private nuisance Flashcards
definition
an interference with a persons enjoyment of their land
what are the three kinds of nuisance stated in the case of Lord Lloyd in Hunter and Canary Wharf
- nuisance by encroachment
- nuisance by direct physical injury
- nuisance by interference with a neighbours quiet enjoyment of their land
which case stated the three kinds of private nuisance
Lord Lloyd in Hunter v Canary Wharf
what is nuisance by encroachment
e.g tree branches hanging over a fence or roots interfering with neighbours house foundations
what is nuisance by direct physical injury
e.g driving my car directly into neighbours garden
what is nuisance by interference with a neighbours quiet enjoyment of their land
e.g playing music really loud stopping neighbours from sleeping
what are the characteristics of a private nuisance
- the claimant must have an interest in the land
- there must be unreasonable use of the land which led to the nuisance
- the claimant must suffer some harm
an interest in the land
in effect a person who is in exclusive possession of the land is regarded as having an interest in the land
successful interest in the land case
foster v warblington udc
unsuccessful interest in the land case
malone v laskey
what are the five factors the court will consider when determining an unreasonable use of the land
- sensitivity of the claimant
- duration and time of the nuisance
- character of the area
- reasonable foreseeability of the type of damage
- malice on behalf of the defendant
case for sensitivity of the claimant and what is it
abnormally sensitive claimants or using land for an unusual purpose that makes it sensitive to disruption are unlikely to succeed in a claim.
the standard of tolerance is that of the reasonable perso and ordinary use
robinson v kilvert
case for duration and time of nuisance
halsey v esso petroleum co ltd
exceptions in crown river cruises ltd v kimbolton fireworks ltd
character of the area and case
it is no defence in a case of private nuisance to argue that the nuisance was there long before the claimants came to the land.
miller v jackson
sturges v bridgman
what is reasonable foreseeability of the damage
to succeed in an action for private nuisance it does not need to be shown that the defendant has taken reasonable care to avoid causing a nuisance but the type of nuisance does have to be reasonably foreseeable
acts of malice on behalf of the defendant and case
an act of malice can mean a case succeeds despite the claimant being abnormally sensitive or the use of the land not being unreasonable
hollywood silver fox farm ltd v emmett
the claimant must suffer some harm
private nuisance is not actionable per se, some loss, inconvenience or damage must be caused
when is an occupier liable
- if the nuisance was created by an act of a stranger the occupier is liable if they know or should know about it
- if the nuisance was created by and act of nature the occupier is liable if they know or should know about it
- if the nuisance was created by the previous owner the current occupier is liable if they know or should know about it.
when is a landlord liable
- if the landlord authorises the tenant to commit a private nuisance
- at the date of letting the landlord knows or should know about the nuisance
- a private nuisance was created during a tenancy and there is no agreement between the landlord and tenant that it is the tenants responsibility to fix the nuisance
what are the main defences to private nuisance
statutory authority
prescription
what is statutory authority
a defence available when a defendant can show their actions were authorised by law such as planes flying overhead
what is prescription and a case
a defence that the defendant has a right to act in a particular way because they have done so for 20 or more years
could not be used in sturges v bridgman - not how long the act has been going but how long it has been a nuisance
what are the remedies for private nuisance
damages, injunctions and abatement
what is abatement
self help - removing the nuisance from your land if you can for example cutting down overhanging branches
injunctions
granted at the discretion of the court. injunction in miller v jackson refused
damages
in cases of encroachment or damage to the land the damages will be equal to the damage caused on the land. in cases of enjoyment of the land it will be the reduction of the amenity value