Primary CVD Prevention Flashcards
Primary goals in CVD prevention
-Blood pressure control and lipid control account for 40% decline in CVD mortality in the last decade -Other risk factors that need to be controlled: smoking and diabetes -Focus on primary prevention, not curing the problem that already exists.
Tools in CVD prevention
-exercise, weight loss, limiting salt/EtOH. -multi-drug therapy and JNC-7 guidelines -community health workers to reach at-risk communities -policy changes
Public health benefits of BP control
-by lowering BP we can reduce heart failure and reduce the risk of stroke, MI and CV death at any age -tight systolic BP control leads to reduced risk of microvascular endpoints, fatal/non-fatal strokes, heart failure and fatal/non-fatal MIs -reduction in these outcomes = fewer hospitalizations/costly interventions = better overall health
Barriers to CVD risk reduction
- Compliance: poor therapy regimen compliance with blood pressure therapy
- High risk hypertensive patients require multiple drugs (at least 3) and still don’t achieve SBP goals.
- Only 20% of patients achieve greater than 80% adherence
- Also, keep in mind that patients who have depression may have lower compliance
- patients are individuals w/unique communities & unique challenges
Major reasons cited for non-adherence to BP meds (6)
- patients forget (55%)
- don’t think it is necessary (14%)
- hate taking meds (7%)
- don’t like being dependent on meds (7%)
- side effects of drugs (6%)
- too expensive (2%).
JNC-7 guidelines in HTN
- start 2 drugs simultaneously if systolic
- BP is > 20 mm Hg or
- diastolic > 10 mm Hg above goal
Major myths in primary CVD precention
- raising HDLs w/drugs saves lives
- tight glycemic control in diabetics improves CV outcomes
- “an aspirin a day keeps the doctor away”
Summary of research regarding “HDL-raising” myth
- Bad of statins: increased blood sugar andglycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels
- Good of statins: removal of routine monitoring of liver enzymes from drug labels
- Bad of statins: potential for generally non-serious and reversible cognitive side effects
- overall: benefits outweigh risk, but primary prevention evidence is slightly less compelling
Summary of research regarding “tight glycemic control” myth
- Higher glucose = higher risk
- However, aggressive glucose control may lead to an increase in mortality
Summary of research regarding “asprin/day” myth
- Works in CAD, and stroke patients
- Recent randomized trials in DM- no benefit
- Benefits in primary prevention are small & offset by risks of major bleeding
- ASA remains recommended in multiple guidelines, but not FDA approved in primary prevention
Conclusions regarding CVD prevention
- Assess global risk in all your patients and treat patients holistically
- Start a statin in high-risk patients with elevated LDL-cholesterol
- Gain patient buy-in and incorporate tools to improve adherence:
- Health care delivery alone is not enough
- Community-based programs are beneficial…
Tools to improve adherence
– Frequent visits and encouragement,
– Once daily or combination drugs,
– Assess for depression & co-factors (alcohol, drugs, etc.)