private nuisance Flashcards
definition
an interference with a persons enjoyment of their land
what are the three kinds of nuisance stated in the case of Lord Lloyd in Hunter and Canary Wharf
- nuisance by encroachment
- nuisance by direct physical injury
- nuisance by interference with a neighbours quiet enjoyment of their land
which case stated the three kinds of private nuisance
Lord Lloyd in Hunter v Canary Wharf
what is nuisance by encroachment
e.g tree branches hanging over a fence or roots interfering with neighbours house foundations
what is nuisance by direct physical injury
e.g driving my car directly into neighbours garden
what is nuisance by interference with a neighbours quiet enjoyment of their land
e.g playing music really loud stopping neighbours from sleeping
what are the characteristics of a private nuisance
- the claimant must have an interest in the land
- there must be unreasonable use of the land which led to the nuisance
- the claimant must suffer some harm
an interest in the land
in effect a person who is in exclusive possession of the land is regarded as having an interest in the land
successful interest in the land case
foster v warblington udc
unsuccessful interest in the land case
malone v laskey
what are the five factors the court will consider when determining an unreasonable use of the land
- sensitivity of the claimant
- duration and time of the nuisance
- character of the area
- reasonable foreseeability of the type of damage
- malice on behalf of the defendant
case for sensitivity of the claimant and what is it
abnormally sensitive claimants or using land for an unusual purpose that makes it sensitive to disruption are unlikely to succeed in a claim.
the standard of tolerance is that of the reasonable perso and ordinary use
robinson v kilvert
case for duration and time of nuisance
halsey v esso petroleum co ltd
exceptions in crown river cruises ltd v kimbolton fireworks ltd
character of the area and case
it is no defence in a case of private nuisance to argue that the nuisance was there long before the claimants came to the land.
miller v jackson
sturges v bridgman
what is reasonable foreseeability of the damage
to succeed in an action for private nuisance it does not need to be shown that the defendant has taken reasonable care to avoid causing a nuisance but the type of nuisance does have to be reasonably foreseeable