PRIVATE DISPUTES: s8 CA Flashcards
Who can they apply to
anyone under 18, but only 16 and 17 yo in exceptional circumstances
Exceptional circumstances for 16/17 yo s8 order
RE M (IMMIGRATION) - NO relatives living in UK sufficently exceptional to make residence order that lasted until 18th irthday
3 types?
1) Child arrangement order
2) Specific Issue order
3) Prohibitive steps order
CAOs
Used to be divided into RESIDENCE and CONTACT, but changed by FCA 2014 to prevent a sense of winners and losers
SIOs
Allows court to rule on a specific issue that is related to an aspect of PR
Re C (HIV TEST)
CANT BE USED IF RESULT ACHIEVABLE BY CAO
PSOs
Stops P from doing something they would normally be able to under PR
What are restrictions to s8 orders?
1) Must be related to PR -> NvN: trying to force a get be granted to W, not under s8 is adult law -> Religious Marriage Act 2002
2) No power to make order that is same as other orders under different law: Re H
3) Cant grant PSO/SIO if trivial -> Re C: taking C on holiday against Ps wishes NO
4) Must be precise -> Re G (CONTEMPT:COMMITAL)
Conditions can be attached to s8 orders
s11(7)
- how s8 order is to be effected
- impose conditions on anyone mentioned in order
- make order/part of order valid for specific time period
Due to it being a vast power, court has restricted how conditions can be applied s8 orders under s11(7)
1) Cant raise new issue:N vN
2) Cant be incompatiable with main issue: BIRMINGHAM CC v H
3) Cant effect P’s fundamental rights: Re E (IMPOSITION OF CONDITONS)
4) Cant allow ‘back door’ to seperate orders D v N (CONDITIONS)
5) Must be enforceable : B v B 6:30 bedtime no way
Who can apply for s8 orders
1) those with automatic right who have PR
2) anyone else who has leave of court
Granting leave for applying for s8 order?
s10(9)
- Nature of application
- COnnection to C
- Risk of appllication disrupting C
- Paramouncy principle doesnt apply because is only granting a permission to next step
Limiting leave to apply for s*?
s91(4)
Prevents C suffering distress from constantly having to defend s8 order requests
ONLY is future applications are llikely to be ‘frivilous, vexatious or unreasonable’