Pre-Action and starting a claim Flashcards
Judges and address?
Justice’s of supreme court, judges of CA - My Lord or My lady
High court judges, masters - my lord or my lady
County court - circuit judges, recorders, - Your honour
Deputy district judge and district judge - Judge
Overriding objective?
Overriding objective
- Deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost
Case analysis?
A case analysis is an investigation of legal issues to determine what must be proved or disproved
- Help inform clients decisions to bring a claim on merits of case
- Inform strategy of pursing case
- Assist to estimate the budget costs
Duty
- Did the D owe a duty to the claimant
- Is there a contract with express or implied terms
- Is there a tortious duty
Breach
- Is there a breach of contract or tortious duty to both
- Question of fact on evidence
Causation
- Did it cause the harm
Loss
- Remedy sought – was it enforceable
Parties
- Who should bring the claim
- Are there any actual or potential defendants who the defendant might seek a contribution or indemnify from
Limitation
- Any issues with limitation
- Burden of proving an issue generally falls on party who asserts it
- Balance of probabilities – if more than likely to have happened it will be proved
Aims of pre-action protocols?
Aims of pre-action protocols
- Force parties to have a more cards on the table approach to resolving the dispute.
- Without involving the courts
- One expectations of pre-action are that they consider whether negotiation or another form of ADR might allow them to avoid proceedings. Silence in response to an opponent’s suggestion of ADR can be deemed as unreasonable conduct.
Consequences of non- compliance?
Consequences of noncompliance –
- Court will decide if it merits adverse consequences
- Most likely relate to costs and interest
- Court may also stay proceedings until relevant steps are taken
Is non-compliance ever justified?
- Where a limitation period is about to expire – may be necessary to issue proceedings before there is time to comply with pre-action. Ordinarily will need to apply for a stay in proceedings after issue in order that ore-action can be followed
- Whether there is another reason – like element of surprises.
Practice direction applies to?
All cases, but where a specific protocol applies the provision will override any conflict with the practice direction.
Practice direction
- Claimant should write to potential defendant to give details of the claim – LETTER OF CLAIM
- Within a reasonable time – defendant should send a response letter – this must either ACCET OR REJECT CLAIM GIVING REASONS
- Parties should disclose key documents and engage in appropriate negotiations and make proposals for settlement
Pre-action protocol for personal injury claims applies to?
Personal injury claims
Which do not fall within another pre-action protocol
and which are likely to be allocated to the fast track
Example of pre-action protocol for personal injury claims
- Claimant should write a letter of notification to potential defendant giving brief details to enable defendant to notify insurer
- Parties consider any rehabilitation needs and how to address them
- Claimant should write to defendant to give full details on the claim
- Defendant to acknowledged letter of claim within 21 days
- Defendant to investigate and send full letter of response within 3 months of letter acknowledging claims – if defendant denies liability or sums
Limitations
- If proceedings not commenced within relevant limitation period – claimant will be barred from recovering damages – as such defendant will have a full defence
Personal injury limitaion?
Personal injury
- Claimant must make a claim within 3 years of the latest of
- Date of action accrues or
- Date of knowledge of person injured
Fatal accidents
- If someone dies, people who were depending on that employee can claim compensation from employer.
- Claim cannot be brought if person injured could no longer bring a claim
- Claim cannot be brought after 3 years of
o Date of death
o Date of knowledge of dependents
Date of knowledge
Knowing that:
- Injury was significance
- Was attributable to alleged wrongdoing
- Identify of defendant
- If it’s alleged that the wrongdoing was by someone other than defendant – that the identity of that person and additional facts supporting bring the claim against the defendant.
Extensions of time
- Court can extend time in relation to personal injury claims or fatal accidents act if it would be equitable to do so
- Court will look at conduct of parties
- Reasons for delay
- Effect of such late claim on evidence
Limitation for contribution?
- If two sources are liable – if claimant claims against a retailer, they may be entitled to claim a contribution towards that liability from manufacturer
- Limitation date is 2 years from the date on which the right to recover the contribution arose
- The date when judgement was given imposing liability on first party
- If the parties agreed to make payment – the date on which the amount to be paid was first agreed
Latent damage limitation?
damage
- NOT APPLY TO PERSONAL INJURY – AND THE ABOVE TAKES PRECEDNECE
- Sometimes an act of negligence causes damage that claimant may not be aware of for a long time
- In negligence claims – NOT PERSONAL INJURY
In negligence claims other than personal injury
6 years form when cause of action accrued
3 years from when he had the requisite knowledge and right to bring a claim
In negligence claims that ARE NOT PERSONAL INJURY?
In negligence claims (other than claims for personal injury), the limitation period is extended to the
later of:
(a) Six years from when the cause of action accrued; or
(b) Three years from when he had the requisite:
(i) knowledge; and
(ii) right to bring a claim. (s14A)
But this is subject to a long-stop limitation date of 15 years from the date of the latest negligent
act / omission which caused all or part of the damage (s14B).
Action to enforce a judgement and tort and contract claims?
An action to enforce a judgement
- Cannot be brought after 6 years from when judgement became enforceable
Tort and contracts claim
- An action in tort – limitation period expires after 6 years after the date on which the cause of action accrued
- Likewise for contract
Fraud?
- Doesn’t begin until claimant discovered the fraud
ADR types?
Negotiation
- Communication between parties, intended to reach a compromise or agreement
Mediation
- Confidential process, intended to facilitate the resolution of dispute through a medium of an impartial third party. Generally, each party will be present in same location but in different rooms. Mediator will move between rooms. Encourage each party to reach a decision.
Arbitration
- Resolved by an impartial adjudicator whose decision the parties of dispute have agreed will be final and binding
- The question of whether to arbitrate or not occurs at two key stages
- When negotiating a contract, the parties may decide to include an arbitration clause in their agreement
- When a dispute has arisen, the parties can choose to deal with it by way or arbitration
- Can be JUST AS COSTLY AS LITIGATION – DOESN’T PRSERVE RELATIONSHIP
- BUT IT IS PRIVATE
- CAN AGREE FLEXIBILE OUTCOMES
Med-arb
- Process by which initially agree to try and solve through mediation and if not satisfactory move to arbitration
Early neutral evaluation/expert appraisal/expert evaluation
- Where an independent party is appointing by the parties.
- Will provide a non-binding assessment of the matter referred to it
- Parties will have to pay them for their time and costs
Expert determination
- Satisfactory where a technical knowledge is required
- Binding determination
Conciliation
- Involves an independent neutral third party in helping parties to resolve their dispute.
Court expects parties to explore ADR
- Preserves or creates a better relationship between the parties
- Can aid in preserving relationships
Less expensive
Greater privacy
Less disruption to clients
Outcomes that reflect risk
Greater control over process
Greater involvement of parties themselves