Pretrial Procedures - Right to Jury Trial Flashcards
What are the types of eyewitness identification?
- Corporeal Identification - in-person (lineups)
- Non-Corporeal Identification - NOT in-person & involve police using photo arrays for a wit. to ID the perpetrator of the crime
6th Amendment right to counsel at lineups
- At in-person post-indictment lineup
- NOT at non-corporeal
- D can waive the right if made knowingly & intelligently
Eyewitness ID Procedure - Remedy for violation
Testimony about post-indictment, Pre-trial identification w/out counsel is inadmissible
- BUT wit. can still ID defendant at trial if prosecution can show that the ID has independent reliability
Impermissible Suggestive Identification Procedures
Due Process Rights
D has due process right pursuant to the 5th Amendment (for fed. prosecutions) and 14th Amend. (for state)
- w/ regard to witness’s identification based on ID procedure arranged by police that was impermissibly suggestive
- whether corporeal or non-corporeal
- whether ID took place b/f or after indictment of D
Test for Impermissibly Suggestive ID Procedure
- 2 Prong Test to determine the admiss. of a pre or post indictment corporeal or non-corporeal identification
- Tp prevail, D must show that the procedure was:
- Impermissibly Suggestive AND
- There was subst. likelihood of misidentification
- To have ID admitted, prosecution can offer ev. that the ID was still reliable
What are the factors considered by the court in determining if impermissibly suggestive procedure results in an unreliable identification ?
- Witnes’s opp. to view the D at the time of the crime
- Wit. degree of attention at the time of the crime
- Accuracy of the wit. description of the D b/f the ID
- Level of certainty at time of the identification AND
- length of time b/w crime and ID
What is the Remedy for illegal identification ?
Conviction as the result of a trial where an illegal ID was admitted will be overturned
- Unless, under doctrine of harmless error, the appellate ct. is convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the improperly admitted ID didn’t contribute to the verdict
Preliminary Proceedings - What must occur in order to determine whether a defendant can be held?
Probable Cause to Detain (Gerstein Hearing) - Under 4th Amendment a prelim. hearing must be held to determine if PC exists to hold the defendant.
- No right to counsel
- hearsay evidence can be introduced
- must be held w/in 48 hours of arrest to determine PC
- 4th guarantees D right to be released if no PC
- no remedy if detention is unlawful (other than exclusion of evidence discovered as a consequence of unlawful detainment)
Preliminary Proceedings - Initial Appearance
D must be brought b/f judge who advises D of the charges and his rights & appoints counsel if he is indigent
- judge may also decide whether D should be release b/f trial and the cond. of the release (e.g. bail)
- Accept plea from the D and
- set date for preliminary hearing
Preliminary Proceeding - Arraignment
Court informs D of the crime D has been charged & gets D’s response (ie. plea)
- Ct. may appoint counsel for indigent D
- Can also take place at initial appearance
Preliminary Proceedings - Detention Hearing
Can occur at same time as initial appearance or at seperate hearing
- Ct. determines whether to release D & any conditions for release
- Ct. may set bail
Preliminary Proceedings - Preliminary Hearing to Determine Probable Cause to Prosecute
Subsequent to D’s initial appearance, prelim. hearing may be held to determine if there’s PC to believe D has committed a specific crime
- This is an adversarial proceeding
- D has the right to counsel
- D who has been indicted by grand jury is not entitled to this hearing
Right to Bail
No const. right to bail BUT any denial of bail must comply w/ the Due Process Clause
- Setting excessive bail or refusal to set bail is immed. appealable
Excessive Bail Defined
Under 8th Amendment - Bail set higher than an amount reasonably calculated to endure the D’s presence at trial is excessive
Competency
Incompetency is a bar to trial - Judge has const. duty to investigate and determine the competence of the D to stand trial if ev. is apparant to the judge
- Test - whether the D comprehends the nature of the proceedings against him and has the ability to consult with a lawyer w/ a reasonable degree of rational understanding