PRIVACY AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Flashcards
Appropriation
D uses P name or image for commercial purposes
Ex. cereal manufacturer uses tiger woods on box without permission
- newsworthiness exception (sports illustrated article)
- not limited to celebrities
Intrusion
INVASION OF Ps SECLUSION that would be highly offensive to an average person
Ex. wiretapping, intercepting of intimate communications, etc…
-MUST HAVE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY (home, hotel room, bathroom, dressing room, etc…)
False Light ((NO IN FLORIDA))
D must widely disseminate a MATERIAL FALSEHOOD that would be highly offensive to an average person
-does not have to be defamatory, just FALSE (religious beliefs, etc..)
((FLORIDA) NO FALSE LIGHT but there is “DEFAMATION BY IMPLICATION”–> prejudices the Plaintiff in the eyes of a substantial and respectable minority in the community)
Disclosure
D widely disseminates CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION that would be highly offensive to an average person
-accurate but sensitive
-newsworthiness exception→ INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
Ex. Mitt Romney’s health as it pertains to presidency→ NO TORT
Ex. My health as it pertains to Obama Care→ TORT
-must be genuine and truly CONFIDENTIAL
Ex. if you disclose the information and widely disseminate information not truly confidential
Affirmative Defenses for Privacy (2)
- consent (all 4)
2. privilege (FALSE LIGHT and DISCLOSURE)
2 Business Torts
- Misrepresentation
2. Interference with Business relations
Misrepresentation (business tort) (2)
- intentional
2. negligent
Intentional Misrep (business tort) (6)
- misrep (past/present fact)
- scienter (knew/believed false or no basis for)
- intent (to induce or refrain)
- causation (actual reliance)
- justifiable reliance
- damages (actual pecuniary loss)
-NO DEFENSES
Negligent Misrep (business tort) (5)
- misrep (by D in business/profess capacity)
- breach of duty to particular P
- causation (actual reliance)
- justifiable reliance
- damages
- commercial setting
- P foreseeable
Interference with business relations (business tort) (4)
- existence of valid K relationship btwn P and 3rd p OR valid business expectancy of P
- D knowledge of the relationship/expectancy
- intentional interference by D inducing breach or termination of relationship/expectancy
- damages
Malicious Prosecution (5)
- imposition of criminal proceedings against P
- termination in P favor
- absence of probable cause (insufficient facts for reasonable person to believe guilty OR D did not actually believe guilty)
- improper purpose
- damages
- prosecutors are immune from liability
- most juries have extended to CIVIL
Abuse of Process (2)
- wrongful use of process for ulterior purpose
2. definite act or threat against P in order to accomplish purpose