Problem 3 Flashcards
Introspection
Refers to looking into ones own mind + observing its contents
–> observing your conscious experience
AND: best method
Name the things that Introspection is NOT.
Introspection is not
- equivalent to having conscious experiences
- -> attempts to describe it but most of it is fleeting + immediately forgotten - a sensory process (Homunculus fallacy)
- -> no sensory modalities, but just verbal thinking - a brain scanner
- -> conscious experience + neurophysiological observations are 2 different perspectives (objective vs subjective) - the making of inferences about our mental states based on our overt behavior
- direct inner observation
- -> this is impossible, just like you cant see your own eye
Name the things that consciousness IS.
- Active self-observation
- -> reflective consciousness - Passive inner-observation
- -> primary consciousness
Name the types of Introspection.
- Analytic
- Descriptive/ Phenomenal
- Interpretive
Analytic Introspection
Describes experiences in term of elementary constituents
ex.: table= rectangle with edges, can result in stimulus error
Descriptive introspection
Describing ones experience in terms of natural language
e.g.: asking oneself what one feels, thinks, perceive
Interpretive Introspection
Asking oneself why on feels these things
e.g.: trying to identify antecedents of thoughts, feelings, actions
Introspective verbal report
IVR
Refers to the verbal description of the conscious experience
–> no attempt to interpret or analyze + used in all research on consciousness
Name the limitations to the IVR.
- Forgetting
- Reconstruction errors
- Verbal Deskription difficulties
- Distortion through observation
- Censorship
- Experimental demands
- Lack of Independent verification
- Subsitiutiaon of inferences for observations
How is forgetting a limitation to the IVR ?
- One can only report conscious contents when info is still available in STM
- Verbal reports will be inaccurate when
a) info wasn’t transferred to LTM
b) info cannot be retrieved form LTM
How are reconstruction errors a limitation the IVR ?
One may report more than actually recalls by filling in the blanks with plausible fabrications
–> report may be more orderly than was was recalled
How are verbal description difficulties a limitation to IVR ?
Being unable to describe in own words
–> some words might have different meanings to different people
How is distortion through observation a limitation to IVR ?
- Heisenberg uncertainty principle
- Introspective uncertainty principle
THUS: when trying to introspect while resolving a difficult problem one may try to store more details than usual, causing the thought process to go slower
Heisenberg uncertainty principle
Occurs when the process of observation alters the object of observation
Introspective uncertainty principle
Occurs when attempting to introspect, which in turn may change the contents that are being observed
How is censorship a limitation to the IVR ?
Subjects may be reluctant to reveal embarrassing thoughts
–> may give false reports or claim they do not recall anything
How are a lack of independent verification a limitation to the IVR ?
One is unable to check the accuracy of the report
–> major reason why it is rejected as a scientific method
How is the substitution of inferences for observations a limitation to the IVR ?
When people do not have direct introspective access to the stimuli or mental processes that caused their feelings or behavior, they may make plausible inferences, using whatever information is available
e.g.: eating rapidly –> saying because hungry but actually just a habit
How could one overcome the limitations of the IVR ?
- Collecting data within few seconds of the experience
- Training to use special vocabulary
- Minimising distortion by asking for retrospective reports
- Asking for the general nature of experiences not detail, so no censorship
Name the methods for obtaining IVRs.
- Thinking out loud
- -> continuous verbal report while solving the task - Thought sampling
- -> report, when a signal is given - Retrospective reports
- Event recording
- Diaries
- Group questionnaires
Advantages vs disadvantages of thinking out loud.
- A lot of detailed info about a stream of consciousness, w/o forgetting
- Introspection + report may alter thought process
Advantages vs disadvantages of thought sampling.
- Less distortion about the normal progression of thoughts, no forgetting
- Not as much detail
Advantages vs disadvantages of retrospective reports
- Does not interfere with ongoing thought process
- a) forgetting
b) reconstruction errors
c) substituting inferences from observation
Advantages vs disadvantages of event recording
- Trace changes in the frequency + little forgetting
- Sometimes forget to report pertinent thought
- -> decrease after adaptation period