Post Grant Proceedings Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who can initiate Ex Parte Reexamination?

A

Patent Owner or Third Party, including USPTO Director

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can initiate Reissue?

A

Patent Owner only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who can initiate Inter Partes Reexam?

A

Third Party only (not Patent Owner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who can initiate Inter Partes Review (IPR)?

A

Third Party only (not Patent Owner) (except plaintiff in court action challenging validity of patent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who can initiate Post-Grant Review (PGR)?

A

Third Party only (not Patent Owner) (except plaintiff in court action challenging validity of patent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who can initiate Supplemental Examination?

A

Patent Owner only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who can initiate Post-Grant Validity Review of Business Method Patents?

A

Third Party that was sued or charged with infringement (not Patent Owner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What patents qualify for Reissue?

A

Any patent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What patents qualify for Ex Parte Reexam?

A

Any patent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What patents qualify for Inter Partes Reexam?

A

Patent was an application filed on or after Nov. 29, 1999 (and up to and including September 15, 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What patents qualify for Inter Partes Review (IPR)?

A

Any patent (starting September 16, 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What patents qualify for Post-Grant Review (PGR)?

A

Patent has a claim with an effective filing date (priority) that is on or after March 16, 2013 (see §3(n)(1) of AIA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the patent qualify for Supplemental Examination?

A

Yes, but covers “any information” and thus not limited to patents (e.g., incorrect arguments of a declaration; public sale before critical date; litigation papers; small entity status wrongly claimed; etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What patents qualify for Post-Grant Validity Review of Business Method Patents?

A

Only “a covered business method patent”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Window for filing Reissue

A

Anytime before patent expires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Window for filing Ex Parte Reexam

A

Anytime during enforceability of patent (which can be 6 years past expiration due to past damages)

17
Q

Window for filing Inter Partes Reexam

A

Anytime during enforceability of patent (which can be 6 months past expiration due to past damages)

18
Q

Window for filing Inter Partes Review

A

Starting Sept. 16, 2012, later of: on or after 9 months after patent issuance or issuance of reissue; or termination of PGR (pre-AI patent does not have 9 month window)

19
Q

Window for filing Post-Grant Review?

A

Starting Sept. 16, 2012, no later than 9 months after patent issuance or issuance of reissue

20
Q

Window for filing Supplemental Examination

A

Anytime before patent expires

21
Q

Window for filing Post-Grant Validity Review of Business Method Patents

A

Starts September 16, 2012, but ends September 16, 2020

22
Q

Grounds for filing Reissue

A

The patent, through error and [without any deceptive intent], is considered to be wholly or partly inoperative or invalid

23
Q

Grounds for filing Ex Parte Reexam

A

§§ 102 and 103 based on patents and publications

24
Q

Grounds for filing Inter Partes Reexam

A

§§ 102 and 103 based on patents and publications

24
Q

Grounds for filing Inter Partes Review

A

§§ 102 and 103 based on patents and publications

25
Q

Grounds for filing Post-Grant Review

A

Any ground (except for failure to comply with the best mode requirement)

26
Q

Grounds for filing Supplemental Examination

A

Any “information” relevant to patentability

27
Q

Grounds for filing Post-Grant Validity Review of Business Method Patents

A

Like PGR, but no § 102(e) prior art

28
Q

Threshold Standard for Reissue

A

N/A

29
Q

Threshold Standard for Ex Parte Reexam

A

SNQ of Patentability

30
Q

Threshold Standard for Inter Partes Reexam

A

SNQ before Sept. 16, 2011; starting Sept. 16, 2011 is “reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail” with respect to at least one challenged claim

31
Q

Threshold Standard for Inter Partes Review

A

“reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail” with respect to at least one challenged claim

32
Q

Threshold Standard for Post-Grant Review

A

“more likely than not” that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable

33
Q

Threshold Standard for Supplemental Examination

A

SNQ of Patentability

34
Q

Threshold Standard for Post-Grant Validity Review of Business Method Patents

A

“more likely than not” that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable