PQ - BOC and Damages Flashcards
What are the 2 types of losses?
i) pecuniary loss
ii) non-pecuniary loss
How is cost of cure examined for pecuniary losses?
D may claim damages for the cost of curing the defect/completing the work
- cost of cure can only be recoverable is reasonable [Ruxley v Forsyth] - pool case
for reasonableness, consider
1) Purpose of contracting
2) Intention to cure
3) Proportionality of cure
Exception: Radford - if C actually effects the cure, she can claim the cost of cure.
When can distress/ disappointment be compensated?
- Can only be compensated where the loss is
1) Consequent upon physical inconvenience or injury [Farley v Skinner] - House near airport
2) Purpose of the contract is non-pecuniary: Affording the claimant with pleasure must be an important object of the contract [Jarvis v Swan Tours]
What are the limitations to recoverable pecuniary damages?
1) the mitigation rule
2) Remoteness
What is the mitigation rule?
D must prove that C failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate his losses
1) Kaines - when C does not receive goods or services contracted for, D must make reasonable efforts to buy substitute performance
2) Yetton v Eastwoods - when C is wrongly dismissed by his employer, D must make reasonable efforts to obtain alternative employment
3) Selvanayagam - when C sustains physical injury from breach, he must make reasonable efforts to reduce the injury ie undergo an operation unless the operation entails risk of complications.
What are the limits on the recovery for non-pecuniary loss?
1) Non-pecuniary purpose must be [Farley v Skinner]
a) important to the claimant
b) made a specific term of the contract
c) clearly communicated to the defendant
2) Commercial Claimants excluded, Lord Cooke in Johnson v Gore wood says players “expected to meet” commercial life with “mental fortitude”
3) The loss should be caused by the breach - D must know the importance of the C’s non-pecuniary purpose and foresee loss from breach [Farley v Skinner]
What is the test for remoteness?
1) External Test [Hadley v Baxendale]
Was the loss foreseeable?
2) Internal Test [The Achilleas]
Did D assume responsibility for the loss?
How do you apply the Hadley v Baxendale test?
1) Was the loss foreseeable at the time of contract formation?
2) Only the type of loss needs to be foreseeable, not the extent [Victoria Laundry]
Differentiated between ordinary profit and special profit, C could recover for ordinary profit but not special profit (Contract from the Ministry of Supply)
How do you apply The Achilleas test?
1) ask if the D has objectively assumed responsibility for the loss
e. g. In the facts, D could have assumed responsibility for the delay in returning the vessel but not the price of the charter of the boat.
What losses are covered in Hadley v Baxendale test?
1) Normal losses: Losses that arise naturally out of the contract
2) Abnormal losses: Loss arising from knowledge of special circumstances outside the ordinary course of things
- these special circumstances need to be communicated to the defendant