practice questions concepts Flashcards
Balancing the suggestiveness of the lineup procedure against the witness’s lack of certainty before the lineup, a court would likely _________ testimony regarding the lineup. (assuming that the witness lacked certainty).
exclude
T or F In order for a defendant to assert the necessity defense , he must not be at fault in bringing about the emergency situation that forces him to choose between the lesser of two harms.
True
T or F Miranda protects defendants against government coercion but goes no further than that.”
True
T or F the Supreme Court has held that a statement obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment cannot be used for impeachment purposes at trial where the statement contradicts the defendant’s trial testimony.
false, it can be used for impeachment where the statement contradicts defendant’s trial testimony
Probable cause cannot be used in support of a warrant if the probable cause was
illegally obtained.
Describe the analysis for a Batson challenge.
(1) The party making the challenge must establish a prima facie case of discrimination;
(2) The party defending the strike must then state a race or gender neutral reason for making the strike; and
(3) The court must then determine whether the reasons stated are, in fact, race and gender neutral.
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits criminal defendants from exercising peremptory strikes in a manner that discriminates on the basis of?
race, gender, or other suspect characteristic.
It is not necessary to show that the overruling or sustaining of a Batson challenge allowed specific jurors to sit on the jury and that they affected the verdict before a conviction could be overturned. It is sufficient to show ?
It is sufficient to show that the jury’s equal protection rights and the defendant’s due process rights were violated by denying him his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.
The right to a jury attaches in any criminal proceeding where the defendant faces a potential sentence of longer than ?
6 months.
T or F If imprisonment is imposed, a defendant has a right to counsel.
Specifically, “Absent waiver, a defendant may not be imprisoned for any offense…unless
True
he was represented by counsel” [Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)]
T or F Generally, in order to properly execute a valid warrant where the officers will be entering a home, officers must knock and announce their presence before going into the house. However, if the officers have a reasonable belief that knocking will be futile, they are not required to take such action.
True
T or F A party who, with the requisite intent, aids, abets, or encourages the commission of a crime while at or near the scene of the crime is a principal in the second degree.
True
judgment for motion for judgment of acquittal can only be granted only if:
Acquittal only if insufficient evidence to prove defendant committed each element of crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used at a criminal proceeding. To challenge a search under the Fourth Amendment, one must have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the thing searched.
Explain the standing requirement in challenging evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment.
Only a victim of the search has standing to challenge a search under the 4th Amendment.
Even if someone else’s rights were violated, one cannot challenge the admission of evidence on those grounds.
A court looks for one’s legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place.
To prove robbery, the taking must be accomplished by
To prove robbery, the taking must be accomplished by force, intimidation, or threat of violence. The threat must put the victim in actual fear at the time of the taking.