Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination Flashcards

1
Q

Who can assert the privilege against self-incrimination?

A

only natural persons, not corporations or partnerships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When can a person assert the privilege against self-incrimination?

A

when the person believes their response might tend to incriminate them; i.e. furnish a link in the chain of evidence showing their guilt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where a person does not claim the privilege against self-incrimination in a civil case, can they claim the privilege in a subsequent criminal case?

A

no, you must claim the privilege in a civil case if you wish to claim it in a subsequent criminal case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can a defendant be asked to take the witness stand?

A

no, but the defendant may choose to do so. No one can ask him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can a witness who wishes to claim the privilege against self-incrimination choose not to testify?

A

no, only the defendant has discretion on whether they can testify. All other witnesses must testify on the stand. If they wish to claim the privilege, they must specifically claim it in response to questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does being required to furnish one’s name after a Terry Stop violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination?

A

no, because furnishing one’s name is usually not enough to incriminate you.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only protects what kind of evidence?

A

testimonial evidence. It does not protect against the introduction of physical evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is a witness’s communication considered testimonial?

A

when it relates to a factual assertion or disclosure of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does the privilege against self-incrimination allow a person to refuse providing certain documents to the authorities?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does the privilege against self-incrimination prohibit the police from making a search of someone’s residence or possessions to find incriminating evidence?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does a violation of the privilege against self-incrimination actually occur?

A

when incriminating evidence is used against the witness in a criminal case. The mere receipt of such incriminating evidence is not itself a violation of the privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does the privilege against self-incrimination allow a suspect to refuse to be in an identification line-up?

A

no, because being in the line-up, or even being required to say certain phrases is not testimonial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is testimony that is freely given by the suspect to the police capable of being protected under the privilege against self-incrimination?

A

no, because the privilege only applies to *compelled testimony. If a defendant freely gives the police information, than the information is not privileged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When can’t a prosecutor comment on a defendant’s remaining silent?

A

after the suspect has been arrested and given their Miranda warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When can a prosecutor comment on a defendant’s remaining silent?

A

before the defendant is arrested or given their Miranda warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can a prosecutor comment on a defendant’s not testifying at trial?

A

no

17
Q

When can a prosecutor comment on a defendant’s choosing not to take the stand?

A

only when the defendant asserts that his side of the story has not been given a chance to be heard.

18
Q

When a prosecutor impermissibly comments on a defendant’s silence, what standard is applied in determining whether to call a mistrial?

A

the harmless error test.

19
Q

Can a state create a statute that punishes one’s choosing not to testify?

A

no

20
Q

What is use and derivative use immunity?

A

immunity given by the prosecution to the defendant which states the defendant will not be prosecuted using the evidence their testimony will provide.

21
Q

Can immunized testimony be used for impeachment purposes at a defendant’s trial?

A

no, because it was made under the protection of immunity.

22
Q

Can federal prosecutors use evidence that was derived from a *state grant of immunity against the uttering party?

A

no

23
Q

Can state prosecutors use evidence that was derived from a federal grant of immunity against the uttering party?

A

no

24
Q

Where a person has no possibility of being incriminated by their testimony, may they still assert the privilege against self-incrimination?

A

no

25
Q

Where a person is given immunity for their testimony, does that protection them from being prosecuted for any perjury they may make during their testimony?

A

no