Problem 2: Behaviourism Flashcards
what are the 3 types of conditioning
classical
emotional
operant
what is classical conditioning?
process when a stimulus which is initially nautral brings out a strong response – specific involuntary behaviour
classical conditioning requires 2 conditions
- organism must already respond to some class of stimuli reflexively – the response must occur reliably and automatically whenever the stimulus occurs.
–> reflex: existing connection between a stimulus and a response, such that the first causes the second
ex: touch oven→ pull hand away
some reactions are innate others learned in the past, but in each case a stimulus leads reliably to a particular response - stimulus in the reflex must be associated in time and place with another stimulus
–> second stimulus is usually (not always) neutral at first
neutral stimulus: causes no particular response beyond being noticed, and it can be pretty much anything (color, sound, object, person…)
what was the Pavlov’s dogs study like?
Procedure:
dogs drool with food (1), so Pavlov decided to ring a bell when the food was present (3)
Results:
after a while the dogs would drool when hearing the bell even without the food (4)
the food and the bell are stimuli (singular form ⇒ stimulus)
behaviour of the dog is the response
identify the US, the CS, the UR and the CR in the pavlov experiment
- food ⇒ original stimulus = unconditioned stimulus (even without conditioning it leads to a response)
- bell ⇒ new stimulus (neutral) ⇒ conditioned stimulus
- drooling when seeing food ⇒ unconditioned response
- drooling when hearing the bell ⇒ conditioned response
so, how does classical conditioning occur? (2 stages)
STAGE 1. situation before conditioning
- only the reflex exists, a stimulus causing a response
stimulus is called the unconditioned stimulus (US)
the response it creates is called unconditioned response (UR)
–> unconditional: no special condition is required for the response to occur, it’s automatic when the stimulus occurs)
STAGE 2: conditioning
- neutral stimulus occurs along with, or slightly before, the US.
neutral stimulus is termed conditioned stimulus (CS)
when paired the response it creates is called conditioned response (CR)
(conditioned: a response occurs in its presence only under the condition that the US is there too - when the US comes the UR follows automatically)
CS and US are paired frequently → CS can produce CR (without US)
CR is often very similar to the UR, in some cases they look identical, but CR is less intense
if the UR has an (un)pleasant quality so will the CR
SUM UP:
- There is a pre-existing reflexive connection between a stimulus (US) and a response (UR).
- A neutral stimulus (CS) is then paired repeatedly in time and space with the US.
- The result is the development of a new response, termed a conditioned response (CR).
- Once conditioning has occurred, presenting the CS by itself will now lead to the CR.
if you know that US has occurred repeatedly with a neutral stimulus, how do you know whether conditioning has taken place?
present CS by itself (without US) → if there’s no reaction, there’s been no conditioning.
The more frequently the CS is paired with the US,…
the more likely conditioning will occur.
If a US is very strong, however (causing a very intense UR) …
→ conditioning may occur with only one pairing.
what is higher-order conditioning (3rd stage of classical conditioning)? give an example
once conditioning has taken place CS-CR act as any other reflex meaning that once it’s there it can act as a reflex for another instance of conditioning
back to ex: once Sicilian music has been conditioned to induce sexual arousal, Sicilian music can be used to condition that arousal to other things (photograph in the place where you listen to the songs).
what is generalization? give an example
is responding in a similar way to similar-but-not-identical stimuli.
ex: Suppose your experiences in the Sicilian restaurant have led you to associate candlelight, crimson wallpaper, and Italian food (as CSs) with sexual arousal (as CR). What would happen if you walked into a room with similar stimuli to the one that got linked to sexual arousal.? you’d probably start to feel the glow of arousal, although probably not as much as in the first room.Your reaction would fall off even more if the new room differed even more from the first room.
what is discrimination? give an example
means responding differently to different stimuli.
ex: If you walked into a room with fluorescent lights and blue walls, the mellow glow associated with the Sicilian restaurant would surely not emerge.You would discriminate between the two sets of stimuli. Discrimination and generalization are complementary – Generalization gives way to discrimination, as the stimuli become more different from the initial CS.
what is extinction? give an example
Extinction occurs when a CS appears repeatedly without the US. At first, the CS leads reliably to the CR. But gradually, over repeated presentations, the CR grows weaker.The CR doesn’t actually disappear, however. Even when a response stops in a session, there’s a “spontaneous recovery” the next day
ex: when the dog does not get food when ringing the bell for a long time - CR fades away
what is spontaneous recovery? give an example
once a stimulus is conditioned it never really leaves it can weaken only which leads to spontaneous recovery: reappearance after amount of time
what is emotional conditioning?
Classical conditioning in which the CR are emotional reactions
What was the aim of Watson’s “Little Albert” experiment? (hypothesis)
Can we condition fear of an animal by visually presenting it and simultaneously striking a steel bar ?
If such a conditioned emotional response can be established, will there be a transfer to other animals or other objects?
what is the effect of time upon such conditioned emotional responses?
If after a reasonable period such emotional responses have not died out, what laboratory methods can be devised for their removal?
How was Albert?
reared almost from birth in hospital environment (mom was a nurse in the Harriet Lane Home for Invalid children
healthy from birth and one of the best developed at the hospital
he was stolid and unemotional → his stability is one of reasons why he was used for the test
what happened in “phase 1: before conditioning” ?
Albert is 9 months old
to determine whether fear reactions can be called out by other stimuli than sharp noises and the sudden removal of support
the infant was confronted suddenly and for the first time with
- a white rat
- a rabbit
- a dog
- a monkey
- masks with and without hair
- cotton wool
- burning newspapers (fire)
these were objects that he initially liked and caused positive reactions (the white rat was the fav)
Albert never showed fear or rage and barely ever cried
what happened in “phase 2: conditioning” to test the first hypothesis:
“Can we condition fear of an animal by visually presenting it and simultaneously striking a steel bar?”
what did the experimenter conclude?
albert is 11 months 3 days old
Rat showed to albert
When he touched it they struck the bar immediately behind his head
He was scared but did not cry the first 2 times
1 week break
albert is 11 months 10 days old
3rd time: rat was presented without sound, he did not reach for it, when the rat touched his hand he immediately moved it way → 2 previous simulations had effect on him
tested with his blocks afterwards to see if they shared the process of conditioning: he picked them up and played with them — these blocks were used to test his general emotional state and always removed from sight when the experiment took place.
EVENTUALLY (after +-7 trials) the sight of the rat alone made him cry and began to crawl away rapidly (panic) – 1st time he cried
–> answer: yes, conditioning was observed