Private Enforcement Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who is the claimant?

A
  • Natural person
  • Legal person: Sinochem Heilongjiang v Council - Has acquired legal personality following the law governing its constitution or is treated as an independent legal entity by EU institutions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the ways in which a claimant may seek private enforcement against an EMPLOYER?

A
  • Direct effect principle
  • Indirect effect principle
  • Mangold principle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

For DIRECT EFFECT, what are the conditions and cases that should be mentioned?

A

• Right must be worded in sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional manner

  • – Established in Van Gend en Loos
  • – Van Duyn: Directive’s provisions, specifically

• Time for implementation of the Directive must have passed
— Ratti

• Must bring against State or an emanation of state

  • – Marshall
  • – Foster: Emanation of state provides public service, is under control of the State and has special powers beyond normal rules
  • – Farrell: BUT don’t need to be both under state control AND have special powers
  • – Fratelli Constanzo: City Councils are always considered emanations of State
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

For INDIRECT EFFECT, what are the conditions and cases that should be mentioned?

A

• Right can be interpreted in line with EU law

  • – Established in Von Colson
  • – Marleasing: Can use legislation pre-dating the Directive; interpret domestic law ‘as far as possible’, so can omit words

• Cannot distort the meaning of domestic law
— Wagner Miret

• Cannot impose criminal liability
— Luciano Arcaro

• If time for implementation has not passed, cannot use indirect effect
— Adelener

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For MANGOLD, what are the conditions and cases that should be mentioned?

A

• Whether nat’l law discriminates against an EU general principle

  • – Mangold: Discriminated against age (Art 21)
  • – Charter of Fundamental Rights: Compare against this

• Limitations: Does Charter right require additional legislation to protect it?
— AMS: Art 27 must be contained in EU and national laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the ways in which a claimant may seek private enforcement against a STATE?

A

• State liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How are remedies to be granted in general?

A

• If breach of MS’s EU obligations found, up to MS to determine ‘interim relief’ to compensate claimant
— Factortame I

• MS must have laws and procedures in place to protect citizens’ right to protection under EU law (national system provide procedure)
— Unibet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

For remedies, explain principle of equivalence.

A

• Rules governing actions for safeguarding an individual’s rights under [EU] law = Rules governing similar domestic actions
— Von Colson: Can’t just limit compensation to a nominal penalty amount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For remedies, explain principle of effectiveness.

A

• Must allow the exercise of rights under EU law with reasonable ease
— Factortame I

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For remedies, explain principle of procedural autonomy.

A

• Up to MS to determine how EU rights of citizens can be protected in law
— Rewe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly