Precedent Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define ratio decidendi

A

Binding part of written judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a case to show ratio decidendi?

A

R v Howe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the binding part of R v Howe

A

Duress is not a defense to murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define obiter dicta

A

‘Other things said’ May be persuasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case was persuaded by obiter dicta

A

R v Gotts was persuaded by R v Howe’s duress is not a defense to attempted murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are four features of law reporting?

A
  • Formal systematic law reporting has been carried out since 1865 but there are any reports that predate this
  • The reports contain the area of law, date, court, parties, judges and advocates as well as the facts and judgement
  • They are either written by the judge themselves or an independent lawyer who is checked by the judge
  • They can be found on specialist journals, websites and certain broadsheet newspapers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the functions of court hierarchy?

A

1) Allow refinement of law by increasingly more capable judges throughout appeal process
2) Informs us about status and authority of particular decision
3) Allocates cases to courts with specialist knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the order of courts in the court hierarchy?

A

For criminal cases:
The most inferior is the Magistrates court, then it is the Crown court, High Court, Court of Appeal then Supreme Court

For civil cases:
The most inferior is a County court, ordinary high court, then the high courts with two split divisions (Chancery and Family), Court of Appeal nd then the Supreme Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define overruling

A

Any higher court can overrule a lower court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the cases that demonstrate overruling?

A

Pepper v Hart 1993 overruled Davis v Johnson 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Practice Statement of 1966?

A

Gave the supreme court the power to overrule its own decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a case that demonstrates the Practice statement 1966

A

R v G overruled MPC v Caldwell
or
Arthur J.S Hall v Simons overruled Rondel v Worsley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is thhe Young v Bristol Aeroplane?

A

It allows the Court of Appeal to overrule its own decisions if either:
1- There is a later Supreme Court decision that says something different
2- Two earlier COA decisions conflict
3- The earlier COA decision overlooked some piece of legislation in error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is distinguishing?

A

Any judge can distinguish a case by showing that the facts are significantly different to a case they are supposed to be bound by.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What case gives an example of distinguishing?

A

Merritt v Merritt distinguishes Balfour v Balfour
Wisher v Essex - SUPREME COURT ALONE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some advantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Certainty and predictability
  • Less room for judicial error (Graham, Byrne)
  • Treating similar cases the same way
  • Judges remain impartial (Automatic telephone and Electric Co. Ltd v Registrar of restrictive trading arrangements
  • Based on reality not hypothetical situations
17
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
18
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
18
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
18
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
19
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
19
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
20
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
20
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.
21
Q

What are some disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A
  • Stare decisis limits creative development of law - it can be mechanical and thoughtless
  • Mistakes are perpetuated R v R
  • Can be confusing with so many precedents
  • It may be hard to find the precedent (Dodds Case COA couldn’t find HOL RD)
  • Little flexibility
    Law develops by chance (Ivey v Genting Casinos
  • Can be retrospective (SW v UK)
  • Undemocratic
  • Overruling may be unfair for others.