Probleem 3 - Language production and conversation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Self-repairs

A

Corrections for which we spontaneously interrupt our speech. Consists of three parts:

  1. Self-interruption after detecting an error.
  2. Utter editing expressions; uh, uhm, sorry.
  3. Repair utterance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Self-interruptions

A

Stopping after detecting an error in speech. Anticipations were more corrected than perseverations. The correction happened very shortly after the error&raquo_space; 51% direct after error.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Editing expressions

A

Conveys to the listener the kind of trouble that the speaker is correcting.

  • Uh = remembering
  • Oh = guessing
  • That is = specifying
  • Rather = nuance
  • I mean = real error

Uh is most used and in most languages, it is a symptom of trouble.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the different types of self-repairs?

A
  1. Instant repairs: Retracing back to error word, restating sentence again from that word on.

Ex. Again back to the same blank crossing point - white crossing point.

  1. Anticipatory retracings: The speaker retraces back to some point prior to the error.

Ex. And left to the purple crossing point - to the red crossing point.

  1. Fresh starts: Speaker drops the original structure and just starts over.

Ex. From yellow down to brown - no that’s red.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conversations

A

Form of social interaction with its own rules and tactics. These ‘rules’ depend on cultural background. Conversations differ from other forms of speech interactions in the number of people and the degree to which, topics and turns are specified in advance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Joint action

A

An action that us carried out by two or more people acting coordination with each other. An example of this is a conversation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Opening conversations

A

Number of possibilities of opening a conversation is infinite. In practice used is limited:
- Address another person: Hey Carl!
- Request information: Do you know what time it is?
- Offering information:
Are you looking for someone?
- Stereotyped expression/topic: Nice weather, right?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Closing conversations

A

Is often done by presenting a pre-closing statement:

  • Using we-ell, so-o-o-o
  • Summarizing content
  • Justifying ending: I have a meeting in 10 minutes.
  • Expressing pleasure of contact: Enjoyed talking to you.
  • Planning future contact: See you later.
  • Wishing each other well: Take care!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Taking turns

A

Turn taking operates by three implicit ordered rules:

  • The current speaker is allowed to select the next speaker.&raquo_space; Often done by asking a question.
  • Self-selection: If rule 1 is not applied another person may speak up.
  • Current speaker can continue, is not obligated to do so.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Signals to regulate turns

A

Nonverbal behavior also facilitates an orderly transition between speakers.

Turn-yielding signal: The display of one or more of six behavioral cues that appear to indicate willingness to conclude one’s turn:

  • A drop of pitch.
  • A drawl on the final syllable.
  • The termination of hand gestures.
  • The use of stereotypes expressions such as you know, but and uh.
  • A drop in loudness.
  • Completion of a grammatical clause.

Attempt-suppressing signal: The continued use of hand gestures together with some cues mentioned above is used when a listener wants to speak up but doesn’t know what to say, so doesn’t want the turn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Negotiating topics of conversation

A

There is a strong social convention to be ‘relevant’, so to stick to the topic.

Topics can be defined in terms of the intersection of propositions across sentences.

Variation is due to layers of conversation:

  • Layer 1 = Primary layer of conversational activity.
  • Layer 2 = Builts on top of layer 1 with different perspectives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Identifying participants and nonparticipants

INVOEGEN AFBEELDING

A

Participants = Speaker + Addressee + Side participants

Listeners = Speaker + Addressee + Side participants + Bystander + Eavesdropper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking

A

Article proposes that speakers use uh and um to announce that they are initiating what they expect to be a minor (uh), or major (um), delay in speaking.&raquo_space; Uh and um are conventional words and speakers plan for, formulate and produce them like any other word.

Hypotheses

  • If uh and um are interjections they should have basic meanings and should be useful for implicating.
  • All interjections require timing as part of their meaning, so uh and um too.
  • Uh and um have a collateral use.

Method
Used corpus data to extract words out of conversations. Looked at delays before and after uh/um.

Results

  • Delays after uh and um; More pauses after um than uh. Pauses were longer after um than uh.&raquo_space; Support for filler-as-word hypothesis.
  • Delays before uh and um; More pauses before um than before uh. Longer pauses before um than before uh. There were delays almost twice as often before prolonged um than before normal um.

Conclusion

  • Uh and um differed sharply in the delays that followed them, but little in the delays that preceded them.
  • Speakers don’t consider um a prolonged uh&raquo_space; selecting uh/um is separate from prolonged selected item.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Theory of performance

A

Speakers proceed two tracks of communication simultaneously:

  • Primary track: Topics of discourse.
  • Collateral track: Performance of language (timing, delays etc.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conceptions of uh and um

A

Uh and um have long been called filled pauses in contrast to silent pauses. Three views:

  1. Filler-as-symptom: Uh and um are automatic/involuntary consequences of one or another process in speaking.
  2. Filler-as-nonlinguistic-signal: Uh and um are signals.
  3. Filler-as-word: Uh and um are interjections&raquo_space; view of article.

uh&raquo_space; announce minor delay
um&raquo_space; announce major delay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prolongation hypothesis

A

Speakers prolong a syllable or its parts to signal that they are continuing a delay that is ongoing.

17
Q

Interjection

A

A conventional lexical form that conventionally constitutes an utterance and doesn’t enter into constructions with other word classes.

18
Q

Collateral signals

A

Signals that tell something about the production of language can be divided into 4 categories:

  • Inserts; I mean, you know, sorry.
  • Juxtapositions; Replacements.
  • Modifications
  • Concomitants; Signals produced at same time (nods, gazes, smiles).
19
Q

What are the steps for planning a utterance?

A
  1. Conceptualize a message.
  2. Formulate appropriate linguistic expression.
  3. Articulate them.
20
Q

Figuur 1 AFBEELDING

A

Variantie wordt verklaard door verschil tussen uh en um, en in mindere mate door verschil tussen normale en verlengde weergave. Dit is terug te zien in het figuur doordat de grootste verschillen zichtbaar zijn tussen uh kolommen en um kolommen. De normale vs verlengde variant draagt weinig bij aan variantie doordat je de normale vergelijkt met verlengde variant en dit verschil is niet zo groot dan verschil tussen uh en um kolommen. Ook is het verschil tussen uh en u:h ongeveer even groot als verschil tussen um en u:m. Dit toont aan dat er geen interactie-effect is. Als er wel een interactie-effect zou zijn dan zou het verschil tussen uh en u:h een stuk groter zijn.

21
Q

Figuur 3 AFBEELDING

A

Normaal vs verlengd is verantwoordelijk voor de grootste verschillen in figuur 3. Verschillen tussen normale en verlengde variant zijn groot. Verschil tussen uh en u:h is ongeveer net zo groot als verschil tussen um en u:m, dus er is geen sprake van interactie-effect.

22
Q

Zoom disrupts the rhythm of conversation (Boland, 2021)

A

Goal
Comparing local and remote (zoom) turn transition times using a yes/no paradigm and unscripted conversation.

Experiment 1

  • Examines zoom delay on time of taking turn.
  • Participants responded yes/no paradigms as quickly as possible to prerecorded questions.
  • Each response was defined via three variables: remote/control, predictable/unpredictable and order.

Hypotheses

  • Transition times are longer during remote interactions.
  • Predictable questions will be faster than unpredictable questions.
  • No influence for order.

Results

  • Local response latency = 297 ms.
  • Remote response latency = 976 ms.
  • As the difference is greater than estimated audio delay (30-70 ms) the delay is due to disruption in rhythm of neural oscillators.

Experiment 2

  • Examines if the results of experiment 1 generalizes to a natural conversation.
  • Hypothesis: Longer transition times in remote condition.

Results

  • There was a main effect of remote on transition times. There are longer transition times between speaker’s turns for zoom conversations than for face-to-face conversations.&raquo_space; Replicates exp. 1, but smaller effect size.
  • Remote conversations have less and longer turns than face-to-face conversations.
23
Q

Neural Oscillators

A

The rapid transitions between turns in conversations can be initiated by the automatic neural oscillator mechanism. It synchronizes between speakers in syllables.