Principles of infographics Flashcards
3 Characteristics of a good infographics
Utility
Soundness
Beauty
Utility
With respect to utility, infographics must employ an objectives based approach. Essentially, the utility of an infographic is measured by how it enables a brand to reach its objectives.
The utility of explorative and narrative infographics
explorative infographics provide information in an unbiased fashion, enabling viewers to analyse it and arrive at their own conclusions. This approach is best used for scientific and academic applications, in which comprehension of collected research or insights is a priority. Narrative infographics guide the viewers through a specific set of information that tells a predetermined story. This approach is best used when there is a need to leave readers with a specific message to take away, and should focus on audience appeal and information retention.
Soundness
Good infographics also communicate something meaningful. Communicating a message worth telling provides readers with something of value. While infographics can be a powerful vehicle of communication, they are sometimes produced arbitrarily or when a cohesive and interesting story isn’t present. If the information itself is incomplete, untrustworthy, or uninteresting, attempting to create a good infographic with it is more than a fool’s errand; it’s impossible.
Beauty
how it is designed—is also important. With this in mind, there are two things to consider: format and design quality. If an inappropriate format is used, the outcome will be inferior. Similarly, if the design misrepresents or skews the information deliberately or due to user error, or if the design is inappropriate given the subject matter, it cannot be considered high quality, no matter how aesthetically appealing it appears at first glance.
Illustration
“[Illustration] can help showcase and bring things to life, but there’s a fine line between [this and] it becoming distracting. It should be more of a supporting than a leading role. If the designer isn’t careful, what he’s designing can become purely an illustration, rather than an infographic. You want the illustration to support the story that the data is telling, rather than detract from it
Illustration appropriateness in narrative and explorative approaches
For example, illustration can distract and would not be appropriate for an explorative infographic, because people will spend time looking at the visuals while trying to determine what the message is. As we’ve mentioned, the sequence should always be information first, design second. However, the message in a narrative infographic has already been established. Therefore, this is a case where good illustration is capable of playing that supporting role we referenced earlier.
When else can illustration be harmful
Illustration can also be harmful if it misleads people when used improperly, not because illustration is innately misleading. The most common mistake we encounter is the accidental distortion of the data’s display. We also frequently see people who use illustration to hide the fact that their message is either incomplete or meaningless.
4 main types of relationships displayed by infographics
Nominal comparison
Time series
Ranking
Part to whole
Nominal comparison
Nominal comparisons represent a nominal scale; their function is to display several subcategories’ quantitative values so that they can be easily compared to each other. An example of the type of message that ought to be conveyed through this type of comparison is that the value of X is larger than that of Y, or that the value of B is twice as large as the value of C.
Best way to show a nominal comparison
Quantitative values in a nominal comparison graph are represented by categorical subdivisions (eg. B or C) are independent of one another. They should therefore be designed in such a way that communicates the uniqueness of each value. Bar graphs work really well for this type of relationship—especially if the scale is large and you want to highlight the differences between the values. You can also shorten the range and replace bars with simple data points, known as a dot plot.
Time series
A time series relationship consists of a number of relationships between categorical quantitative values that are distributed across divisions of time. Time series graphs are used to show trends, or how values change over time. They take a single measure for each line and plot change (positive and negative) in its quantitative value over time. These are the most popular types of graphs used in business
Best way to show time series
The most commonly used graphs to show time series relationships are lines (with continuous data) and vertical bars (with discrete data). Dot plots can also be used, as well as a dot plot with lines connecting the various points. You’ll want to avoid horizontal bar charts. We typically represent time as something that moves from left to right, rather than top-down.
Ranking
Graphic ranking relationships are all about communicating the ordering—from highest to lowest, or vice versa—of quantitative values of a set of subcategories
Best way to show ranking
If the goal is to show ranking, then you want to use a graph type that brings attention to the quantitative values of each subcategory. Bar graphs (vertical and horizontal) are extremely useful for visualizing ranking relationships; the ordering of categorical subdivisions should be selected according to the purpose of highlighting the highest values (descending order) or the lowest values (ascending order). Dot plots can also be used, if narrowing the quantitative scale aids in the display of the ranking relationship.
Part to whole
The goal in graphing a parts-to-whole relationship is to show how a set of categorical subdivisions’ quantitative values relate to one another as parts of a whole. By displaying a ratio, a part to-whole graph uses percentages as the unit of measure. When graphing part-to-whole relationships, the sum of all individual quantitative values must always add up to 100 percent. A common example of when part-to-whole relationships can be used is when people want to show budget breakdowns; essentially what percentage of a budget is used for what.
How to best show part to whole
Pie charts are the most common graph types used for partto-whole relationships; however, they have their limitations. You want to avoid using a pie chart if you have more than a handful of categorical subdivisions. A stacked bar chart is also a good option; this is especially true if you would like readers to be able to compare the composition of two separate stacked bars, with the same categorical subdivisions. For example, if you wanted to show the favourite colours of students from three separate classrooms. Bar (horizontal and vertical) graphs and dot plots can be useful as well, but both are less popular than those previously mentioned for this type of relationship.