Principles of Insurance Regulation Flashcards
The Allocation of Regulatory Powers
a. Paul v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that insurance is not commerce under the Commerce Clause
b. U.S. v. South-Eastern Underwriters overruled Paul, holding that transactions can be commerce.
c. The National Association of Insurance commissioners quickly prepared and lobbied for Congress to return regulatory authority to the states, which it did by passing the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945.
i. “No act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance . . .”
1. Excepted: Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, unless regulated by the States
ii. Rejects the “dormant” commerce clause by specifically stating that “the business of insurance . . . shall be subject to . . . the several states . . .”
Rationales for Solvency Regulation
- Insurer’s use policyholder instead of lenders to fund their operations
a. Policyholders can’t monitor and set terms like lenders can - Public policy for ensuring policyholders’ claims are paid
The Tools of Solvency Regulation
- The NAIC’s Financial Standards and Accreditation Program
a. Accredited state insurance departments are permitted, but not required, to defer to the solvency regulation of an insurer’s state of domicile, so long as that state of domicile is itself accredited. - Accounting and reporting
- Capital requirements – most fundamental
a. Fixed capital requirements
b. Risk-Based Capital (RBC) requirements – much more important
i. Required capital depends on the insurer’s (1) riskiness and (2) size - Reserve requirements
- Investment restrictions
- Financial monitoring – Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS)
- State guaranty funds – funded by insurer licensing
Anthem Health Plans of Maine v. Superintendent of Insurance
Plaintiff wanted to increase its rates by 9.2% for a 3% profit/risk margin, but the commissioner determined the right balance between consumers and insurer was a 5.2% increase for a 1% margin.
Some states regulate insurance rates to ensure rates are neither excessive for consumers nor inadequate for insurers’ financial integrity.
Allstate Insurance Company v. Schmidt
The plaintiffs were fined for violating a statute that prohibited basing “any standard or rating plan” on an applicant’s length of driving experience. Plaintiffs argued the statute didn’t apply to underwriting, but only to rate making.
If a statute is ambiguous as to whether it applies to underwriting or to setting insurance rates, a court should give effect to all parts of the statute to clarify the ambiguity.
Policy Form Regulation
i. States regulate the content of insurance policies in consumer-oriented markets
1. Cannot be unfair, ambiguous, unreasonable
2. Compliance with state rules
Market Conduct Regulation
i. Advertising/marketing restrictions
ii. Resolving claims
Residual Market Mechanisms
i. Insurance Information Institute, Residual Markets (2009)
1. States provide auto coverage for those who can’t get it in the private market
i. Patrick O. Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
1. Facts: Plaintiff alleged discrimination under the Fair Housing Act when defendants used credit scores to determine eligibility for its housing insurance products. However, the McCarran-Ferguson Act states that Congress cannot impede any state laws that regulate insurance. Texas law permits insurance companies to use credit scores.