Problem 7: Moral Judgment Flashcards
Emotion
leads us to make fast relatively “automatic” decisions
Cognition
(reason)
produces slower, more considered decisions
Dual-process model of decisions made with moral dilemmas (Greene)
- a fast, automatic, and affective system
–> intuitive
–> emotion generation/ emotional processing
–> ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) - a slower, effortful, and more “cognitive” system
–> deliberate
–> cognitive control/controlled processing
–> dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)
–> assumption that utilitarian responding to moral dilemmas requires deliberate correction of an intuitive deontological response
deontological judgments
judgments based on moral rules and/or obligations when resolving moral dilemmas
–> the morality of an action depends on the intrinsic nature of the action
–> harming someone is considered wrong regardless of its potential benefits
–> use System 1
utilitarian judgments
judgments based on practical and pragmatic considerations when resolving moral dilemmas
–> the morality of an action is determined by its consequences
–> one performs a cost-benefit analysis and chooses the greater good
–> use System 2
Counter evidence of the Dual-Process Model
–> the utilitarian response is given in the initial phase of a moral judgment
–> utilitarian responders do not necessarily need to deliberate to correct an initial deontological response
–> utilitarian intuitions are not a curiosity that results from extreme or trivial scenario content but lies at the very core of the moral reasoning process
personal moral dilemma
we might directly harm one or more individuals through our actions
–> footbridge dilemma
impersonal moral dilemma
any harm is only indirectly due to our actions
–> trolley dilemma
CNI model (Grawonski)
C = Consequences
N = Moral Norms
I = Preference for Inaction
in moral dilemmas, utilitarian judgments could actually be a lack of aversion to harming others and deontological judgments could be a general preference for inaction regardless of moral norms
moral judgment stories
stories designed to trigger moral intuitions of condemnation, actions in them are disgusting or disrespectful, but completely harmless
WEIRD society morality
a morality that protects those individuals and their individual rights
–> emphasizes concerns about harm and fairness
non-WEIRD society morality
sociocentric morality –> you place the needs of groups and institutions first, often ahead of the needs of individuals
The ethic of autonomy
based on the idea that people are, first and foremost, autonomous individuals with wants, needs, and preferences
–> concepts in a society: rights, liberty, and justice
–> dominant in individualistic societies
The ethic of community
based on the idea that people are, first and foremost, members of larger entities such as families, teams, armies, companies, tribes, and nations
–> concepts in a society: duty, hierarchy, respect, reputation, and patriotism
The ethic of divinity
based on the idea that people are, first and foremost, temporary vessels within which a divine soul has been implanted
–> concepts in a society: sanctity and sin purity and pollution, elevation and degradation