PRELIM Flashcards
Process of influencing others to achieve organizational goals
Leadership
3 Purpose of Leadership
Motivate
Lead
Guide
Standing up for oneself without violating the rights of other
Assertiveness
Trying to convince someone by using reason
Rationality
Making an individual important before making a request
Ingratiation
Offering exchange of favor
Exchange
Coercive
Giving punishment or reward
Sanction
Backing up a request with a threat to damage an infividuals oppurtunity for advancement
Blocking
Getting workers to back up
Coalition
Obtaining support of higher
Upward appeal
People that operate and use financial and material resources
Manpower
Devices that help organization
Machines
Budget allocated
Money
Refers to body of technique
Methods
Physical resources
Materials
Time as resource
Moment
People responsible for planning
Manager
Respect
People follow you because of what you are and what you represent
Personhood
Reproduction
Peope follow because of what youve done for them
People Development
Results
People follow because of what youve done for the organization
Production
Relationships
People follow because they want to
Permission
Rights
People follow because they have to
Position
Gilbert’s D PATHOS SHAF
Dominance
Poise
Aggressiveness
Tolerance for others view
High capacity to attain status
Orderly thinking
Self confidence
Sensitivity to others
High need to achieve
Ambition
Flexibility
Only a select few were born to lead
Trait Theories
3 Trait Theorist
Stogdill
Bass
Gilbert
Start of Trait Theories
Mid 1800’s
Start of Behavioral Theories
Early 1930’s
He developed a profile of successful leaders and traits
Stogdill
He classified intelligence, personality, and abilities
Bass
Found potential leaders has D PATHOS SHAF
Gilbert
Focused on what leaders do and that leadership is a learned behavior
Behavioral Theorist
4 Behavioral Leadership Styles
Autocratic
Democratic
Laissez Faire
Bureaucratic
Make decisions without input from others
POWER, AUTHORITY, NEED FOR APPROVAL
Autocratic
Aka as participative or shared leadership
Members participate
Democratic
Give others freedom to make decisions
Uninvolved in the day to day work
Provides no direction or facilitation
Laissez Faire
By Jenkins and Henderson (1984)
Relies on organization policies and rules
Bureaucratic
Task>Relationships
Autocratic/Authoritarian
Directive behavior
Use coercion
But effective in crisis
Authoritarian/Autocratic
2 way communication
Democratic/Shared or Participative
Abstains from leading
Laissez Faire
Inflexible rules
Bureaucratic
No best way to organize
Leaders should adapt
Contigency Leadership Theory
Leadership style must fit the situation
Effective when he matches leadership style to situational factors
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
(Good to Poor)
Degree which leader enjoy the loyalty or subordinates
Manager-Followers Relationship
(High to Low)
Degree which task is clearly described
Task structure
(Strong to Weak)
Degree which leaders are able to administer rewards and punishment
Manager Power
Start of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
1967
Start of Situational Leadership Theory
2007
Leader adapts style to suit the current work environment or needs of team
Situational Leadership Theory
People behind Situational Leadership Theory
Hersey
Blanchard
Johnson
Requires close supervision and constant guidance
Repetitive results are neede
Novice Level
Unable, unwilling and insecure
Telling Style (High Task to Low Relationship)
Unmotivated to perform a task
Unable but willing and confident
Selling (High Task to High Relationship)
Able but unwilling and insecure
Paticipating (Low task to High relationship)
Team is efficient requires little guide
Able, willing and confident
Delegating (Low task to low relationship)
Provide specific instructions and close supervision
Unable, unwilling and insecure
Telling (High task to Low relationship)
Explain your decisions and provide clarification
Unable but willing and confident
Selling (High task to High relationship)
Share ideas and facilitate in making decisions
Able but unwilling and insecure
Participating (Low task to High relationship)
Turn over responsibility
Able, willing and confident
Delegating (Low task to low relationship)
Separate decision making into expectancy, instrumentality, and valence
Vromm-Yetton Expectancy Model
How much they believe that their additional effort will help them
“Efforts will leaf to high performance”
Expectancy
How much they believe that rewards will actually appear
“Performance will lead to predicted outcome”
Instrumentality
How much they value the potential rewards
“Predicted outcomes are desirable”
Valence
Influence their subordinates
SATISFACTION
MOTIVATION
PERFORMANCE
House-Mitchell Path-Goal Theory
Provide clear instructions
Promotes transparency
For marginally and partially employees
Directive leadership
Focuses on supportive and friendly work environment
Routine and very experienced employee
Supportive Leadership
Involves consultation and request for opinions
For moderate and somewhat ambiguous
Participative leadership
Includes setting challenging goals
For skilled and higky innovative and ambiguous
Achievement-oriented leadership
Increasing calue on collaboration and teamwork
Must use additonal skills especially group and political leadership
Contemporary Leadership
Should be updated
Update himself
Identify olf and learn new
Quantum Leadership