PowerPoints week 4 Flashcards
What is Distance?
In the IB context, distance typically refers to the extent of differences between country pairs
Assumption: differences prevent or disturb the information flows between firms & markets
complexity to cross-border activities
Distance introduces
and increase the challenges
friction
Distance measurement: (5 types)
Geographic distance Institutional distance
Economic distance
Cultural distance
Multi-dimensional distance
Geographic distance
- concepts dates back to more than half a century ago, well established in international trade literature
- not that frequently used anymore.
- When used, measures distances between ports, capitals or major cities
Institutional Distance
The core argument: cultural distance does not entirely capture the complexity associated with cross-border activities
Introduced to the literature relatively late
Encompasses differences in the regulatory, normative, and cognitive pillars of institutions
Factors that reduce Institutional/administrative distance
o Common history and political ties
o Preferential trade agreements
o Common currency
o Political union(s)
Factors that increase Institutional/administrative distance
Factors that increase distance
o Barriers to trade
- Tariff-based barriers
- Nontariff barriers
o Unilateral
o Institutional infrastructure
Economic distance
Differences in:
• Wealth
• Income
• Standard of living
Ghemawat, identifies two approaches for international expansion:
- Aggregation, - (replicate existing competitive advantage)
- Economic Arbitrage,
Not many researches sorely rely on the concept of economic distance
However, economic factors are often incorporated in multidimensional measures
Cultural Distance
- One of the most frequently used measurements in IB
- Increased complexity to deal with foreign partners, hence more risky investments
Hofstede:
- IDV vs Collectivism: degree individuals are integrated into groups
- PDI - extent to which the less powerful members of org. and institutions accept/expect that power is distributed unequally
- UAI - society’s tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity
- MAS vs feminity - distribution of roles between genders
- LTO - notion of time
Survey of Values (Schwartz)
Schwartz (1994) surveyed value, 31countries (or 41 regions), identifying 7 country-level value orientations
=
summarized in 3 dimensions:
Conservatism vs Autonomy Hierarchy vs Egalitarianism
Mastery vs Harmony
-
Schwartz (1994) distinguishes between two levels of cultural dimensions:
culture-level vs individual-level dimensions
Measuring CD (Kogut & Singh)
Based on Hofstede’s 4 dimensional framework.
Weaknesses of CD:
- The illusion of symmetry:
- The illusion of stability
- The illusion of linearity
- the illusion of causality
- the illusion of discordance
- the assumption of corporate homogeneity
- the assumption of spatial homogeneity
- The illusion of symmetry:
- Assumes equal distance between countries (A to B = B to A)
- The illusion of symmetry:
- The illusion of stability:
- Assumes culture stays the same
- The illusion of stability:
- The illusion of linearity:
- Assumes cultural distance evolves in a linear way
- The illusion of linearity:
- The illusion of causality:
- culture is not the only aspect that causes differences
- The illusion of causality:
- the illusion of discordance:
- Assumes that all aspects of cultural distance matters equally
- the illusion of discordance:
- the assumption of corporate homogeneity
- Assumes alignment between corporate and national culture
- the assumption of corporate homogeneity
- the assumption of spatial homogeneity
- ashumus uniformity within one nation
- the assumption of spatial homogeneity
Diamond Model Approach
National prosperity not inherited, but created:
- Not due to natural endowments
- Not due to nature of labor pool
- Not due to interest rates or currency rates
National competitiveness dependent on the ability of its industries to:
- Innovate
- Upgrade
Domestic pressures & challenges create competitive firms
Single Diamond Analysis
- Factor Endowments
- Distinguishes a hierarchy of factors
- basic (natural resources, climate ect.)
- Advanced factors (capital, telecoms, infrastructure - created by individuals, companies & governments) - Demand Conditions
- Domestic demand
xx Need sophisticated domestic customers
xx Need demanding domestic customers - Related & Support Industries
- presence of internationally competitive suppliers or related industries
- often results in clusters forming - knowledge flows then help - Firm Strategy, Structure & Rivalry
- different management ideologies (German engineering vs US short-term profit maximization)
- domestic rivalry important to sustain competitive advantage
Nature of the Diamond
- Individual attributes helpful
- Diamond is however a system
- The attributes are reinforcing
- The diamond creates an environment that promotes the emergence of clusters of competitive industries
- Clusters can be expected to be:
xx Linked vertically and/or horizontally
xx Clusters are typically geographically concentrated - The diamond is unique to specific industries being studied
xx Not possible to identify a national or regional economy
diamond
Diamond Model
Role of the Government
Role of the Government = controversial
View 1: supporter and helper in the industry
View 2: Should be left to the invincible hand
Porter argues both are wrong
Government should be both: catalyst & challenger, transmit & amplify the attributes of the diamond.
Governments should seek to:
- Focus on specialized factor creation
- Avoid intervening into factor & currency markets
- Enforce product, safety & environmental standards
- Limit direct cooperation amongst industry rivals
- Promote goals that lead to sustained investment
- Deregulate competition, enforce domestic antitrust policies
Double Diamond Analysis (DDA)
Home-based Single Diamond Incomplete:
- Causality
- Predictive power
National Competitive Advantage = the capability of firms engaged in value added activities in a specific industry in a particular country to sustain this value added over long periods of time in spite of international competition.
KOREA vs Singapore
DDA Takeaway
- Possible to identify domestic&international influences on national competitiveness
- The degree to which domestic & international influences on national competitiveness matter differ across countries
- There seems to be opportunities for government policies to pursue active policies for strengthening both domestic & international diamonds for a country
- Current national competitiveness driven by strong estelements of national diamond
- Future competitiveness arguable is primarily related to the weakest element of the national diamond