Privy to a Contract^ Flashcards

1
Q

Tweedle V Atkinson

A

only those who are parties to the original contract can claim rights under that contract.
even if it was made for someone else’s benefit
- Would have been different under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jackson V Horizen Holidays

A

J able to claim benefits from the contract for the rest of his family even though they weren’t part of the original agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dunlop V Selfridge

A

shows how privity to a contract makes sense as it will be unfair for a company to be sued when they did not make the agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Agency

A

common law exceptions
An agent is authorised to make an agreement on behalf of another party
so they can claim rights for that agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Collateral Contract

A

common law exceptions
separate agreement made alongside the original agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Shanklin Pier V Detel Products

A

example of collateral contract
separate agreement alongside the original agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Restrictive Covenants

A

common law exceptions
Issues with land only
Restrictions placed on land, stay with it even if the occupier changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tulk V Moxhay

A

a term of the agreement for the sell of land that stays with the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

A

third parties can claim right if:
- they are expressly names or match a description in the agreement
- It is expressed that they should be able to claim rights under the agreement
- The agreement is made for their benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beswick V Beswick

A

outcome of would be different after the introduction of the act
- aunt not being considered as a part of the contract even though she was identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly