Prima Facie & Proofs Lecture Flashcards
What are the four options at the close of the prosecutions case open to the defence?
- To made a Prima facie submission. (No case to answer submission) 1st leg May v O’Sullivan
- To make a 2nd leg May v O’Sullivan submission
- Prasad direction
- Defence to call evidence
What is Prima facie?
Each offence is divided up into elements, there must be evidence proving each of the elements to reach a Prima facie case.
What is the first leg of May v O’Sullivan?
No case to answer submission. The burden of proof is on the prosecution from 1st to last.
It is concerned with the possibility of the defendant being convicted and not the probability. Could the defendant be convicted?
The charge will fail if there is no evidence.
What evidence is to be considered on the 1st leg?
Only the evidence which militates in favour of the prosecution. The prosecution evidence is to be taken at its highest. It is a question of law. If rejected then the defence can call evidence.
What is a second leg submission?
It is concerned with the probability of the defendant being convicted and not the possibility.
- should the def be convicted.
- question of fact.
What evidence should be considered on the 2nd leg?
Evidence with all its weaknesses, and taking into account the evidence in favour of the defence.
If a second leg submission is made, can the defence call evidence?
No.
What is a Prasad Direction?
An invitation to a jury by a judge to find the accused not guilty prior to hearing the defence case. (It is not a direction, a judge cannot direct or force the jury to make a decision. It is simply an invitation.)
‘A verdict of guilt would be so unsafe or unsatisfactory, so manifestly unreliable that no reasonable jury could safely act upon it’
Key words
- safe
- unsatisfactory
- so unreliable.
Does Prasad prevent the defence from giving evidence?
No. This is how it differs from a second leg submission. The defence can give evidence.
When would a Prasad be used?
If there is a distinction between the existence of evidence and the reliability of evidence.
An unreliable DV victim who has admitted they lied on multiple occasions. It would be unjust to convict a person just on the unreliable evidence of the victim.
Can prasad apply in the Local Court?
Doney v R says that it does not apply at the Local Court. It states that if Prima facie is evidence then it should be left to the jury (magistrate).
What does DPP reference No 1 of 2017 (2019) HCA state?
If there is evidence (even if tenuous or inherently weak or vague) that is capable of supporting a verdict of guilty, the matter must be left to the jury.
What is the civil standard?
140 evidence act is balance of probabilities
What is criminal standard in prosecution case?
141(1) beyond reasonable doubt
What is the criminal standard in a defendants case?
S 141(2) balance of probabilities