Privacy Law Flashcards
What is Article 8 of the European Convention on human rights?
This states that everyone has the right of respect to their private life, their home and their correspondence.
What has case law developed in terms of article 8?
In alleged cases where privacy has been breached use criterion to decide if article 8 rights are engaged - that is whether there may have been a breach of those rights.
This criterion asses whether there is of was a REASONABLE EXPECTATION TO PRIVACY.
Location can be a player but equally so can nature of the event or the situation.
What can a judge do to protect privacy?
Make an injunction to forbid publication of the material.
Or if it has already been published order the publisher to pay damages or injunct further publications
How can article 8 interact with health?
Case law has established that there is normally such a reasonable expectation of privacy as regarding information concerning including mental health.
What is the case law regarding health? (CCTV)
Peck V UK:
It was ruled by the European court of human rights that the broadcasting my TV companies of CCTV footage of a mans suicide attempt in a public street in which footage he was recognisable breached his privacy rights under article 8 because the incident concerned his health.
In this footage broadcasters made an unsuccessful attempt to blur his face. The footage showed him being stopped by police. It was released by the council to showcase their new CCTV cameras and how it had saved his life.
What is case law regarding health? (Drugs)
Naomi Campbell V Mirror Newspapers:
In this case the House of Lords ruled that:
Even though Campbell accepted that the Mirror acted in the public interest to expose her use of drugs the newspaper had breached her privacy by exposing too much detail of her narcotics anonymous therapy including a photograph of her leaving the premises used by the NA group so making it hard for her to continue the therapy.
The House of Lords therefore ruled that publication of this detail of her therapy and that picture breached her rights under article 8.
How does article 8 interact with sexual relationships?
Case law has established that there is normally such a reasonable expectation of privacy as regards information concerning sexual relationships including those that are already adulterous or involve the use of prostitutes.
What is the case law surrounding sexual relationships?
Mosely V Newsgroup Newspapers:
The high court ruling was that exposure by the news of the world newspapers using footage and recordings gained undercover as his participation in adulterous sexual activities in an orgey with prostitutes was a breach of his privacy.
For this activity there was no public interest justification. Therefore the high court ruled under article 8.
How does article 8 interact with children?
Because of their immaturity, emotional vulnerability are more likely to be regarded by courts as needing protection in civil privacy law than adults are.
Article 8 specifically refers to family life so that a child has a reasonable expectation to privacy irrespective of location and so their privacy can be breached if they are filmed or photographed without parental consent even in a public space.
What is the case law regarding children?
Weller V associated news:
The high court judge ruled that publication of photos taken of Paul Wellers children and published on Mail online showing the expressions on their faces during a family afternoon our with their farther with material which also identified them by their name breached their privacy rights in that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy because of the nature of the family occasion even though they were in a public space and their was no relevant debate of public interest.
How does article 8 relate to undercover of Longshot?
In a privacy lawsuit the method by which the information was obtained will be considered by the court; so that the fact that a person has been photographed or filmed or recorded without being aware of this at the time means they are more likely to succeed in a privacy lawsuit because they may have reasonably expected the situation was private.
How does article 8 relate to a history of harassment?
A person who has been repeatedly harassed by photographers may be more likely to persuade a court in a privacy lawsuit that such activity and/or publication of information gained by such activity including images would breach or has breached article 8 right by limiting the human rights to social interaction.
What is the case law concerning a history of harassment?
Princess Caroline of Monaco V Germany:
In 2004 the European court of Human Rights ruled that even though as regards photographs Princess Caroline complained about she was without doubt pictured in public places she nevertheless had in the circumstances which lead to the case a right to privacy so therefore it was ruled under article 8.
However PUBLIC PLACES ARE NOT NORMALLY PRIVATE FOR ADULTS UNLESS IN A CASE OF HARRASSMENT.
How does proportionality relate to article 8?
Media organisation can avoid a law suit by not publishing some detail concerning part of an image or footage.
What is clause 6 of the Editors Code?
All pupils should be free to complete their time at school without intrusion.
They must not be approached without with out schools approval.
Children under 16 must not be interviewed without consent.
Children under 16 must not be paid for material involving their welfare unless it is clearly in the child’s interest.
Editors must not use a guardians fame as justification.