Prenups Flashcards
Premarital Agreement (Prenup)
Devises to resolve disputes between spouses in the event of divorce, as well as a means for estate planning in the event of death.
Prenup Req.
Most states require prenups to be in writing and signed by the parties.
Enforceability of Prenups (Invalid Prenups)
In most states, a premarital agreement will be invalidated when there is a court finding of either:
- procedural unfairness in the making of the agreement; or
- substantive unfairness of the agreement itself
Procedural Unfairness (Important Factors)
Include:
- the fullness of disclosure of one’s net worth
- the availability of independent counsel or knowing and voluntary waiver of such rep.
- the timing and presentation of the agreement, giving sufficient time to review before the wedding; and
- the relative bargaining power of the parties, and their relative levels of financial or legal knowledge
Procedural Unfairness: Adequate Disclosure (When it is Not Required)
In general, there must be fair and reasonable disclosure by both parties concerning each party’s property and financial obligations. But disclosure might not be required if:
- there has been a voluntary waiver of this disclosure req.; or
- a spouse has knowledge of or access to financial circumstances of the other spouse
Procedural Unfairness: Voluntariness
All parties must voluntary agree to a prenup. Potential defenses to voluntariness include fraud, misrepresentation, or duress (e.g. making the other spouse sign it the day of the wedding).
Important Factors for Determining the Voluntariness of Signing a Prenup
Courts look at the cumulative facts and circumstances such as:
- timing
- availability
- counsel
- language
- one of these factors alone will not be enough
Substantive Unfairness
Most states hold that there is substantive unfairness if the premarital agreement’s terms or impact are substantively unfair.
Unfairness: Majority Approach v. Minority Approach
- The majority UPAA approach looks at the fairness at time of execution only
- The minority approach looks at fairness at time of K enforcement as well as at formation
UPAA Approach to Unfairness
If you are told that a jurisdiction follows the UPAA, this approach claims that a premarital agreement becomes unenforceable if:
- there was a lack of voluntariness; or
- the court finds that there was lack of adequate disclosure (procedural unfairness); and the agreement was unconscionable (at time of signing).
UPAA Approach: When an Agreement is “Unconscionable”
When there is a large disparity in sophistication and resources that results in one-sided agreement due to inequity in bargaining power.
SM of Prenups: Property Division
Agreements concerning property division are permissible.
SM of Prenups: Waiver of Alimony
- The majority view –> permits waiver of alimony by agreement
- The minority view –> does not allow waiver of spousal support
SM of Prenups: Children
In virtually all states, it is invalid as against public policy for a premarital agreement to abrogate, or even limit, the obligation of a parent to support his or her minor children during or after the marriage. Same thing goes for the UPAA.
SM of Prenups: Sexual Relations
In most states, provisions dealing with the frequency of sexual relations and child-bearing are not enforceable.