective in nature)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Define what a cross sectional study is

A

Health information on a population on a particular period in time; generally used for measuring the prevalence of health outcomes or determinants of health in a population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How are cohort studies and case control studies different?

A

Cohort studies define participants by exposure, case control studies define them by outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are the advantages of a cross sectional study

A
  • guide public health decision making
  • initial exploration of ideas
  • cheaper and faster than other study design times
  • helpful to decision making in terms of the allocation of resources
  • hypothesis generation
  • informing health needs of a population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What are the disadvantages of a cross sectional study

A
  • not the best study design for assigning attribution to health relates outcomes
  • because E and O are measured at the same time, any associations identified can be hard to interpret
  • other prospective study designs that gather data in incident cases are better
  • prone to confounding
  • not suitable for rare diseases, highly fata diseases, and diseases with a short duration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

How do you correctly word the interpretation of an RR which is LESS than 1?

A

The risk of OUTCOME was % LOWER in the PRIMARY INTERST GROUP than the UNEXPOSED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

How do you correctly word the interpretation of an RR which is MORE than 1?

A

The RISK of OUTCOME was RR times higher in EXPOSED than UNEXPOSED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is the importance of having a representative sample?

A

It helps ensure that your results are generalizable to a population and increases the scientific validity of your results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

In the context of an RR and OR, what is the null value?

A

1

45
Q

What kind of regression is used for categorical data?

A

Logistic

46
Q

What kind of regression is used for continuous data?

A

Linear

47
Q

What are the core assumptions of a survival analysis?

A

1) Survival Probabilities are the same for all the samples who joined late in the study and those who have joined early. The Survival analysis which can affect is not assumed to change.
2) Occurrence of Event are done at a specified time.
3) Censoring of the study does not depend on the outcome. The Kaplan Meier method doesn’t depend on the outcome of interest. The censoring is INDEPENDENT of outcome
4) Censoring is similar in all groups

48
Q

If an OR or RR does not contain 1, then the result is….

A

Statistically significant!

49
Q

What are the problems with evidence obtained from individual observational studies?

A

They do not address unknown confounders

They are liable to several forms of bias, including methods of randomization, criteria for eligibility, issues with blinding, analysis, and handling of protocol deviations all are important considerations surrounding study quality.

They cannot prove causation

50
Q

What is the formula to calculate sensitivity?

A

a/a+c

51
Q

What is the formula to calculate specificity?

A

b/b+d

52
Q

What is the formula to calculate PPV?

A

a/a+b

53
Q

What is the formula to calculate NPV?

A

d/c+d

54
Q

Why can you not ascribe equal weights to each study in a meta analysis?

A

Because each study was conducted in a particular population, where overall underlaying rates were different from each other, and with different indifidual effects. Some studies are likely to give an answer closer to the “true” effect size

55
Q

Why can you not ascribe equal weights to each study in a meta analysis?

A

Because each study was conducted in a particular population, where overall underlaying rates were different from each other, and with different individual effects. Some studies are likely to give an answer closer to the “true” effect size

56
Q

In meta-analysis, what does weighting depend on?

A

Number of participants
Number of events
Variance

57
Q

What are the 3 types of heterogeneity?

A
  • clinical
  • methodological
  • statistical
58
Q

In the context of a meta analysis, what does the chi-squared test do to the null hypothesis?

A

Tests the Ho that all tests are homogenous

59
Q

The higher the I-squared score, the higher…

A

…the heterogeneity

60
Q

What I-squared score is considered important?

A

0 - 40%, no important heterogeneity

75-100% considerable heterogeneity

61
Q

What are the advantages of a cohort study?

A
  • follows the natural course of disease
  • great for rare exposures
  • allows for the estimation of absolute risks, such as incident risks (as opposed to CCS, where you can only do relative risks)
  • multiple outcomes from one exposure can be studied
  • cause preceeds the effects, an important aspect for ASCRIBIDING CAUSALITY
62
Q

What are the disadvantages of a cohort study?

A
  • risk of loss to follow up: calls into question the scientific validity of results
  • resource and time-intensive
  • not appropriate for rare outcomes
  • not suitable for diseases with a long latency period
  • possible “study affects” eg performance bias with those being studied
63
Q

What is healthy entrant bias?

A

People who have the disease of interest, or symptoms indicative of the start of the disease, are often excluded from cohorts at recruitment
 Participants are biased towards healthy individuals
 Initial incidence of outcome therefore might be lower in the cohort than the general population
 The disease experiences of the cohort and that of the general population may well not be comparable

64
Q

What is non-response bias?

A

Non-response bias can occur if those who participated in the study were different from those who did not. Important to note that this is about PARTICIPATION and not SELECTION.

65
Q

What kinds of systematic error are RCTs liable to? Address and explain

A

Loss to follow up if there is not proper tracing involved. Information bias if: 1) participants not blinded (performance bias) 2) assessors not blinded (observer bias and/or interviewers not blinded). And finally, selection bias (allocation bias) if participants are not properly randomized

66
Q

What is the prevention strategy for observer bias?

A

The masking of participants from the identity of exposures

67
Q

What is observer bias?

A

when the investigator is aware of the disease status, treatment group or outcome of the subject and their ability to interview the subject, collect or analyse the data in an unbiased manner is compromised

68
Q

What is reporting bias?

A

When participants “collaborate” with researchers and give answers in the direction they perceive are of interest

69
Q

What is interviewer bias?

A

When an interviewer takes more detailed notes/more attention towards cases than controls in a way that means unequal levels of data have been collected for both groups that calls into question the validity of findings

70
Q

What is a prevention strategy for sampling bias?

A

Avoid using volunteers and use rigorous inclusion criteria

71
Q

What is a prevention strategy for recall bias?

A

Collection of data from medical records (or another objective source of information)

72
Q

What are some advantages of categorising an the exposure variable (originally continuous) into a binary variable?

A
  • Simplifies the statistical analysis and leads to easy interpretation and presentation of results
  • As long as the cut off is CLINICALLY REASONABLE
73
Q

What are some disadvantages of categorising an the exposure variable (originally continuous) into a binary variable?

A
  • Some participants in the low risk group could miss out on the potential intervention
  • Information could be lost so STATISTICAL POWER to detect a relation between the exposure and outcome variables is reduced
  • Dichotomising a variable at the median reduces power by the same amount as would discarding a third of the data
74
Q

What are the three features of a confounding variable?

A

A confounding variable is a variable which:

  • Does not lay on the causal pathway between E and O
  • It is a cause of exposure
  • A cause of the outcome of interest
75
Q

What is the definition of confounding?

A

A distortion of the association between exposure and outcomes. This occurs when the primary exposure of interest is mixed up with another factor that is associated with the outcome.

76
Q

What kinds of studies are cohort, case control, ecological and cross-sectional?

A

OBSERVATIONAL

77
Q

What kinds of studies are cohort, case control, and cross-sectional?

A

Observational analytical (bc there is a comparator)

78
Q

With case control studies, it can be difficult to…

A

Establish a temporal relationship (sequence of events)

This is because the exposure may be the result of, not cause, of the outcome of interest

79
Q

Case control studies are useful for…

A

Establishing an association between outcome and exposure

80
Q

A core strength of cohort studies is…

A

…that exposure precedes the outcome, an important aspect for ascribing causality

81
Q

In cross-sectional studies, associations identified…

A

….may be hard to interpret

82
Q

RCTs have the only study design which can…

A

in principle, directly address causal relationships

83
Q

What kinds of outcomes are cohort studies not suitable for???

A

Rare outcomes

84
Q

What kind of bias are case control studies prone to because of the design

A

Information bias as the participants are already aware of their health status/conditions

85
Q

What is the definition of selection bias?

A

when there is a systematic difference between the characteristics of those selected for the study and those who are not.

86
Q

In the context of case control studies, randomization decreases….

A

….sampling bias

87
Q

What are the advantages of an ecological study design

A
  • Ecological studies are very useful for generating hypothesizes
  • They are low-cost and convenient
  • They are helpful for indicating where further research is needed
  • The analysis and presentation of finings is simple
88
Q

What further analysis could you use for ecological studies?

A
  • correlation coefficient

- regression coefficient

89
Q

What would be the null hypothesis in the context of using the chi-squared test?

A

Ho = there is no association between the classification of the two attributes under investigation

90
Q

What is the chi-squared test based on?

A

The difference between the observed and expected frequencies

91
Q

What does the chi-squared test presume of it’s observations?

A

That they are independent

92
Q

What if you are comparing more than one means? Which test would you use

A

ANOVA (analysis of variance)

93
Q

What does correlation do?

A

Measures the strength of linear association between two continuous variables (exposure and outcome), giving us a score between -1 and 1

94
Q

What is the full name of the cox’s regression?

A

Proportional hazards regression

95
Q

What are the assumptions of cox’s regression?

A

hazards are proportions, all censoring is independent of outcomes , they have a constant underlaying rate

96
Q

What does the K-M curve do?

A

It is used to estimate the survival function. Yu would then do the long-rank test to compare the survival amongst 2 groups.

97
Q

What is regression?

A

…..a statistical method that can be used to determine the relationship between one or more predictor variables and a response variable.

98
Q

The response variable is…

A

….the dependent variable (normally Y!), the variable of interest

99
Q

What are the assumptions of logistic regression?

A
  1. Response variable (dependent variable) is binary (categorical)
  2. Observations are independent
  3. There are no extreme outliers
  4. There is a Linear Relationship Between Explanatory Variables and the Logit of the Response Variable
  5. Sample size is sufficiently large
100
Q

What is the outcome of survival analysis

A

Time to an event

101
Q

What is cox’s regression?

A

Cox regression analysis is a technique for assessing the association between variables and survival rate

102
Q

What does Cox regression do that K-M cannot do?

A

Create a multivariate analysis

103
Q

What would you do for further analysis on a K-M curve?

A
  • log rank test to get a p value

- cox’s proportional hazard’s regression to get a hazard ratio

104
Q

How do you word the reasoning for doing a meta analysis?

A

This meta analysis was performed to produce a summary estimate of the risk (or odds, depending on study type) of OUTCOME amongst EXPOSED

105
Q

In addition to applying objective formulas, what are two other IMPORTANT reasons for doing a meta analysis?

A

To hightlight the direction of the association between EXPOSURE and OUTCOME

Individual studies may be under powered

106
Q

In addition to applying objective formulas, what are two other IMPORTANT reasons for doing a meta analysis?

A

To highlight the direction of the association between EXPOSURE and OUTCOME

Individual studies may be under powered

107
Q

Greater sensitivity means….

A

….lower specificity. MORE FALSE POSITIVES

108
Q

Greater specificity means…

A

….lower sensitivity, MORE FALSE NEGATIVES

IHTM Paper 1 (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions