principles and conventions of drafting Flashcards
document should reflect all relevant legal issues
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
- is a covenant required?
- is the RC satisfying the “reasonableness” test required for it to be enforceable?
document should reflect all relevant legal issues
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
- restrictions on selling SH (to not compete with business of Target company) required to protect B
- how should those restrictions (RCs) be drafted to be enforcable?
Why a deed?
- document required to be executed as a deed
- desirable to have a limitation period arising from the contract of TWELVE years (deed) rather than 6 (agreement under hand)
- questionable whether VALUABLE CONSIDERATION is being provided by a party (if deed - valuable consideration need not be given for the document to be binding)
Imposing obligations
“shall”
or
“must”
signifying future
“will”
signifying creating rights or options
“map”
singular or plural?
“none” and “any = followed by a verb in the singular
collective nouns (“committee”, “board”) = treated as singular or plural (but be consistent)
dates, times, and figures
MAKE CLEAR WHETHER INCLUSIVE OR EXCLUSIVE OF THE FIRST AND LAST DAYS
“from and including/excluding”
“by” –> “on or before”
“after” –> “from and excluding”
“until”/”to” –> “to and including”
“between” –> is 1st and last day inclusive or exclusive?
beware of excluded middle
what if X is exactly that number?
say:
“£100 or under”
“under and including £100”
“The Buyer shall pay for the goods within 21 days”
21 DAYS OF WHAT?
delivery?
receipt of invoice?
BE CLEAR
Clause A begins “subject to Clause B”
Clause B overrides Clause A
Clause A begins “notwithstanding clause B”
Clause A overrides clause B
Clause A begins “notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement”
Clause A overrides all other clauses
Clause A is “without prejudice” to clause B
nothing in Clause A impairs effectiveness of Clause B
use of ‘and’ and ‘or’
Ambiguity construed by courts against person trying to rely on it (‘or’ interpreted conjuctively!)
(Federal Steam v Department of Trade & Industry)