Privileges Flashcards
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
= permit one to refuse to disclose and prohibit other from disclosing certain sorts of confidential information in judicial proceedings
reason for privileges
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- practicality
2. society’s desire to encourage certain relationship by ensuring their confidentiality
2 types of privilege
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- instrumental
2. privacy
instrument privileges
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Justification = utilitarian reasons supporting socially valuable things
- Such as = people getting advice from lawyers or speaking openly to physicians or therapist
privacy privileges
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Justification = privacy concerns
- Such as = marital communications or national security secrets
rules
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- No privileges in FRE
- RULE 501 provides applicable privilege law
- 1101(c) provides application to proceeding
RULE 501
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- COMMON LAW, as interpreted as by US court in light of reason and experience, GOVERNS a claim of privilege UNLESS any of the following provides otherwise
a. US Constitution
b. Federal statute
c. Rules prescribed by SC
- But in a CIVIL CASE, STATE LAW governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision
RULE 1101(c) TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Privileges apply to “all stages of all actions, cases, and proceedings”
- Includes hearing conducted under FRE 104(a) to determine the preliminary admissibility of evidence
5 privileges recognized by federal law
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Attorney-client privilege
- Spousal immunity
- Confidential marital communications
- Psychotherapist/social worker-client privilege
- Clergy-penitent privilege
privilege not recognized by federal law
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
= Doctor-patient privilege
NOTE: often recognized by state law
persons who may assert privilege - 3 takeaways
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Privilege is personal = may be asserted only by
a. the party whose interest is sought to be protected OR
b. someone authorized to assert it on the holder’s behalf - If privilege is held by more than one person, each of them can claim the privilege
- Person with whom the confidence was shared may sometimes claim it on the holder’s behalf
who may assert privilege?
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
Privilege is personal = may be asserted only by
a. the party whose interest is sought to be protected OR
b. someone authorized to assert it on the holder’s behalf
if privilege is held by more than one persons, who can claim the privilege?
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
If privilege is held by more than one person, each of them can claim the privilege
confidentiality - 2 takeaways
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
- Communication must be shown to have been made in confidence to be privileges
- Many states recognize presumption that any disclosures made in course of relationship for which privilege exists were made in confidence
comment on/inference from use
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
No inference should be drawn from fact that witness has claimed a privilege
= Counsel for parties and judge are not permitted to make any comment or argument base on claim of privilege
4 waivers of privilege
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
All types of privileges are waived by
- Failure to claim the privilege by the holder herself
- Failure to object when privileged testimony is offered
- Voluntary disclosure of privileged matter by the holder or someone with holder’s consent (unless disclosure is also privileged)
- Contractual provision waiving in advance the right to claim a privilege
privilege not waived
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
Privilege is not waived where
- Someone wrongfully disclosed the information without the holder’s consent
- One joint holder waives the privilege
eavesdroppers
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
A privilege based on confidential communications is not abrogated because the communication is overheard by someone whose presence is unknown to the parties
= privilege still applies to the parties to the confidential communication
whether eavesdroppers may testify
TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES
Traditional view = the eavesdropper may testify to what he has overheard
Modern trend = as long as the holder of the privilege was not negligent, there is no waiver of the privilege, and eavesdropper is also prohibited from testifying
rationale
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
= to encourage candor between client and attorney
general rule
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
- Communications
- between an attorney and client (or representatives thereof)
- made during professional consultation
- are privileged from disclosure
NOTE = Objects and preexisting documents are not protected
relevant law
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
- First testimonial privilege ever established
- Common law privilege
- Codified by statute in some jurisdiction
holder of the privilege
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
= client or representative
NOTES
- person who was the attorney at the time of communication can claim the privilege, but only on behalf of the client
- attorney’s authority to do this is presumed in the absence of any evidence to the contrary
duration of the privilege
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
= indefinitely
- Termination of attorney-client relationship does not terminate privilege
- Client’s death does not terminate the privilege
attorney-client relationship
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
- Must exist at the time of communications
- Client must be seeking professional services of the attorney
- Disclosures made before attorney has decided to accept/decline the case = covered
confidential communication
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
CONFIDENTIAL if communication was not intended to be disclosed to third persons
- other than those
a. to whom disclosure would be in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client OR
b. who are necessary for the transmission of the communication
NOT CONFIDENTIAL if communication was made in the known presence and hearing of a stranger
= not privileged
2 major requirements
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
- attorney-client relationship
2. confidential communication
examination by doctor at attorney’s request
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
= covered by attorney-client privilege
b/c examination is necessary to help client communicate her condition to the attorney
= not covered by physician-patient privilege
b/c no treatment is contemplated
BUT privilege would be waived if doctor were later called as an expert witness by same client
attorney acts for both parties
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Lawsuit between the two parties = no privilege can be invoked
b/c they obvious did not desire and could not expect confidentiality as between themselves in a joint consultation
Lawsuit between either or both of the parties and 3P = privilege can be claimed
b/c multiple parties can desire and expect confidentiality as against the outside world