Principles of Quantitative Research Flashcards
criteria of hypotheses
linked to the research question/aim
testable and measurable by the proposed study design
logical in relation to current literature
specified prior to data collection
H1
alternate hypothesis
alternate hypothesis (H?)
H1
null hypothesis (H?)
H0
H0
null hypothesis
types of hypothesis (directions)
- Directional (causal)
- Directional (non-causal)
- Non-directional (causal)
- Non-directional (non-causal)
what must there be for a hypothesis to be directional
clear rationale
what type of hypothesis if exploratory or limited knowledge?
non-directional
causal hypotheses only suitable for what design?
experimental
types of statistical analyses
- Correlation (regression)
- ANOVA (repeated, independent, mixed, factorial)
- Logistic regression
- T-tests (independent, related)
- Multiple regression (mediation, moderation)
- ANCOVA
how do we decide which satistical analysis to carry out?
- Continuous or categorical outcome/DV?
- How many predictors? What type (continuous/categorical)
- If categorical predictors, how many categories?
in what stages of research is there bias?
design
implementation
analysis
publication
bias in design stage
○ Order effects
○ Ceiling/floor effect of task (task too easy or too hard so everyone scores too high or everyone scores too low - so how can we see differences)
○ Participants: sampling, selection and individual differences
bias in implementation stage
researcher bias
response bias
bias in analysis stage
○ Confirmatory hypothesis testing/confirmation bias
○ HARKing
○ P hacking
bias in publication stage
Publication bias (pressure to find significant results - non-significant results struggle to get published)
what is social desirability bias?
“tendency of subjects to deny socially undesirable traits and to claim socially desirable ones…” (Nederhof, 1985)
factors affecting SDB
Impacts on behaviours and self-report
E.g. impacts on self reports of clinical behaviours (Perinelli &Gremigni, 2016)
Self deception and impression management (Paulhus, 1986)
Nederhof (1985)
Situational and personality determinant of social desirability bias
ways to address SDB
Social desirability scales
E.g. Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale (1964) - Shortened versions also developed
The social desirability scale (SDS, 2001)
WEIRD sampling - who and what does it stand for
Henrich et al., 2010
§ Western § Educated § Industrialised § Rich § Democratic
how much to WEIRD samples make up
represent up to 80% of study ppts, but only 12% of the worlds population
impact of WEIRD samples
WEIRD populations are outliers on many psychological phenomena (Henrich et al., 2010)
Demonstrates a lack of cultural diversity in psychology research
Validity and generalisability questionable
Addressing WEIRD samples
Rad, Martingano & Ginges (2018)
□ Reviewed psychological science papers
□ Lack of sample information
Suggestions for authors, journal editors and reviewers to reduce issues related to WEIRD samples and foster more representative psychological research
Research still continues to use WEIRD samples…