Powerpoint VI: Brainwashing & PSYOPS Flashcards
Brainwashing
A term used to refer to the application of social influence tactics (often in combination with one another) that are coercive or extreme in nature
When did the term brainwashing first come into use and why?
1950s –> means of referring to apparently extreme political conversions by US soldiers captured by the Chinese during the Korean war
2 contexts where brainwashing is most common:
- Prisoners of War
- Religious cults
All studies of brainwashing have been ______ in nature
qualitative
2 contexts where brainwashing is most common:
- Prisoners of War
- Religious cults
Prisoners of War X Brainwashing (A): 10 common practices
- Forced to QUESTION beliefs that had never previously been questioned so as to undermine certainty
- Behaviours were shaped by use of REWARDS
- Led to believe that no one at HOME cared - Feeling loss of control and HELPLESSNESS
- DEGRADING conditions & public humiliation
- Induced/forced to PARTICIPATE in own indoctrination process by writing statements and organizing camp activities
- Removal of LEADERS to disrupt leadership structure and group cohesion
- Gradual ESCALATION of requests: often prefaced large requests with smaller request
- Induced ANXIETY, guilt, fear, and insecurity
- UNPREDICTABILITY of captors’ behaviour confused expectations and assumptions
- Lack of FRIENDSHIP and approval
“Forced to question beliefs so as to undermine certainty” (1A)
Explain what would happen to the prisoners of war
- Presented (sometimes by fellow soldiers) with “information” about immoral practices or injustices in their country/society
- ill-prepared to counter-argue these assertions
Possible mechanisms to explain why “Forced to question beliefs so as to undermine certainty” is a successful tactic (1A)
- Enhanced the authority of jailors because prisoners feel less knowledgable
- Create confusion & uncertainty to disrupt thinking
- Social proof if coming from fellow solders
“Behaviours were shaped by use of rewards”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (2A)
- Provided rewards (i.e., improved living conditions for cooperation
- Promised freedom for good behaviour
Possible mechanisms to explain why “Behaviours were shaped by use of rewards” is a successful tactic (2A)
- Reciprocity for rewards
- Conditioning effects
- Liking for guards who treated them well
- Consistency (if rewards are not a sufficient justification)
“Believe no one at home cared… feeling loss of control & helplessness”
Explain what would would happen to prisoners of war (3A)
Psychologically isolating people
- Withheld mail & eliminated ability to communicate with outside world
- Told they had been forgotten
- Religious expressions forbidden
Possible mechanism to explain why “Believe no one at home cared… feeling loss of control & helplessness” is a successful tactic (3A)
- Eliminated competing sources of social influence (social impact theory)
- Prison environment becomes social proof
“Degrading conditions and public humiliations”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (4A)
- Prisoners denied basic needs (food, water, hygiene)
- Forced to adhere to trivial rules and engage in public confessions of their flaws and misdeeds
Possible mechanism to explain why “Degrading conditions and public humiliations” is a successful tactic (4A)
- Decreased prestige of prisoners and established control of the jailers so that jailers were of higher authority
- Decreased liking and authority of fellow prisoners so as to eliminate their effectiveness as competing sources of influence
- Aversive experiences could disrupt thinking and thus prevent prisoners from effectively counter-arguing
- By following rules and admitting to misdeeds, commitment/consistency processes may cause participants to recognize authority of guards and begin to question their belief
“Induced/forced to participate in own indoctrination process”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (5A)
- Writer statements criticizing jailer’s country
- sometimes required to help organize indoctrination sessions
Possible mechanisms to explain why “Induced/forced to participate in own indoctrination process” is a successful tactic (5A)
Commitment & consistency
Possible mechanisms to explain why “Removal of leaders (disrupt cohesion)” (6A)
Eliminating competing sources of influence and authority
“Removal of leaders (disrupt cohesion)”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (6A)
- Soldiers often separated from their officers
- Groups were split up if a leader emerged
“Gradual escalation of requests”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (7A)
Soldiers initially asked to perform minor forms of cooperation (admitting to misdeeds) and then later more extreme requests
Possible mechanisms to explain why “Gradual escalation of requests” is a successful tactic (7A)
Commitment & consistency
“Induced anxiety, guilt, fear, and insecurity”
Explain what would happen to prisoners of war (8A)
- Prisoners were tortured and led to believe they’d be killed