PR From Essay PQs Flashcards
Duty of Competence
Under MR, a lawyer is obligated to provide competent representation to a client and must possess the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Under CRPC, a lawyer must not intentionally, recklessly, with gross negligence, or repeatedly fail to perform legal services with competence, which requires the
(i) learning and skill, and
(ii) mental, emotional, and physical ability reasonably necessary for the representation.
Duty to Avoid Frivolous Claims
MR: Lawyers are prohibited from bringing or defending a proceeding, or asserting or opposing an issue in a proceeding, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous. An action will be considered frivolous under the MR if the lawyer is unable either to
(i) make a good-faith argument on the merits of the action taken or
(ii) to support the action taken by a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.
CA: a lawyer must not present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.
Conflict of Interest
A COI arises when there is significant risk that the representation of a client may be materially limited by the lawyer’s own personal interests.
For both MR and CRPC, a lawyer may still undertake representation threatened by a conflict of interest if
(i) the lawyer reasonably believes that he will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to the affected client;
(ii) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(iii) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal, and
(iv) the affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing (MR) or informed written consent (CA RPC).
Duty Not to Commingle Client Property
MR: A lawyer must hold the client’s property in their possession in connection with the representation separate from the lawyer’s own property.
Duty to Communicate
MR: A lawyer has a duty to keep the client reasonably informed of the status of their case
CRPC: A lawyer has a duty to keep the client reasonably informed about significant developments related to the representation
Duty of Fairness - Access to Evidence
MR/CRPC: A lawyer must not unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter/destroy/conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value
Permissive Withdrawal
MR: a lawyer may seek to withdraw if he can do so without materially harming the client. Even when harm to the client may result, a lawyer may seek to withdraw under a variety of grounds, such as when the client persists in a course of action that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent or the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement with, or when the client has made representation unreasonably difficult for the lawyer.
CRPC: a lawyer may not request to withdraw merely because the withdrawal would not materially harm the client, but may request to withdraw if the client insists on presenting a claim or defense not warranted under existing law and which cannot be supported by a good-faith argument, when the client has made representation unreasonably difficult for the lawyer, or when continuing the representation is likely to result in a violation of the CA RPC or the State Bar Act, among other reasons.
Procedure for Withdrawal
The proper procedure for terminating representation is to first provide the client with reasonable notice before withdrawing in order to give the client a reasonable opportunity to obtain new representation. Further, if permission for termination of a representation is required by the rules of a tribunal, a lawyer must not terminate a representation before that tribunal without its permission. Upon termination of the representation, the lawyer must return all papers and property to which the client is entitled.
Employing a Disbarred Attorney
CRPC: a lawyer must not employ, associate in practice with, or assist a person the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is a disbarred attorney to:
(i) render legal advice to a client,
(ii) make appearances on behalf of a client,
(iii) appear as a representative of the client at a deposition or other discovery matter, or
(iv) engage in activities that constitute the practice of law.
Does not extend to research/drafting/clerical activities
Assisting In the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Under both MR/CRPC: a lawyer must not knowingly assist a person who is not admitted to the bar in the unauthorized practice of law. The non-lawyer who engages in the unauthorized practice of law will be subject to civil and criminal penalties, but will not be subject to discipline under the ethics rules. A lawyer who engages in the unauthorized practice of law or assists a non-lawyer in unauthorized practice may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and is subject to discipline under the ethics rules.
Supervision of Non-Lawyers
Under MR/CRPC: a lawyer with direct supervisory authority over another lawyer or non-lawyer must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the supervised person’s conduct conforms to the ethics rules.
Threatening a Claim to Gain Advantage
CRPC: CA lawyers are specifically prohibited from, and subject to discipline for, threatening to bring “criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges in an effort to obtain an advantage n a civil dispute.
Communication with a Represented Organization
MR: a lawyer is prohibited from communicating with a constituent of the organization who has authority to obligate the organization with respect to the matter, or whose act or omission in connection with the matter may be imputed to the organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability.
CRPC: A lawyer is prohibited from communicating with
(i) a current officer, director, partner, or managing agent of the organization or
(ii) current employee, member, agent or other constituent of the organization if the subject of the communication is any act or omission of such person in connection with the matter which may be binding upon or imputed to the organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability.
Duty of Loyalty - General
Lawyers owe clients a basic duty of loyalty and independent professional judgment. When a lawyer’s independent professional judgment is potentially compromised by a nonclient interest (i.e., a conflict of interest exists), the lawyer may be in breach of the duty of loyalty.
Duty of Loyalty - Current Clients
MR: a lawyer must not represent a client if doing so would be directly adverse to the interests of another current client or if there is a significant risk that the representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to the current client, unless:
(i) the lawyer reasonably believes that she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(ii) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(iii) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(iv) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.