Premises: Entry and Search Flashcards
Defining premises
Section 23 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) defines premises as any place and, in particular, includes:
any vehicles, vessels, aircraft, or hovercraft
any off-shore installation
any renewable energy installation
any tent or moveable structure
Most powers of search, including powers to enter and search premises, require you to either have…
‘Reasonable grounds to suspect’ or ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ before you can use them.
It is important that you know which one is required when exercising a particular power.
Grounds to suspect requires a lower level of certainty than grounds to believe.
Both require objective reasoning and you must be able to convey your suspicion or belief to a third person such as a senior officer or a court.
There are no hard and fast rules about what constitutes reasonable grounds to suspect or believe and every situation must be assessed on its own merits.
What constitutes reasonable grounds?
Under Code A of the Pace Act 1984 the grounds for reasonable suspicion has two parts:
- A genuine suspicion in the mind of the officer that he/she will find the object for which the power of search is being used.
- The suspicion must be reasonable, formed on an objective basis from facts, information, and/or intelligence which help make it likely that the object will be found, and that a reasonable person would also draw the same conclusions.
Grounds must be a true representation of the situation and can be derived from many different factors such as the individual’s behaviour, the location, and the time of day.
A good starting point in determining whether you have grounds to enter and search premises for people or evidence is to ask yourself
‘Why do I suspect / believe that the person or evidence I am looking for is in these premises NOW’.
Another good test as to whether you have the necessary grounds to enter and search is to ask yourself ‘If I am wrong and I don’t find the person or evidence inside the premises, will I be able to justify what I have done?’
The legal framework
There are three main areas where officers are given the authority to carry out entry and searches into premises. These are:
Using police powers without a warrant.
On the authority of a warrant issued by a court.
With the consent of the owner.
Any search of premises must fit into one of the three categories above. Any search that doesn’t will be unlawful.
Which two overriding pieces of legislation that govern entry and searches of premises need to be considered first before any search and entry?
These are the Human Rights Act, and Code B of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Codes of Practice.
What does the Human Rights Act 1998 mention with regards to entering and searching a person’s home, place of work or any other premises?
How the state (which includes the Police) should consider an individual’s fundamental rights before doing anything that may infringe upon them.
In the context of entering premises the main Human Rights article to be considered is:
Article 5: The right to respect for private and family life.
When considering your actions that may impact on Article 5 you should think PLAN:
Are your actions Proportionate to the desired outcome? Could you choose a less intrusive way of getting the same outcome?
Are your actions Legal? (i.e. covered by police powers or a warrant).
Are your actions Accountable and can they be justified to a senior officer or a court if necessary?
Are your actions Necessary – and are they done for the public good?
Code B of the Codes of Practice sets out how officers are to carry out their duties when conducting entry and searches of premises, some examples include considerations that:
- Searches made under warrant must be made within three calendar months of the date of the warrant’s issue (6.1),
- Searches must be made at a reasonable hour of the day unless this might frustrate the purpose of the search (6.2),
- The person in charge of a search should normally be the most senior officer present unless a more junior officer is more appropriate, e.g. they may be nominated to be in charge of a search because of their knowledge of the case (2.10). Note, the officer in charge of a case means the officer assigned the specific duties.,
- If a search application is refused, a further application may not be made for those premises unless supported by additional grounds (3.8).