Private v State Action / Enforcement Clause Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How to ascribe Private Actions to the Gov = State Actions:
(2)

Protecting that Right under the Constitution.

A

1) “Public Function”, OR

2) State involvement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some traditional Public Functions that were “exclusively” done by the state:

(5)

A

1) School- partially state funded.
2) Park- privately-operated. (Evans)
2) Political Party - State convention. (Allwright)
4)”Company Town”- not shopping centers.
(e.g. IBM in Binghamton)
5) Judicial role-
(lender foreclosing on collateral)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How to recognize State involvement:

4

A

1) Requiring / Commanding action.
(Shelly v Kraemer: CT Enforces racist contract.)

2) State benefits from the action.
(Burton v Wilmington: State rents parking lot to racist restaurant.)
BUT:
(Moose Lodge: Granting liquor license = NOT enough.)

3) Heavy participation.
(Brentwood Academy: Association regulates interscholastic sports in state, most members are public schools.)

4) Encouragement:
(Mulkey: State prohibited gov from interfering with individuals right to discrim.)
Acquiescence not enough: (Private utilities.)

5) Entanglement:
(Edmondson: State allows private litigant to exclude jurors on race-preemptory challenge.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Power & Limits of 13th:

A

1) Prevent & Remedy: “badges and incidents of slavery.”
2) Must have a Statute:

-Congress can ban private racist acts
(Jones v Alfred: Housing Discrimination.)

Where private action meets State:
Congress can make it a crime to interfere with public school desegregation.

  • BUT if specific racism has not been outlawed- then 13th cant reach it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How to Enforce the Civil War amendments against State action that racially discriminates:

A

Remedial Powers are Broad - BUT - Response cant be broader than the Discrim:

“Congruent and Proportional” to the Discrim.
(Boerne v Flores: To ban conduct = Must show evidence that state frequently violated const rights in that area.)

(SC v Katzenbach: Congress may use 15th to ban valid voting literacy tests if history shows the tests may lead to violations.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is Congress expanding or contracting the scope of a const right:

A

Under Boerne v Flores:
Congress may neither expand nor contract the boundaries of a const right, even under power to enforce the post-Civil War Amendments.

Only courts may interpret and uncover const rights?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did congress prohibit Private Racism in Public accommodations:

A

Congress used its interstate commerce power to create 1964 Civil Rights Act:

(Katzenbach: No mater how small the store or how little interstate revenue. Segregation imposes an artificial restriction on the flow of merchandise.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can Congress allow a person to sue State for damages for violation of Fed Anti-Discrim statute:

(2)

A

Only Civil War Amendments Enforcement power can overcome States immunity from private Fed suit under 11th:

Congress must shows:

1) Widespread past violations by the State; AND
2) Remedy chosen is “Congruent and proportional.”

(Kimel: Could protect age discrim but NOT w/out evidence of routine violations.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When can Congress overcome State 11th immunity from private suit for damages for violation of Const right:

A

Anytime there is an actual violation
(US v Georgia)
Does not need to be Congruent & Proportional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 11th Protections and Limits on a State:

A

1) Only State is protected: NOT cities.
2) NO: Fed Damages Suits by citizens OR non-citizens.
3) Congress can only overcome 11th using Civil War Amendments enforcement.

4) State MAY be Enjoined:
(Ex parte Young: can sue to enjoin a state official from acting in way that would violate P’s const right or Fed law.)

5) State may NOT violate const rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly