Pre Action Protocols Flashcards
What are the aims of the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct? (PD 1.1)
- Enable parties to settle the issue between them without the need to start proceedings (that is, a court claim); and
- Support the efficient management by the court and the parties of proceedings that cannot be avoided.
What are the primary ways that the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct seeks to achieve it’s aims? (PD 1.2)
By encouraging the parties to –
- Exchange information about the issue, and
- Consider using a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (‘ADR’)
What are some factors the Court may take into account when assessing compliance under PD 4?
- Whether the parties have “complied in substance with the relevant principles and requirements”
- The proportionality of the steps taken compared to the size and importance of the matter;
- Considering the urgency of the matter. Where a matter is urgent (for example, an application for an injunction) the court will expect the parties to comply only to the extent that it is reasonable to do so.
What are four examples of non compliance listed in the Pre Action Conduct Practice Direction 4.4?
- Not providing sufficient information to enable the other party to understand the issues;
- Not acting within a time limit set out in a relevant pre-action protocol, or, where no specific time limit applies, within a reasonable period;
- Unreasonably refusing to consider ADR
- Without good reason, not disclosed documents requested to be disclosed.
True or false:
PD 4.5 The court will look at the overall effect of non-compliance on the other party when deciding whether to impose sanctions.
True
True or false:
The court will not stay proceedings but will instead make an order for costs.
(PD 4.6(1)
False- the Court may both stay proceedings and make an order for costs on an indemnity basis.
According to the Practice Direction on Pre Action Conduct what should a claimant do to start proceedings?
(PD 7.1(1))
The claimant should set out the details of the matter in writing by sending a letter before claim to the defendant.
According to the Practice Direction on Pre Action Conduct what should a defendant do when they receive a letter before action?
(PD 7.1(2))
The defendant should give a full written response within a reasonable period, preceded, if appropriate, by a written acknowledgment of the letter before claim.
Where the matter is straightforward, for example an undisputed debt, then a full response should normally be provided within 30 days. True or false?
(PD 7.2(2))
False- where the matter is straightforward, for example an undisputed debt, then a full response should normally be provided within 14 days;
Where the matter is particularly complex, for example requiring specialist advice, then a period of longer than 30 days will always be appropriate. True or false?
(PD 7.2(3)
False. Where the matter is particularly complex, for example requiring specialist advice, then a period of longer than 30 days may be appropriate;
A period of longer than 90 days in which to provide a full response will only be considered reasonable in exceptional circumstances. True or false?
(PD 7.2(5))
True
The obligation to consider settlement only applies before a claim has formally been launched. True or false?
(PD 8.4)
False
The parties should continue to consider the possibility of reaching a settlement at all times. This still applies after proceedings have been started, up to and during any trial or final hearing.
Where no pre action protocol exists- what details should be included in a letter before claim according to the Practice Direction on Pre Action Conduct? (PD Annex A)
- The claimant’s full name and address;
- The basis on which the claim is made (i.e. why the claimant says the defendant is liable);
- A clear summary of the facts on which the claim is based;
- What the claimant wants from the defendant; and
- If financial loss is claimed, an explanation of how the amount has been calculated.
Starting proceedings should usually be a step of last resort, and proceedings should not normally be started when a settlement is still actively being explored. However, the Court will not investigate prior conduct by the parties before a claim has commenced.
True or false?
(PD 4.4(3))
False
The court may require evidence that the parties considered some form of ADR.
Commencing a claim should be a “last resort” according to PD 8.1. True or false?
True
Failing to send a pre action letter at all is unreasonable conduct and may attract a sanction; though only in extreme circumstances according to Phoenix Finance v Federation International. True or false?
False. Failing to send a pre action letter will “invariably” attract a sanction according to the White Book.
The protocols are “codes of best practice”; they do not need to be followed slavishly, but any divergence must be reasonable. True or false?
True