PPS REVISION Flashcards

1
Q

What is a social construct

A

the understanding that everyday knowledge is creativity produced by individual and is directed towards practical problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ethnicity is based on two main things ethnic group and ethnic origin what is the difference

A

a. ) Ethnic group- based on an individual conception of social group membership and personal identify
b. ) Ethnic origin- an allocated definition based on common ancestry or place of origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 guidelines that must in order to include race as a factor in research.

A
  1. to define ‘race and ethnicity’ in the context of the requirement of the research study.
  2. to explain how these categories relate to the research hypothesis
  3. To describe how participants are assigned to research categories
  4. To describe the limitations of the study with respect to the populations to which research findings can be generalised (reason why scientists may ignore social construct in their research)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is meant by the professional duty of candour?

A

Every healthcare professional must be open and honest with patients when something that goes wrong with their treatment or care causes, or has the potential to cause, harm or distress. apologise to the patient (or, where appropriate, the patient’s advocate, carer or family)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is needed in order to prove negligence in a civil suit.

A

In order to prove negligence in a civil suit the plaintiff must prove three things (on the balance of probabilities):
1. The doctor had a duty of care (easy to establish)

  1. The duty of care was breached (harder to establish)
    - a doctor is not guilty of negligence “if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art”
    - a doctor is not guilty of negligence if his actions have a “logical basis”
  2. The breach of the duty of care caused harm (hard to establish)

• Injuries/deaths often caused by number of factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A night watchman attended A+E with abdominal pain. The doctor on-call refused to see the patient and told the nurse to discharge him. The patient died soon afterwards. It is later discovered that the night watchman had accidentally been poisoned with arsenic. The patient’s wife sued the doctor. Did she win her case?

A

• Did the doctor have a duty of care? YES!
• Did the doctor breach his duty? YES!
• Did the doctor cause patient’s death? NO
• the patient would have died in any case
So, did the patient’s wife win her case? NO as failure to prove causation!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A young man presents to his GP with a lump in his left testicle. The GP diagnoses a benign lump. 12 months later the patient presents again to his GP and this time a malignancy is diagnosed. The patient is informed that his chances of survival have now been reduced from ~40% to ~20% due to the late diagnosis.

Is there negligence in a case like this?

A

In similar case the claimant closed his case as even if he was diagnosed things probably wouldn’t have changed. Have to be able to prove that had the defendant not acted negligently they would have been more likely that not to not have suffered the loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the limitation period when it comes to making claims about medical negligence.

A
  • limitation period: actions for negligence should be brought within three years of claimant discovering damage
  • courts have the discretion to extend limitation period
  • In case of neonates, period does not start until patient reaches maturity (18)- actions can be brought until child is 21
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If you sign a prescription on the advice of another and it goes wrong who is responsible

A

If you sign a prescription (even on the advice of another) YOU are legally responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is lack of expertise and lack of experience taken into consideration in legal settings

A

lack of expertise IS taken into account when determining negligence however doctors do have a duty to refer.

lack of experience is NOT taken into account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

litigation can lead to defensive medicine. what is litigation and what is defensive medicine?

A

Litigation- the process of taking legal action-

Defensive medicine “the practice of performing tests as a safeguard against possible malpractice liability rather than to ensure the health of patients” - waste of resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can existing phycological theories of health behaviour adequately explain harmful health behaviours?

Or

What can psychological theories tell us about why individuals engage in harmful and risky health behaviours?

A
  1. The health belief model

based on how much of treat you think something is, the benefits you will get and whether you think you can change or not will depend on whether there is changed behaviour.
A-identifies important barriers to change
D- treat does not predict behaviour change- smoking, drinking, drugs. Leaves out emotion, habit, social norms…

  1. The theory of planned behaviour

Intention is said to be a result of a process that takes account of:
-attitudes
-Subjective norms
-Perceived behaviour control
and based on your intention you will choose to change your behaviour.
A-intentions predict some behaviour/ highlights social norms
D– Most of the time intentions do not predict behaviour. Past behaviour is often the best predictor of behaviour. Environmental influences. Habits.

  1. Transtheoretical Model

Stages:
• Pre-contemplation – no change contemplated
• Contemplation – desire to change within 6 months
• Preparation – intend to change in near future
• Action – behaviour is changed
• Maintenance
• Relapse

A- - Broad and has identified many useful processes involved in behaviour change
D- this process does not happen in all changed behaviours. Does not factor in spontaneous change.

  1. Cognitive dissonance theory
    This is a theory that when two beliefs/ thoughts. contradict themselves this causes as negative feeling and so people will attempt to solve this. This is done by either changing your first or second belief/ thought.
    e..g. smoking can kill and cause diseases, I smoke.
  2. The COM-B mode (newest)
    capability, motivation and opportunity needed for changed behaviour. (remember it as what is needed to prove someone is guilty.

problems with them all:
Most theories implicitly assume a high degree of rationality in human behaviour

new models will need to include concepts of:
identity, impulse, momentary priorities, accidents, spontaneous/chaotic change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the difference between physical activity and exercise?

A

Physical activity: Any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure e.g. vacuuming, bringing in shopping

Exercise: activity requiring physical effort, carried out to sustain or improve health and fitness e.g running or football

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the adult and child recommendation for exercise?

A

Adults should engage in at least __150____mins of moderate intensity activity every week
Or alternatively they should do __75____minutes of vigorous activity across the week.
What about children? How much physical activity should they do? _____60 _____Minutes per day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name 2 unmodifiable predictors of physical inactivity.

A
  1. Being male – stronger sports culture
  2. Being younger – as responsibilities reduce PA
  3. Genetics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

H. Name 2 modifiable predictors of physical inactivity.

A
  1. Higher socio-economic status- safer environment

2. barriers to PA – lack of time, don’t enjoy exercise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

I. Which theory of health behaviour includes intention and motivation?

A

Theory of planned behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe examples of physical activity interventions

A

London bus study –
Traced the hearth attack rates of bus drivers and conductors
- The bus drivers sat for most of their shift.
- The conductors climbed about 600 steps each day
- Conductors had half of heart attacks over the bus drivers

Susan mayor 2018- Study finds physical activity reduces the risk of depression at any age
Ratey 2008 – PA improves cognitive ability. In a high school with early morning exercise program there was improved literacy, algebra and reading sores.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

• Discuss common health behaviour theories which focus on changing behaviour to increase physical activity,

A
  1. theory of planned behaviour
    3 things determine this intention:
  • Attitude: the feeling someone had towards something
  • subjective norm: The normal attitude (around us toward the behaviour
  • perceived behavioural control: how much control we think we have over whether we can or want to undergo the activity
    But intention doesn’t always lead to activity.
  1. Habit formation
  • Context dependent repetition leads to behaviour change.
  • But how long does it take to forma habit- average 66 days but range is from 18-356 days.
  1. COM-B model- motivation, opportunity, capability
  2. The role of genetics
20
Q

• Critically analyse different ethical principles that support resource allocation decisions.

You have one liver who do you give it to and why (apply these ideas)

Bob, 2, Baby
Congenital liver disease.
Prognosis with new liver – fairly good

Christos, 19, student
Cirrhosis secondary to congenital biliary atresia.
Prognosis with new liver - fairly poor.

Douglas, 75 , company chairman
Company provides 200 local jobs. Viral hepatitis contracted during voluntary work in Africa. Prognosis with new liver – good

Barbara, 30 , single mother
Chronic liver failure since mid 20’s. Paracetamol self-poisoning, alcohol abuse. Prognosis with new liver - very good

A

The veil of ignorance

  • This a device to facilitate thought about what a ‘just’ system would look like
  • Argues that we should think of ourselves behind the ‘veil of ignorance’ where we know nothing about our status, ability, ethnicity, wealth etc.
  • Then we would create the fairest society just in case we end up being the weakest, poorest, least intelligent etc.
  1. Free market
    - Where everyone has ownership of their own money and instead of getting the government involved you spend your money when you want and where you want. The government should only be involved in making sure trades are fair and people stick to their word.
    - Disadvantages: Firstly, those who are particularly disadvantaged will have a big problem in accessing resources. Secondly, even though the government would make sure exchanges are looked over however it is a matter of luck how you would end up as a result of them. Also, some people are just more skilled than others and it will end up disadvantaged.
  2. Lottery
    - Everyone has an equal opportunity
    - But does not take into consideration prognosis or outcome or age or if the problem is self- inflicted etc.
  3. Need (allocation on the basis need)
    - Strongly used in the NHS but then you need to define need appropriately ( is low self- worth a need for surgery etc.)
    - How do you compare need? How does my need for preventative health care measures compare to someone else’s need for stage 3 cancer treatment.
  4. Consequentialism
    - The outcome outweighs the means and looks at the consequence of the allocation
    - For example, if I give this person this treatment how much improvement in quality of life over how many years this going to be gained for. (QALY search it.)
    - However, ageist.
  5. Personal responsibility
    - you made the mess; you clean it up
    - Self-inflicting diseases e.g. from smoking
    - The NHS does not work by this
  6. Social worth – who is ‘worth’ more?
    - Who has a larger contribution to society for example a mother of 4 who is a doctor may be ‘worth more’ than a man on benefits.
    - Can lead to discrimination.
    - Or for example someone who is a key worker should have more of a right to PPE.
  7. The democratic way (democracy)
    - Idea is that how resources are allocated should be decided on the basis of democracy so what the majority of the people want.
  8. Pluralism
    - Considering all of the different values and try and bring them together to make a decision (all above)
    - But how much weighting do you give to each method also some may argue that these different methods cannot be compared as they are completely different. E.g. you would compare apples and pears.
21
Q

(a) In outline, describe the differences in health outcomes that currently exist between social classes in the U.K

A

Educational attainment: Strongly linked with health behaviours and outcomes. Low attainment may impact on many outcomes in later life including, quality of work, future earnings, involvement in crime, and high rates of morbidity.

Employment: One of the most important determinants of physical and mental health; The effect of unemployment does not just affect individuals. Children growing up in workless households are almost twice as likely to fail at all stages of education compared with children growing up in working families.

Living standards/income: There is a strong association between income and health, with many health outcomes improving incrementally as income rises.
— A parent’s income may influence a child’s early development and educational opportunities, which in turn can affect a child’s employment opportunities and their income.

— Relative health risk is primarily associated with an individual’s socioeconomic class position. (E.G if you come from a lower class more likely to smoke, live in a part of London with high levels of pollution, get a poor education or be involved in crime)

poor nutrition

22
Q

(b) Identify and briefly describe two social explanations that account for the contemporary trend in health inequalities.

A

Low attainment in school may impact on many outcomes in later life including, quality of work, future earnings, involvement in crime, and high rates of morbidity.

A parent’s income may influence a child’s early development and educational opportunities, which in turn can affect a child’s employment opportunities and their income.

If you have more money and higher class more likely to be able to afford to live in a place with low levels of pollution.

23
Q

what is the difference between health inequality and health inequity.

A

Health inequality: This refers to differential health outcomes (e.g. mortality and morbidity rates) as a result of social and economic inequalities. for example poorer people more likely to have COPD

Health inequity; This is an unequal distribution of resources between different population groups which results in different levels of access to health services.
One example would be access to health services based on income in predominantly market-based health care systems i.e the USA. so very much about distribution of resources.

24
Q

how has life expectancy changed over the years?

A

For men and women of all social classes, life expectancy has increased, but the gap in life years between classes has not narrowed in fact they have widened.
— Social inequalities have widened as a consequence of greater gains in life expectancy in the least deprived populations

25
Q

what is difference between relative and absolute measures of life expectancy

A

An absolute measure is one that uses numerical variations to determine the degree of error. … Relative measures are the major alternative to absolute measures. They use statistical variations based on percentages to determine how far from reality a figure is within context.

Absolute & relative dispersion are two different ways to measure the spread of a data set. … Absolute measures always have units, while relative measures do not.

26
Q

what is the difference between sensation and perception?

A

Perception: recognition, integration and interpretation of raw sensory information/ stimuli

Sensation: process of detecting the presence of stimuli by sensory organs

27
Q

how can ideas of perception be applied to clinical practise?

A
  • Attention: In the absence of attention, it is likely that patients will not perceive given information accurately. Pain is perceived as higher when less distracted.
  • Emotional/ psychopathology: depressed patients can perceive information as more negative or can dismiss positive outcomes as being unlikely.
  • Expectations: expectations about symptoms can lead to patients ignoring potentially serios illness (e.g., angina or diabetic symptoms are seen as familiar and therefore not serious)
  • Motivation: As patients often have very particular needs (especially when related to worries/ fears) they may be prone to interpreting information as relating to their needs e.g., search for wonder drug
  • Age: with a reduced ability to ignore irrelevant information (an effect which begins in middle age), compliance to mediation instructions for example may become more difficult.

think: attention? motivation? emotion?

28
Q

what is the difference between top down and bottom up perception

A

bottom up (not the case)- what you see is what you get your mind doesn’t add any extra to your perception. e.g. when you see someone far away they are small even our knowledge of what size they actually are isn’t enough to change our perception of them. - Problem with that is retina is a 2D surface yet we perceive the world in 3D also we actually see things in the retina upside down so the brain must have an alteration as the retina flips the image.

top down- - Theory suggests that processing involves the combination of sensorial data with other psychological constructs such as expectancies, previous experiences or other sensorial information to provide a context., your final perception depends on who you are, whom you’re with, and what you expect, want and value and your previous experience.

29
Q

• Outline the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and multi-disciplinary approaches to its management

A

In order to understand a person’s perception of pain biological (genetics, physiology) change, psychological status (perceived control, depression) and sociocultural (social learning, socioeconomic support) context all need to be considered.

Management of pain will target all three of these factors.

Psychological: CBT (improve quality of life and management of pain through, education, coping strategies, stress management and increasing perceived control and self-efficacy), counselling, ACT (observing and being aware of thoughts, feelings, physical sensations in the moment and changing individual’s relationship
to pain and other psychological
experiences) , mindfulness (MBSR)

Biological pain management: medications for pain/sleep/ depression/anxiety etc…

30
Q

What is palliative care?

A

Medical care that concentrates on reducing the severity of symptoms rather than trying to provide a cure or halt the progression of the disease

31
Q

what is the difference between suicide, assisted suicide and Euthanasia?

A

Suicide: Death caused by self- directed injuries behaviour with an intent to die as a result of the behaviour.

Assisted suicide: deliberately assisting or encouraging a person to kill themselves

Euthanasia: deliberately ending a person’s life for their benefit (e.g., to relieve pain)

  • Suicide is not unlawful in England.
  • Assisted suicide is unlawful in England.
  • Euthanasia is illegal in England.
32
Q

what is the difference between between active and passive euthanasia?

A
  • Active Euthanasia- where a person deliberately in to end a person’s life, for example by injecting them with sedatives.
  • Passive Euthanasia- where a person causes death by withholding or withdrawing treatment what is necessary to maintain life e.g., withholding antibiotics in someone with euthanasia.
33
Q

what is the difference between voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary eauthanasia?

A
  • Voluntary euthanasia: where a person makes a conscious decision to die and asks for help to do this.
  • Non- Voluntary euthanasia: where a person is unable to give their consent e.g., they are in a coma and another person makes the decision on their behalf. Often because the person previously expressed a wish for their life to be ended under these circumstances
  • Involuntary euthanasia: where a person is killed against their wishes
34
Q

• Explain and ethically evaluate the law relating to suicide and assisted suicide with particular reference to the guidance issued by the Director of Public Prosecution in relation to assisted suicide and the Doctrine of Double Effect

A
  1. Doctrine of double effect

This doctrine says that if doing something morally good has a morally bad side-effect it’s ethically OK to do it providing the bad side-effect wasn’t intended. This is true even if you foresaw that the bad effect would probably happen.
If the following obtains the act is permissible:
- the nature of the act is not bad
- at least one of the act’s consequences is good
- at least one of the act’s consequences is bad
- there is a sufficiently serious reason for allowing the bad consequence to occur
- the bad consequence is not a means to the good consequence
- the agent foresees the bad consequence but intends the good consequence

pros: argue that the principle captures the important notion that what matters from a moral point of view is our intentions.
cons: (primarily consequentialists) argue that the consequences are the same: death. The intentions do not matter.
2. The legality of DDE

The law allows the doctrine of double effect to apply in some cases:

“a doctor may…lawfully administer painkilling drugs despite the fact that he knows than an incidental effect of that application will be to abbreviate the patient’s life”

  1. DPP

the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) issued the prosecuting policy on cases of ‘Encouraging or Assisting Suicide’. It covers actions that happen in England and Wales, even if the suicide happens abroad.

  • Recent DPP Guidance on assisted suicide has NOT changed the law (i.e. assisted suicide is still illegal).
  • Nor does the guidance provide automatic immunity from prosecution. Rather, the guidance lists factors that weigh in favour of, and against, prosecution following an investigation…

Factors that will weigh in favour of prosecution:-

  • Under 18
  • Questions about capacity
  • No clear, settled and informed wish to die
  • Equivocal about dying
  • Process not initiated by person who dies
  • No terminal illness, severe and incurable physical disability or severe degenerative disease
  • Not motivated by compassion (or motivated by gain)
  • Evidence of persuasion, coercion, undue influence or pressure

Factors that will weigh against prosecution:-

  • A clear, settled and informed wish to die
  • Unequivocal and consistent about dying
  • Process was initiated by person who died
  • Person had terminal illness, severe and incurable physical disability or severe degenerative disease with no possibility of recovery
  • Evidence that suspect was motivated solely by compassion
  • Person offering assistance is spouse, partner, close relative or friend within context of long-standing and supportive relationship
  • Assistance provided was minor

Key points about the DPP guidance:

  • Assisted suicide, assisted dying and euthanasia remains illegal in the UK
  • All cases will be investigated and treated on an individual, case-by-case basis by the DPP
  • Those in a position of responsibility (e.g. doctors) should NOT assist in suicide
35
Q

what are some signs and symptoms of delayed/ prolonged grief?

A

prolonged:
} Preoccupation with longing and yearning for and searching
for the one who died which does not lessen with time
} Persistent intrusive images, ideas, recurrent dreams/nightmares
} Active avoidance of thoughts, communication or action associated with the loss
} Interference with daily functioning
} Persistent symptoms
} Suicidal ideation

May be experienced by up to 10 % of people who are grieving due to bereavement.

delayed grief

This is a type of complicated grief

  • Initially seems ‘normal’
  • Continues with disabling severity beyond ‘normal’ duration
  • Not showing diminution in experience of grief 6 months after loss
  • Loss still central in life 12 months on
36
Q

why is gaining consent important?

A
  • Respect for autonomy
  • Benefits patients (more control, more realistic expectations, more cooperative/adherent)
  • Establishes relationship of trust with patient
  • Respect for persons / dignity
  • Legal and professional requirement
  • Virtues – trustworthiness
37
Q

What is valid consent? and what information should you give?

A
  • Information – enough information should be given
  • Voluntariness- should not be coerced, should be freely given
  • Competence- the person giving consent should be competent
  • Dynamic- Patients should know they can change their mind at any point.

What information to give

PARQ acronym…

  • Procedure (nature and purpose)
  • Alternatives
  • Risks (and benefits)
  • Questions (allow them to ask)
38
Q

what are some limits to giving informed consent.

A

• Consent is not possible/necessary when patient:
o is not competent to make decision*
o poses serious risk to others if not treated or restrained (complex)
o declines “all” information
• *Previously expressed wishes/pure autonomy model v substituted judgment v best interests standard
Also, if the person doesn’t want to have the conversation about the procedure then it cannot proceed as informed consent cannot be retrieved.

39
Q

what determines if a person is deemed competent

A
  • understand relevant information
  • retain relevant information
  • weigh up relevant information
  • communicate decisions

(This applies to adults, whereas Gillick competence applies to minors)

  • competence is specific to each case
  • competence can fluctuate: confusion, panic, shock & fatigue
  • irrational or unwise decisions does not equal incompetent decision
40
Q

Why is confidentiality important from an ethical perspective?

A
  • Part of autonomy
  • Privacy Rights
  • Virtuous behaviour
  • Consequentialist justifications
  • Trust relationships
  • Beneficence
41
Q

when can confidentiality be broken

A

When confidentiality can be broken:

  • Must disclose if required by law (e.g. known or suspected communicable/transmissible disease). Tell patient if practicable, but no consent required.
  • Must disclose if ordered by a judge (but can object if you feel information wanted is not relevant)
    However, …

You must balance:

  • Public interest in doctors keeping confidences
  • Public interest in protecting society or individuals from harm
  • There must be a real and serious risk (not simply a ‘fanciful’ possibility) of physical harm to an identifiable individual or individuals
  • Disclosure must be made only to those who are in vital need of the information and only the bits of the information that are relevant.
42
Q

what are some justifiable reasons for breaches of confidence

A
  • Research (anonymised data)
  • Protection of patient
  • Protection of others
  • Detection and prosecution of serious crime
  • Legal purposes – e.g. defence of a legal claim
  • Statistical purposes/obligation to disclose
43
Q

When can there be disclosure of confidential information without consent?

A

Justifiable disclosure: in the public interest
AND
not competent to consent
OR
obtaining consent would put others at risk
OR
obtaining consent would undermine the purpose
OR
time is of the essence

44
Q

You are a GP. One of your patients, James Woodward has Hepatitis B. James is sexually active and has told you that he never uses barrier contraception because “it is not very romantic”. His partner, Harriet, is also a patient of yours and you know that James has not informed Harriet about his Hepatitis.
n What should you do? (and why?)

A

Encourage James to tell himself explain the importance of why.If he doesn’t tell him I would because it is a communicable disease.I would only disclose relevant information (that he has hep b and could pass on to you) not any other information that is not relevant.

45
Q

when is it okay to disclose a patients medical information to the police.

A

General rule: do not disclose to police unless court order or specific type of crime (e.g. terrorism)
BMA: More permissible to breach where serious crime than non serious crime

  • Notification of births and deaths
  • Fertility treatment
  • Notifiable diseases
  • Terminations of pregnancy
  • Poisonings and serious work accidents
  • Addiction to drugs
  • Terrorism
  • Court orders under the PCA 1984

there might be a reason to disclose in some circumstances of addiction, e.g. where that puts a minor patient or others at serious risk, but you DO NOT have the legal duty to disclose all addictions.

46
Q

can you break confidentiality after a person dies?

A
  • Ethical duty of confidentiality remains the same even after death
  • The GMC states that “your duty of confidentiality continues after a patient has died”
  • What about death certificates?
  • Legally: duty seems to die with the patient