Powers and borders Flashcards
The world political map
- The world political map shows territories of sovereign nation states
- These are spatially bounded areas of land, which physically define independent, self-governing countries.
- These political units are the dominant entity in the global political system and are considered to be the most important form of spatial governance
- The dynamic nature of the map is demonstrated by the formation of numerous new countries since 1990 such as:
- The Czech Republic and Slovakia becoming independent states after the dissolution of Czechoslovakia which although it was partially caused the Velvet Revolution in late 1980s, can be considered as a largely peaceful example of independence without violence being displayed.
- Whereas South Sudan seceded from Sudan in 2011, following a protracted civil war with numerous border regions such as Abyei remaining contested.
- The significance of these border changes is far more than a matter of territory as they affect sovereignty over populations and physical resources whilst also influencing global patterns (i.e trade and migration)
State - definition and characteristics
The term ‘State’ refers to the area of land, of an independent country, with well-defined boundaries, within which there is a politically organised body of people under a single government.
Characteristics of States:
- An internationally recognised defined territory
- Sovereignty
- A globally recognised government (often achieved through UN membership)
- Independence
State power and resilience
- State power is achieved through state apparatus (the set of institution and organisation which have enabled the achievement of power)
- State power is largely dependent on numerous economic, social, physical and political factors such as the following:
- The ability to exploit natural resources
- Geographical location
- Human resources
- The ability to regulate its economy.
- State power is largely dependent on numerous economic, social, physical and political factors such as the following:
- The level of resilience a state has is measured by the Fund for Peace (FFP) Fragile States Index, which looks at a wide range of social, economic, military and political indices such as the following:
- The number of refugees per capita
- The number fatalities from conflict
- The number of political prisoners
States on the world political map
- Globally there is inequality in power and influence of states
- Some states have the ability to dominate and drive global systems and have significant influence on geopolitical events
- Others have little influence and can only react or respond to global change
- Economic power can be measured in terms of trade and wealth generated over long periods
- Military power may also depend on wealth and government policy
- A state may also be influential in the global spread of its cultural attributes, such as the concept of ‘Americanisation’ which can be seen most vividly in the Caribbean
Nation - definition and characteristics
A ‘Nation’ is a large group of people with similar identities as a result of a shared descent, history, tradition, culture and language.
Characteristics of Nations:
- A lack of sovereignty
- A nation is not an independent state and if it does it is then formally considered as a nation-state
Example: The Kurds
- Kurds are a non Arab, Middle Eastern population inhabiting the region known as Kurdistan which is an extensive plateau and mountain area located amongst the countries of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Turkey and Armenia.
- The Kurds are a nation united by culture but without a state or sovereign power
Nations on the world political map
- A nation is different to a state in the sense that spatially, a nation may be confined to one country, or its people may live in an areas across adjoining countries and some may be scattered globally in the diaspora
- In modern global politics nearly all states refer to themselves as nation states as every government attempts to build a sense of national identity among its citizens
- In many nation-states the government actively promotes nationality, often through its education system and media
- This process is referred to as Nation-building
- In many nation-states the government actively promotes nationality, often through its education system and media
Sovereignty
‘Sovereignty’ refers to the absolute authority which independent states exercise in the government of the land and people in their territories.
Sovereignty is achieved via two political processes
- Internal sovereignty, in which a state has exclusive authority within its bound territory and no other state can intervene in its domestic policies
- External sovereignty, whereby sovereignty is established through mutual recognition among other sovereign states.
Sovereignty applies to:
- Rocks, soils, minerals and space beneath the ground
- Agreed areas of sea and sea-bed resources
- Agreed air space
The concepts of sovereignty and territorial integrity are being challenged by processes developing as a result of globalisation which are a potential source of conflict.
Territorial integrity
It’s the principle under international law that confirms territorial divisions and sovereign states and orders nations not to promote border changes in other nation-states
- The Charter of the United Nations, under Article 2.4, expresses the importance of territorial integrity
- The preservation of territorial integrity and sovereignty is therefore important in achieving and maintaining international security and stability in the world.
Norms
“Norms” are derived from moral principles, customs and behaviours which have developed over time throughout the world
- These norms are based on principles set out in the Charter of the United Nations which outline the universally accepted understanding of sovereignty and territorial integrity
- This includes state responsibilities of maintaining the global system and protecting their citizens such Article 2.1 of the UN Charter which states:
- “The organisation is based on the principle of sovereign equality of all its Members”
- This includes state responsibilities of maintaining the global system and protecting their citizens such Article 2.1 of the UN Charter which states:
- This means that all member states have equal right to determine their own form of government, which they can choose without outside influence.
- However the government also has the responsibility to respect the sovereignty of other states under Article 2.4 which makes specific reference to:
- “The preservation of the territorial integrity and political independence of state”
- Externally, states are obliged to promote and develop friendly external relations between nations
- Internally, the obligation of a state is to protect its citizens. This includes:
- To respect, protect and fulfil human rights
- To allow citizens to be involved in government
- To allow the freedom and opportunity to have a role in which they can contribute to society
- Governments are expected to put in place domestic measures and laws compatible with the UN charter and any other treaty obligations which they have signed
- Some states are said to be fragile because the sovereign government has been unable to fulfil these obligations or responsibilities, often because states apparatus is ineffective
- There are increasing numbers of norms and principles of accepted behaviour which are established not only by the UN but also in the charts of regional organisations such as the EU and ASEAN
Intervention
‘Intervention’ encompasses actions of international organisations in resolving conflicts or humanitarian crises arising from challenges to sovereignty and territorial integrity
Intervention can undertake several different norms:
- Economic sanctions - as outlined in Article 41 of the UN Charter
- Military intervention authorised by the UN (Article 42)
- Humanitarian assistance by Civil Society organisations, including NGOs and aid Agencies
Circumstances when intervention is perceived as necessary
- When a state government fails to protect its citizens from violation of human rights
- A direct act of aggression by another state - could be caused over territorial disputes (Korea 1950)
- Where civil war arises as a result of poor or corrupt governance
- Where there is conflict between ethnic groups
- Where religious fundamentalism and terrorist activity have serious effects
- Where TNCs have negative economic, social or environmental impacts on countries in which they invest
Geopolitics
‘Geopolitics’ involves the global balance of political power and international relations
Geopolitical power is very uneven throughout the world:
- Advanced Countries (ACs) - including the US superpower
- Emerging and Developing Countries (EDCs) - which are increasingly important economically and politically
- Low Income Developing Countries (LIDCs) - less powerful peripheral economies
- Supranational political and economic co-operations such as the UN, EU, ASEAN, OPEC and NAFTA
- Trans-state organisations such as TNCs, who have increasing influence on countries in which they locate as globalisation continues to spread
Why Sovereignty and Territorial integrity are complex issues
Intervention is controversial as it is argued that the principle of sovereignty, which is actively promoted by the UN, is undermined by the act of intervention even though sanctioned by the UN Security Council as it conflicts with Article 2.4 which stresses the importance of the preservation of territorial integrity of a state
- The geopolitics of intervention in sovereignty and territorial integrity issues is very important
- When the international community is called upon to intervene, it requires consideration of:
- Reasons why intervention is necessary
- Appropriate types of intervention
- Political composition of groups of countries and organisations involved
- Characteristic features of the country
- Government and peoples affected
- Potential socio-economic, environmental effects
Therefore Global governance of sovereignty and territorial integrity issues are complex and multifaceted
Dissolution of Czechoslovakia - reasons for the split and process
- Reasons For The Split
- Some suggest that the dissolution was inevitable, due to the vast differences in the levels of success between the two regions after the adoption of communism, whist others believe that the events of the Velvet Revolution (Between 1989 and 1992) was the causation
- Politicians saw a chance to attain and/or consolidate their power by creating another state with a separate parliament, government etc
- In a September 1992 poll, only 37% of Slovaks and 36% of Czechs favoured the dissolution
- The Process
- With the Constitution Act 542, passed on 25th November, they agreed to the dissolution of Czechoslovakia as of the 31st December 1992
- The separation occurred without violence – the dissolution of Czechoslovakia was the only former socialist state to have a peaceful breakup (unlike the Soviet Union or Yugoslavia)
Dissolution of Czechoslovakia - legacy
- Legacy
- The present relations between the Czechs and Slovaks, as many people point out, are probably better than they have ever been.
- Furthermore, it has become customary that the elected presidents pay their first and last official foreign visits during their term to the other republic of the former Czechoslovakia
- The Czech Republic continues to be Slovakia’s most important business partner
- After the dissolution in 1990s the new TV channels in the Czech Republic practically stopped using Slovak and young Czech people now have a much lower understanding of the Slovak language whereas in comparison young Slovak people still have the same knowledge of the Czech language as their predecessors.
Factors that can erode sovereignty and challenge territorial integrity
Some of the most significant measurements of this breakdown are used as indicators on the fragile states index
- Cohesion
- Security apparatus
- Factionalized elites
- Group grievance
- Economic
- Economic decline
- Uneven economic development
- Human flight and brain drain
- Political
- State legitimacy
- Public services
- Human rights and
- Social
- Demographic pressures
- Refugees and IDPs
- External intervention
The impact of current political boundary tensions on sovereignty
- The current system of nation states with clearly defined political boundaries and parameters is based on the Westphalian model (1648), which was established on the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and the sovereign equality of all states.
- These principles are currently enforced by the UN Charter
- However this system has been challenged by many current threats as control of territory and its borders have been increasingly contested in the last two decades both within and between sovereign states:
- Contested territory - Russia’s annexation of Crimea and support of separatists in Ukraine and disputes over claims of islands in the South and East China Seas
- Separatism - Claims for secession by Catalan national groups in Spain along with Scottish nationalists in the United Kingdom
- Sectarian tensions - Where political and ethnic conflict in the Middle East has challenged sovereignty and territorial integrity
- Transnational movement of terrorist and extremist activity - The border of Turkey and Syria has experienced the smuggling of foreign fighters, weapons and other military supplies which has threatened territorial integrity and sovereign control of the two countries
- The legacy of colonisation - the ‘Scramble for Africa’ in the 18th and 19th centuries, where arbitrary political boundaries and European administration of territory (Sykes-Picot Agreement: 8th May 1918), has caused ethnic partitioning
Sovereign Wealth Funds - background information
- Sovereign Wealth Funds, otherwise known as SWF, act as global ‘piggy banks; which many states rely on to build global influence and diversify their income sources
- Only a minority of countries operate SWFs, many of which are funded through raw materials such as mineral resources (Chile’s Copper Wealth and Botswana’s diamonds)
- However China’s is funded by a balance of payment surplus (occurs where export outweigh the value of imports)
Sovereign Wealth Funds in the UK
- The United Kingdom is the most popular destination for SWF investment
- China’s SWFs own ½ of the House of Fraser Department Franchise
- By 2025, China will own an estimated £100 billion of UK energy property and transport investments
- China has made an £800 million investment in the Airport City Manchester Project
- Manchester City FC is owned by Abu Dhabi
- Cadbury is headquartered in London but owned by the US TNC Kraft
- China’s SWFs own ½ of the House of Fraser Department Franchise
- Sovereign Wealth Funds have increased exponentially in the UK since 2008 due to the UK’s need to fund new projects without adding substantial portions of debt
- However some argue that the large scale investments represent a loss of sovereignty as ownership belong to foreign governments as opposed to foreign companies
- In effect, the UK government is giving power over national assets to foreign governments
The impact of TNCs on sovereignty - background
- Economic integration reduces the possibility of conflict
- Thomas Friedman created the theory that no two countries with a McDonalds have ever gone to war since the opening of McDonald’s (Golden Arch Theory)
- However this is not the case, since Russia and Ukraine, who both have McDonalds, fought in the 2014 Crimean crisis
- Thomas Friedman created the theory that no two countries with a McDonalds have ever gone to war since the opening of McDonald’s (Golden Arch Theory)
- TNCs are powerful and can lobby governments and undermine the government’s ability to make decisions in the interests of its people
- Environmental fines are often small compared to earnings and so many laws are not followed
- Arbitrage - Whereby a TNC objects to a government policy and threatens to close down its local production and increase production in another country.
- Triangulation - When a TNC evades a trade sanction because it operations above national law
The impact of TNCs on sovereignty - Ken Saro-Wiwa
- Saro-Wiwa was a famous campaigner on behalf of the Ogoni people, leading peaceful protests against the environmental damage caused by oil companies in the Niger Delta
- Ken originally protested against how Shell conducted their activity as they were using open pits and oil pipelines criss crossing the land that the Ogoni people had inhabited which destroyed their livelihoods
- No doubt that Shell were damaging the environment, they were forced to pay out 84 million dollars as a result of old pipes ballooning and spilling oil.
- This environmental exploitation has led to the rise of other militant groups that destabilize the region by being set against TNCs such as Shell and Exxon for example the so-called ‘Niger Delta Avengers’.
- He was hanged by the Nigerian military in 1995 after being charged with incitement to murder after the death of four Ogoni elders
- Numerous prosecution witnesses later admitted that they had been bribed to give evidence against Saro-Wiwa
- Allegations suggest that Shell actively subsidised a campaign of terror by security forces in the Niger Delta and attempted to influence the trial that led to Saro-Wiwa’s execution
- The lawsuit alleges that the company attempted to bribe two witnesses in his trial to testify against him
- Shell has affected sovereignty drastically by undermining the justice system, influencing government policies and allowing corruption
The impact of TNCs on sovereignty - Oil Field OPL 245
- Emails recovered by ‘Finance Uncovered and Global Witness’, showed that Shell took part in a scheme which deprived Nigeria and its people of $1.1 billion in a deal for access to one of Africa’s most valuable oil blocks - OPL 245
- The money paid for the block equates to 1 ½ times what the UN says is needed to respond to the current famine crisis in Nigeria which sees five million people face starvation
- The money also equates to more than Nigeria’s health budget
- Rise in illegal oil refineries as the benefits of the land that shell is exploiting do not find their way back to local people
- This has led to a huge drop in the production capabilities of the Niger delta from 2.5 million barrels to 1.85 million in just five years
- Shell were aware that the massive payments for the oil block would go to Dan Etete - a convicted money launderer and ex Minister of Oil along with significant proportions going to influential people in the country, such as President Goodluck Jonathan.
- Shell affected Nigeria’s sovereignty by not following the rule of law, corruption and by passing the government
The impact of TNCs on sovereignty - VRG in Cambodia
- Vietnam’s two biggest rubber companies, Hoang Anh Gia Lia and the Vietnam Rubber Group (VRG), are moving into Cambodia and Laos, seizing farmland, flouting land and forest protection laws and destroying local lives
- Both companies operate through a web of subsidies, of which the Deutsche Bank and the International Finance Corporation are key backers, which help hide the identity of their true owners
- These Rubber Barons have carried out forced land grabs without compensation, whilst satellite images show they are logging illegally in protected forest
- The indigenous people are unable to operate in their usual manner after the rice fields have been destroyed by the TNCs
- The area of the land is ½ the size of Ireland
- The indigenous people are unable to operate in their usual manner after the rice fields have been destroyed by the TNCs
The impact of TNCs on sovereignty - Bi-Water in Tanzania
- In the 1990s, in order to obtain World Bank loans of 143 million dollars, the Tanzanian government agreed to privatise their water system, a move which coincided with the promotion of privatising state-run organisations by the World Bank.
- The national water system was very ineffective with only 98,000 households in the city of Dar es Salaam of 2.5 million people having house connections
- 13% of water consumption was through unauthorised use of illegal taps and non payers
- In 2003, a 10 year lease contract was signed between the government of Tanzania and City Water, a consortium consisting of the former British Firm Biwater
- However as people had never bought water before, along with the fact that 98% of investment went to areas where the richest 20% lived, meant that poor families started to drink contaminated water as a substitute
- In 2005, the Tanzanian government cancelled their contract with Biwater and obtained a loan from India to reinstate their nationally run service
- In 2005, 3 million pounds was awarded in damages to DAWASA, the Tanzanian water utility, and ½ a million pounds in legal costs
The impact of supranational organisations such as the EU and the UN on sovereignty
- Supranational institutions represent a tier of governance above that of the individual state
- Within supranational institutions member states retain their sovereignty: they are independent countries have equal rights, and exercise exclusive control over, and responsibility for, their citizens.
- But having achieved membership countries are also bound to the requirements of the supranational body, including any treaties they sign
- In this respect , member states are said to surrender some aspects of their sovereignty since they must comply with the international or regional laws of these institutions
The United Nations
- Each of the 193 sovereign states in the UN is a member of the General Assembly
- Sovereignty and territorial integrity are important norms (Articles 2.1 and 2.4) which underpin the global political system
- However these norms are conflicted as the UN, with the backing of the security council, has the right to sanction intervention as in Articles 41 and 42
- These norms are increasingly applied by the international community when a state fails to protect its citizens
- A General Assembly World Summit in 2005, a UN resolution reaffirmed that the primary responsibility to protect its citizens still lies with the individual state, but intervention should apply in instances of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing
The UN and Darfur
- Militants from several non-Arab African tribes in Darfur, in particular the Fur and Zaghawa, started a rebellion against the Arab-led Sudanese government in 2003
- The government used a local militia, known as Janjaweed, to crush the insurgency
- The Janjaweed, with the support of Khartoum, targeted civilians of the same ethnicity as the rebel groups.
- More than 85,000 people have since been killed along with 200,000 as a result of war-related diseases
- Although the United States have described the actions as “genocide”, the UN has gone no further than the terms “crimes against humanity” and “war crimes”
- The reasoning behind it is that the genocide convention of 1948 imperils countries to act to prevent genocide when it occurs
- The chance of a solution dwindled after Sudan told the African Union, who were overseeing the peace agreement in Darfur, that it must leave the region by the end of September 2006
- Although the UN Security Council passed a resolution on the 26th August stating that it would send 17,000 peacekeepers to Darfur to replace the AU troops, the Sudanese government rejected these plans.
Reasons for and against UN intervention in Darfur
- Reasons for Intervention
- The genocide in Rwanda showed just how bad things can get if local rivalries are allowed to issue in organised killing
- There is not much point in having an international convention on genocide if no one enforces it
- The implications of allowing another genocide to take place in Africa could lead to a complete collapse in the UN’s authority
- Reasons Against Intervention
- Only the United States and NATO have the power to enforce a military solution, and they would be seen as western imperialists
- The recent examples of Iraq and Afghanistan show how much easier it is to overthrow a government than to ensure order afterwards
- As bad as Darfur could become if left alone outside intervention might well make matters even worse
The European Union (EU)
- The EU is a trading bloc which is not only an economic union but also a political union with its own parliament and a monetary ‘Eurozone’
- There are 28 sovereign member states, but their integration in the EU can bring challenges to their individual power and autonomy
- Exclusive Competence: The Union has exclusive competence to make directives and conclude international agreements
- Monetary policy for members of the Eurozone
- Members must follow a common customs union
- Shared Competence: Member States cannot exercise competence in areas where the Union has done so
- Agriculture policy
- Energy
- Transport
- Supporting Competence: The Union can carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement Member States
- Tourism
- Education
- Sport
- Exclusive Competence: The Union has exclusive competence to make directives and conclude international agreements
Pooled sovereignty definition
A term used to describe the sharing of decision making powers between states in systems of international cooperation.