Primate Cognition, Communication and Culture Flashcards
What is cognition
the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses
How can a thought process in cognition be summarised
first, perception of external stimuli, followed by encoding the information in the brain that leads to judgement, which is then followed by actions and responses
Define intelligence
Ability to easily learn or understand things and to deal with new and difficult situations
Involves the notions of adaptability and flexibility
What does ‘cognitive abilities’ encompass?
How can cognitive abilities be studied
both cognition and intelligence, and includes the capacities to learn, to understand causality, to reason, to memorize and process memories and to communicate, among many other abilities
by behavioural expressions that reflect their strength and presence, such as behavioural flexibility, behavioural complexity, modifications of the environment, manipulation of objects or of people.
When do we consider species to be intelligent?
How would this relate to their cognitive abilities ?
species that shows a high behavioural repertoire, or shows the ability to
manipulate conspecifics, is considered as intelligent, and thus is inferred to have developed higher
cognitive abilities.
What are the 2 key types of cognition
What does this splitting of cognition assume
Social cognition (How information in and from social contexts are acquired, processed and used)
physical cognition (How information about the physical world are acquired, processed and used)
specific selective pressures have shaped specific cognitive abilities.
What are 3 types of physical cognition
Spatial cognition
Timing cognition
Numerical cognition
not an exhaustive list
What are 3 types of social cognition
Social learning
Theory of mind
Social emotion
not exhaustive
Give an example of non primates showing specific adaptions in cognitive abilities
, in the Western scrub-jay, a corvid living in North-America, individuals display amazing spatial memory, as they are able to remember up to 30.000 food cache locations; they also can retrieve fast-decaying food quicker, so they have an understanding on how long a food will last; they are also able to observe others and pilfer their caches, and they can deceive stealers through re-caching or by faking caches. These birds have a better spatial memory and social intelligence than most primates.
What are the 2 main schools of cognitive theory
the information-processing
school, (Sternberg) and the assimilation and accommodation school (Piaget)
What does the information processing theory of cognition assume
information is processed by the
brain, like a computer would do, rather than being automatic responses to a stimulus.
How does the information processing theory of cognition try to understand thought
attempts to understand the thoughts and reasoning processes by comparing the mind, or the brain, to a sophisticated computer system designed to acquire, process, store and use information in specific ways: here, the mind functions like a biological computer responsible for analysing information from the environment.
In information-processing, logic and neuronal causality are important.
How does Piaget’s theory try to understand cognition
Assimilation: interpreting the world based on previous experience (person‘s internal model)
Accommodation: changes to the internal model by adjusting to experience
in Piaget, subjectivity, experience and flexibility are important
What is comparative cognition
What is an advantage of this
the study of the mechanisms and origin of cognition between various species.
It has the advantage to investigate the proximate mechanisms, or how information is processed and used, but also to have an ultimate approach, by comparing closely related species to tackle the evolution of cognition.
How is comparative cognition studied
What are the advantages and disadvantages of each method
Lab experiments:
++ controlled conditions, can narrow down to specific tasks, usage of replicable paradigms
- - lack of ecological relevance, captive populations
Field studies:
++ ecologically relevant
- - experiments difficult to realize, observations often anecdotical, hard to control all parameters, ethical issue
How does primate brain size relate to cognitive abilities
Deaner (2007) found across all primate groups, overall primate brain size is positively correlated with cognitive abilities
What are the key hypotheses for the evolution of cognition across primates?
Ecological-intelligence hypothesis
Social-intelligence hypothesis
Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis
Cultural intelligence hypothesis
General intelligence hypothesis
Describe the ecological intelligence hypothesis
main selective pressure for large
brains and high cognitive abilities is ecological, mostly food resources
the challenges primates face are to find, remember, and access food
What cognitive abilities are associated with the ecological intelligence hypothesis
→ spatial memory
→ associative learning (the association between external clues and food locations or food timing)
→ explorativeness
How well do chimps remember food locations
Wild chimpanzees remember the locations of food resources up to three years after their last visit
How are locations arranged in a chimp brain?
What does this mean?
within a mental mal, which can be manipulated and orientated depending on where the individual is located. Chimpanzees, thus, do not need to use landmarks, they have a Euclidian map.
How did Normand (2009) show chimps have a Euclidian map of food locations
This has been shown by how chimpanzees approach food locations, which takes place from many directions, with a decrease of travel speed as the location gets closer
How does a marmosets location system/mental map compare to chimps
marmosets also have a Euclidian map, as they approach the same feeding tree from several directions. These marmosets feed on up to 13 different trees every day, and across a year they feed on up to 150 species of trees.
Do all primates have Euclidian maps
No
other primates use route-based maps and
landmarks, meaning they will always use the same routes from one location to the next, and they use
particular marks in the landscape to find their way
Give an example of primates using landmarks
In two species of lemurs, individuals travel from one food patch to the next neighbouring food patch, which most likely are visible from the first location. Second, they travel in straight lines and show a
lot of backtracking, where they use the same routes on the way back. In these species, their traveling
patterns suggest a landmarks usage, but they may actually have a Euclidian map which usage is
limited due to the paucity of substrates and traveling limitations due to the topography
How does diet affect brain size according to the Ecological intelligence hypothesis
fruits =
- dispersed
- seasonal
leaves=
- evenly distributed
- not seasonal
Consequently, these food types pose different ecological and cognitive challenges, where searching and finding fruits is much more challenging than searching and finding leaves. A main consequence of this differential is that frugivore species have larger brains than folivore species
Can we predict brain size from diet
How does this compare with performance in cognitive tasks?
There is plenty of evidence that primate brains can be predicted by their diet, with frugivore having larger brains than omnivores, which have larger brains than folivores
habitat generalists outperform habitat specialists in cognitive tasks
What are habitat generalists
Generalists include species that can thrive in many different types of habitats,
while specialists are constrained by living in specific environments and habitats
Why does the approach of ecological specialisation rather than diet specialization challenges the view of frugivore versus folivore when it comes to cognitive ability
what seems to matter is the habitat rather than the diet because ecological specialization with regard to habitat, not to diet, explain observed cognitive differences.
Give a summary of the relationships between ecological factors
- Primate brain size predicted by diet: frugivore > omnivore > folivore
(DeCasien et al., 2017) - Habitat generalists outperform habitat specialists
→ BUT ecological specialization with regard to habitat, not to diet, explain observed cognitive differences
Henke von den
Malsburg et al., 2020
What hypothesis has The ecological intelligence hypothesis been directly linked to
the extractive foraging hypothesis
What is the the extractive foraging hypothesis
proposed to explain the higher cognitive abilities of great apes and is also proposed for high cognitive abilities of humans.
Here, the main idea is that high cognitive abilities of great apes are adaptations for exploiting a variety of high-energy embedded foods through intelligent tool use and its social transmission
Does the extractive foraging hypothesis just apply to primates
no
also used to explain high cognitive abilities in some species of birds, like crows and parrots.
According to the extractive foraging hypothesis, what is the pathway from apes to humans in terms of cognition
in great apes, embedded food is seasonal, and apes learn to use tools to dip, fish, excavate, open and remove food stuff which are embedded, such as termites, ants, honey and nuts.
While in great apes, reliance on tools is only seasonal, as can be tool use to crack nuts, in human evolution, it is hypothesized that the reliance on tools became more and more important all year-round, making the usage of tools indispensable in
foraging strategies
How does the extractive foraging hypothesis become more of a socio-ecological hypothesis
How does it also help explain advanced cognitive abilities
using tools to access to food and to feed makes that feeding requires complexity in food processing and so this complexity requires social transmission of
techniques
also, the hypothesis proposes that technological prowess and dexterity require advanced cognition, for the motor control to manipulate objects and for the understanding of sequences of actions.
How likely is it that intelligence is linked to tool use in primates
Species in which a precision grip exists show tool use in feeding, and those of which brain size has been measured show a developed parietal area in their neocortex which is the area that enables this precision in tool manipulation
using g as a measure, it appears not only apes appear cleverer than the rest, but also a few other species like macaques, capuchins and baboons, who also show tool use in the wild and in captivity.
Parker, 2015
What cognitive ability does the extractive foraging hypothesis rely on
Which types of primates have this ability
object permanence
all primates have some understanding that things continue to exist out of sight and species that do more extractive foraging have better object permanence
Does tool use imply primates who use them understand causality?
All primates that use tools show that they select tools according to functional properties and that they manufacture tools to make it functional for the task, suggesting that they understand the causality behind its usage.
Give an example of how chimps can understand the physical properties of tools
wild chimpanzees select nut-cracking tools according to multiple physical properties (weight, hardness, size, density); their selection of weight depends on other tools properties and on context; adjustment of selection to forthcoming transport reflects a planning of future actions
Give an experiment showing chimp choice about tools
in chimpanzees with the number of transports of nutcracking tools as function of the distance
of transport, for stones on the top and for wooden hammer on the bottom. Stones are transported over longer distances than wood, because stones are easier to transport due to their size, despite a heavier weight. Walking around
with a stick in the dense forest is not easy, as compared to carrying a stone in the hand. So, they clearly plan which tool to pick depending on where they will use it. Similarly, the probability to choose a tool as function of its weight shows that when the anvil is in a tree, lighter hammers are picked; when the anvil is on the ground, heavier hammers are picked and used.
Sirianni et al., 2015
Describe the Social intelligence hypothesis
Dunbar, 1992/8
Individualized relationships organized in a network
Various relationship attributes: dominance, bond, kinship…
Keep track of own and others’ interactions
→ advanced cognition needed for
cooperation, competition and social
strategizing
What does Dunbar base the rationale of the social intelligence hypothesis on
life in group increases
complexity
due to this high social complexity of primate groups, the social intelligence corresponds to the comprehension of identity, kinship, and relative rank, and this intelligence is expressed by showing flexible behaviour according to who does what and who does what with who.
What are some of the social complexities of living in a group
dominance hierarchies, with the notion of relative rank, where individuals have to understand the rank of oneself, but also the rank of others and of their relatives
triadic interactions, which involve more than two individuals such as in coalitions, re-directed aggressions, third-party affiliations and third-party relationships.
fission-fusion
Give evidence primates have the intelligence to know and remember relative rank
layback experiments have shown that baboons recognize that a dominance hierarchy can be sub-divided into family groups. After an aggression between two females, researchers emitted call sequences mimicking dominance rank reversals between families and within families
duration of looking toward the speaker is longer when dominance is reversed as compared to not reversed, showing the surprise effect and interest of the baboon.
this duration is longer and different when reversal occurs
between families than within families as reversal of rank within families is common (so not so surprising), while between families
it rarely occurs - understand membership in higher order groups, eg families or caste
Why are triadic interactions thought to increase complexity
it decouples rank and power
strategizing individuals must base their decisions not only on observable clues (e.g., large body size or the rank of a single individual) but also on differentiated relationships due to number of coalition partners
Why do individual primates not only monitor their own grooming relationships
coalitions are thought to be intimately linked with grooming, since grooming reinforces social bonds needed for coalitions.
Consequently, individuals have to monitor not only their own relationships but also the relationships, in particular grooming, of other individuals.
What is redirected aggression
What cognitive ability does this show
where an aggressed individual will tend to re-direct this aggression toward a family member of the aggressor, showing they understand kin relationships of others.
Other than redirected aggression, what is another way to see primates understand kinship
Give evidence primates do this
n third-party reconciliation, where a kin individual of the
aggressor reconciliates with the one aggressed on behalf of the aggressor.
Wittig et al., 2007, using playback experiments, baboons that just got threatened respond more strongly to peaceful grunt emitted by kin members of the aggressors than to control vocalizations, and they increased their proximity postconflict after hearing peaceful grunts from kin members.
What skill that primates have shows they understand many attributes of individuals
Give an example of this
Third-party relationships such as recruitment of coalition partners
male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships when they recruit support from other males.
Males consistently chose allies that outranked themselves and their opponents and made such choices considerably more often than would be expected by chance alone. High-ranking males received more solicitations for support in coalitions than lower-ranking males
What characterises fission fusion
What makes it complex
variable sub-grouping that change over time and space
hard to keep tracks of who hangs out with who and who does what with who. Fission-fusion introduces uncertainty in the relationships.
What is a consequence of living in fission-fusion societies?
promotes inhibitory control. Inhibition, such as waiting before getting a reward, is thought to be a high cognitive ability, since inhibition is the suppression of prepotent but ineffective responses in a changing social environment
Does the data support fission fusion primates having better inhibitory control
A comparative analysis of inhibitory control of primates shows that fission-fusion species show higher inhibitory control than non fission-fusion species.
Amici et al., 2013
Why does Dunbar highlight the neocortex in particularly (function)
How does it compare bewteen primates
Neocortex: seat of cognitive process such as reasoning and consciousness
When the size of the neocortex is related to the rest of the brain, apes have a higher neocortex
than old world monkeys, themselves bigger than new world monkeys, themselves bigger than
prosimians. N
Why does Dunbar argue the ecological intelligence hypothesis is incorrect
neocortex is not
related to percentage of fruits in the diet
neocortex is not related to home-range size
Why does Dunbar argue the extractive foraging hypothesis is incorrect
Why is Dunbar’s seemingly correct
neocortex size is not related with extractive foraging
neocortex is strongly related with group size, a proxy for social complexity, making the argument that high social complexity, due to high group size, is positively associated with high cognitive abilities, due to large brain sizes in larger groups.
What is another way to measure social complexity, other than group size ?
How does this relate to neocortex size
the size of grooming
cliques, which is the number of social partners used during grooming sessions, and the size of
grooming networks, which the number of links between partners
Neocortex relative size is larger in species with larger grooming cliques; grooming networks are larger for larger groups, and larger grooming cliques are found in species with larger grooming networks. This relationships between brain size and grooming networks means that when more individuals are involved in social relationships, keeping tracks of these relationships require advanced cognitive skills, pushing for an evolutionary increase of brain size.
What might contradict Dunbar’s findings regarding neocortex being the best proxy for intelligence
Deaner et al., 2007 found that Cognitive abilities better predicted by overall brain size than by neocortex size
Give an example of supposedly complex social behaviours that can be explained by simple rules of thumb
eg sooty mangabeys
- higher-ranking individuals are more likely to stay near two other groomers than low-ranking ones
- higher-ranking contestants in conflicts are more likely to get support than low-ranking and high-ranking individuals are more solicited for support than low-ranking ones
These behaviours seem complex, because they involve more than two partners and because they imply understanding of relative rank relationships
However, these results also can be explained by simple rules such as “intervene only when you outrank the target”, “always intervene on behalf of the aggressor”, “always support the high-rank”, all simple rules of thumb which would imply only understanding of own rank as compared to another individual, rather than processing third-party relationships and related ranks.
Why may brain size not be a good indicator of intelligence
intelligence in insects, where very few neurons allow them to complete relatively complex tasks
What is the idea behind brain enlargement in the social intelligence hypothesis
big brains, neurons are larger due to physiological constraints, but also that in large brains neuronal circuits are replicated, allowing a better precision, a better perception and a better storage capacity
What are some of the higher abilities displayed by apes
include computational thought and ToM
What does the Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis state
in addition to social complexity, intense social competition leads to the development of Machiavellian social strategies to achieve higher social status and fitness, and that this Machiavellian intelligence acts through using manipulation and deception. These abilities, to manipulate and deceive, require mental representations only seen in apes and humans.
Summarise ToM
the ability to understand others mental states and intentions, but also self-awareness
How do we assess self awareness
Which primates are self aware
mirror experiments
We put a mark on the face of a primate, and in front of a mirror we see if those individual notices the mark. If they do, they are aware that what they see is themselves, if they don’t, we conclude they are not self-aware
Apes: yes Monkeys: no
Can primates understand what others are seeing (other than apes)
Macaques understand what others are seeing since macaques follow the gaze of others, and this ability is shared by many other animals such as capuchins in primates, but also goats and dogs.
Name some particularly high cognitive skills that bonobos, chimps, and orangutans possess (4)
self-awareness and representation,
comprehension of other’s knowledge,
comprehension of false beliefs
deception
which other hypothesis has been developed in parallel with the Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis to address great apes’ intelligence?
Cultural intelligence hypothesis
What is the key idea with the cultural intelligence hypothesis
social learning is more efficient than individual exploration, which should lead to learning of skills much faster with social learning than without. Also, an individual’s repertoire of learned skills is boosted by frequent social learning opportunities. Species with frequent opportunities for social learning can afford to increase cognitive power, which in consequence should lead to more heavily cultural species being more intelligent
Summarise the sources of an individual’s set of learned skills as acquired during development according to the cultural intelligence hypothesis
the skills learned through social learning from the population’s
pool of learned skills, and the skills acquired through innovation from its own
asocial (individual)-learning ability (what one learns alone)
when cultural feedback is added, selection on an increased set of learned skills is achieved by improved social learning.
Owing to the high cognitive overlap, social learning improves the asocial (individual)-learning ability (i.e. intelligence).
More learned skills also improve the latter through stronger
experience effects
Which orangutan species is more sociable
In the wild, Sumatran orang-utans are more social than Bornean orang-utans
In the wild, Sumatran orang-utans are more social than Bornean orang-utans. How does this relate to cognition?
Various cognitive skills have been measured, such as innate problem solving, inhibition and exploration style. Sumatran sociable orang-utan show a superior problem-solving ability than less sociable Bornean orang-utans, inhibition is stronger in the more sociable species, and Sumatran orang-utans exploration style is more cautious, while Bornean orang-utans are more rough in their exploration style. Here, it was concluded that there was a stronger selection on cognitive mechanisms underlaying learning in themore social species, confirming predictions from the cultural intelligence hypothesis
What is the general intelligence hypothesis
there had been coevolution of social, ecological and technical skills in primates, including cultural elements.
why is social learning important ontogeny
. Social learning is a particularly
efficient mechanism of ontogenetic canalization (channelling during development), particularly in
large-brained animals
Give 5 modes of primate communication
Olfactory communication Tactile communication Vocal communication Visual communication Multi-modal communication
What are the 3 main elements of any type of communication
a 1) sender emits a 2)signal which is aimed toward a 3) receiver
What are signals
messages that help coordinating behaviour in the interest of both sender and receiver
What do signals in animals give information on
dominance status, phenotypic quality, reproductive status, group-coordination such as contact calls, and anti-predation such as alarm calls
What are the 4 components of communication
signals
motivation
meaning
function
What is the motivation component of communication
the internal state of the actor sending the signal, such as fear, aggression, sexual interest, appeasement
What is the function component of communication
he adaptive advantage of communication, such as:
kin recognition, predator detection, competitor avoidance, friendship formation, mate attraction,
etc…
What is the handicap principle
signals which are not costly cannot evolve
Compare costly and non-costly signals
non-costly signals are hard to decipher and to predict, their outcome is uncertain rendering difficult to be selected;
costly signals (honest or deceptive) convey a selectable function, such as attracting mates or surviving from predators)
What are the different types of costly signal
honest: Sender and receiver have common interests
incompletely honest: Sender and receiver have conflictual interests but share some common ground interests
Deceptive: Sender and receiver have conflictual interests
→ Receiver of deceptive signal must incur a cost
Carazo & Font, 2014
Give an example of a deceptive signal in spiders
Salticid spider: males of a given species deceive females of another species by mimicking courtship tactile signals → attract these decieved females → catch and eat them
How does the deception involved in deceptive signal remain evolutionarily stable
Most of deceptive signals are found in predator-prey interactions where deception is stable because the frequency of dishonest signals is low, so it can evolutionary be maintained because it is hard to be detected and to be counteracted by counterstrategies, due to its low frequency.
Why , in non-human primates, are deceptive signals rare
constraints on false
signalling. These constraints include recognition, habituation, and punishment
Describe recognition as a constraint on false signalling
regular interactions and individual recognition limit the use of deceptive tactics and false signalling
Describe habituation as a constraint on false signalling
individuals rapidly learn to ignore false signals, progressively diminishing the effectiveness of deception; other constraint
Describe punishment as a constraint on false signalling
detailed knowledge about social environment facilitates detection of dishonest individuals. If punishment follows detection, it reduces and negates benefits of acting deceptively.
Is there any deception in non-human primates
subtle deceptive behaviour such as social tools and concealment of information are more difficult to detect so they can evolve
Describe social tools as subtle deception
Give an example
Social tools consist of deceiving an individual, using that individual as a tool:
for example, in baboons, it has been observed that a
juvenile screamed at an older individual who was in possession of a valued food item. Such screams are normally only uttered by an individual when attacked or threatened. As a result of the scream, the youngster’s mother chased off her son’s ‘assailant’, while the youngster was left to take the relinquished food.
Give some examples of colourful displays in primates
What does this reflect
in males, ornaments and colour display, such as the lip uncovering behaviour and red chest triangle in male gelada baboons, or the muzzle colour patterns in drill monkeys, or the colour patterns of some langurs, or the red lips of male sub-nosed monkeys. In these cases, visual display and colour ornaments indicate male quality, resource holding potential and dominance status of these individuals.
Give an example of a vocal costly signal in apes
in orang-utans, Boris, the dominant male in this population, shows higher loud call rates than
subordinates males, in the middle and on the left. Orang-utan’s loud calls are assumed to constitute
honest signals of body male quality (mainly body size).
Fitch & Hauser, 1995
Give a loud costly signal in gorillas
chest beats
larger males have a lower peak frequency of chest beat, meaning that larger males produce louder and deeper sounds when beating up their chest than smaller males. In this case, it suggests that chest beats are honest signals of body male competitive ability
Wright et al., 2021
What are the vocal costly signals for female primates
When do these happen
What do they sound like
copulation calls
Females produce copulation calls during the copulatory act, but they also sometimes continue after the copulation in many primate species
Copulation calls can be grunts as in baboons or screams as in chimpanzees.
Give 2 hypotheses to explain female copulation calls as costly signals
→ Honest signals to advertise reproductive status (Aich et al., 1990)
→ Encourage mate guarding by the consort male (Maestripieri & Roney, 2005)
there are >15
eg nonadaptive by-product of sexual intercourse, the self-stimulation of the occurrence of ovulation, the promotion of synchronization of male and female orgasm, strengthening the pair bond
Give reasons why Roney (2005) may be correct in their hypothesis on female copulatory calls
→ Minimize sperm competition
→ post-copulatory sexual selection
→ Consistent with honest signals of fertility
→ Explains post-copulatory calls
Give examples of olfactory costly signals
in lemurs, where female dominate the males, females use scent marking.
These species are seasonal breeders, so there is a strong female-female sexual competition during this period.
individual heterozygosity correlates positively with diversity of olfactory compounds
ince the odour-genes relationship
predicts health and survival during breeding season, it is suggested that scent marking acts as honest
olfactory ornaments of genetic quality.
Think of sweaty t-shirt study in humans (Wedekind, 1995)
Which social systems are exaggerated sexual swellings associated with
multi-male multi-female social systems
All multimale social systems correspond to species where exaggerated sexual swellings are displayed (Nunn, 1999)
What are female exaggerated sexual swellings associated with
patterns that bias paternity, such as ovulation taking place close to the peak of
swelling, and dominant males’ reproductive success
However, swellings are also associated with patterns that confuse paternity, such as errors in timing of ovulation
What are the 6 hypotheses to explain exaggerated sexual swellings
Best-male hypothesis
- Clutton-Brock & Harvey, 1976
Reliable-quality indicator hypothesis (Pagel, 1994)
Obvious-ovulation hypothesis (Hamilton, 1984)
Many-service hypothesis (Van Noordwijk, 1985)
Many-male hypothesis (Hrdy, 1981; Hrdy & Whiten, 1987)
Graded signal
What is the idea behind the best male hypothesis
swellings serve to incite male-male competition, enabling females to
identify and mate with best phenotype males. Here, there is indirect mate choice by the females,
and paternity certainty is increased
Evaluate support for the best male hypothesis
not compatible with patterns of paternity confusion,
not compatible with non-matching of ovulation with peak of swellings,
not compatible with low-rank males siring,
does not explain gradual increase and decrease in size;
male-male competition does not require females to expose their fertility; weak support
Describe the reliable quality indicator hypothesis
swellings reliably indicate female quality and so swellings evolve under the selective pressure of female-female sexual competition
Evaluate the reliable indicator hypothesis
not compatible with largest swellings in least fertile females like adolescents,
not compatible with male-biased sex-ratio in multi-male multi-female groups, where female-female
competition is the lowest;
predicts larger swellings when breeding is seasonal but opposite is true
(largest in non-seasonal species).
Describe the obvious ovulation hypothesis
evaluate
swellings indicate the timing of ovulation, hereby
increasing paternity certainty and thought to be an incentive for paternal care
incompatible with patterns that confuse paternity (synchrony of swellings and lowranking males siring), and male care not observed apart from possible infant protection.
Describe the Many-service hypothesis
swellings help in promoting mate-guarding and courtship
and where females select the best male for protection against other males, predators and
neighbouring groups. In this case, paternity certainty is increased.
Evaluate the many service hypothesis
compatible with unprecise signals of fertility (since what matters are other benefits than giving paternity to a particular male), compatible with unprecise timing of ovulation around the peak, as it tends to increase length of male protection and consortship, but it is not compatible with low-ranking males siring offspring
Describe the many males hypothesis
swellings serve to attract many males as mating partners. Here, there is confusion of paternity, reduction of risks of infanticide, and even involves female cryptic choice (differential selection of gametes)
Evaluate the many males hypothesis
not compatible with patterns that increase paternity, cannot explain why ancestry small signal would become exaggerated and why a large signal is needed. In fact, a large signal is not always needed as, in some multi-male primates, mating are incited even without swellings like in patas monkeys, vervets and red-tailed monkeys; also, confusion of paternity can be done by concealing ovulation or by not matching ovulation with maximum swelling peak