Possible Questions 12 Flashcards
Explain why the campaign in the vote for women became increasingly militant in the years 1906-1914.
- Demands for Women’s suffrage increased- By 1906, a woman could be a mayor, town councillor, nurse, doctor, teacher or a factory hand. - Although women proved they could work equally as well as men, they were paid less. -> needed representation-New occupations allowed women to become rate and tax payers and therefore demand the right to representation alike other taxpayers rose. - second and third reform acts of 1867, 1884. -Many people agreed that giving to vote to uneducated male agricultural worked and unskilled labours had not damaged the country -surely giving the vote to educated women would not harm the country. Link: This led to a stronger women’s suffrage movement to develop over the discussion over the second reform act in 1866-67. 2. Failure of NUWSS to gain female suffrage-The NUWSS wanted the vote for middle class property-owning women -> Many women felt this was not enough-Believed they would achieve their end using peaceful tactics - non-violent demonstrations, petitions and the lobbying of MPs. -By 1905 the media had lost interest in the struggle for women’s rights. -Newspapers rarely reported meetings and usually refused to publish articles and letters written by supporters of women’s suffrage. Link: Emmeline Pankhurst felt that a militant campaign would once again gain the attention of those in Parliament and media3. Frustration with Liberal Government - Libs divided on the issue of women’s suffrage ; some were against it entirely and others were unclear about how to achieve it. -In 1906, many Liberal candidates expressed their support of the idea of women’s suffrage raising hopes but in reality the 1906 government had no intention of risking the issue. -1906 government ignored the issue of women’s suffrage beyond allowing women to sit on local councils -1907 Qualification of Women Act- Not enough support in Parliament to pass bills- WSPU believed violent tactics would disrupt Parliament enough so that Women’s suffrage would be passed
Explain why state control over society increased in the years 1914-1916.
- Nationalisation and centralisation became crucial for efficiency in the war effort. -Railways nationalised and profits became fixed-Shells became collectivised after the shell shortage in 1915 which led to increased casualties b/c of supply failure -Shipping and coal industry also centralised -> by 1917, a increase in shipping + decrease in strikes seen in coal industry -Imports/ production = controlled -> essentials + commodities rationed Link: factors increased efficiency in transportation and production, aiding the war effort -> taxes also needed to aid war effort2. Increased taxes necessary to maintain the cost of war. -WW1 cost GB under $5 mill a day -> increased national debt bank borrowing -> USA $2mill a dayran down GB gold reserves -Although Lib usually only taxed unproductive wealth, clearly this would not sustain war cost-Income tax rose from 9d to 6 s 1914-18-Death duties rose sharply + excess profits taxes imposed on a range of goodsLink: The strains of taxes and war meant that Censorship and Propaganda became necessary in order to maintain morale 3. Defence of Realm Act introduced 1914 -> restricted freedom of press + censored newspaper + films + -decreased pub licensing hours -Men dying b/c supply failure -Rumours of rebellion within the Liberal gov -Public had to have trust in their gov otherwise society would not function -Sep 1914 450k volunteers -> Dec 1915 55k -> evident that the war would not ‘end by christmas’-Dept. of information 1917 used radio to spread beliefs that the Somme was a success b/c boost of morale would mean increased war effort
Explain why the Liberal Party formed an electoral pact with the Labour Representative Committee (LRC) in 1903.
- Consensus- joint concerns between the LRC and the Liberals- 1902 Education Act - Chinese Labour- Free trade over tariff reform -> Ramsay Macdonald leader of LRC = moderate not radical 2. Enabled them to win more seats- ensured a degree of political growth for Liberals because it was based on ensuring the Party would be able to stand in anti-Conservative constituencies and there would be no opposition from the Labour - Conservative Party was becoming increasingly unpopular during the years 1902 to 1906. - inevitably benefitted the emerging Labour movement. In order to further- exploit this development the Liberals formed the pact with the LRC3. Economics of election- Labour + TU closely linked -> considerable financial support -> £150k - financial strength of the LRC made it an attractive partner in the eyes of the Liberals. - did not need to campaign in constituencies which Lib knew Lab would win -> reduced cost
Explain why the House of Lords rejected the People’s Budget in 1909.
- Hidden reforms in the finance bill- Budget included licensing + land valuation -> alrdy rejected -> H of L stand up to underhand tactics- Cons belief that budget designed to side step their power b/c libs = maj in H of C -> Cons. maj H of L- power of Aristocracy already been reduced 1905-1909eg. Electoral reform 1884 = less influence on WC-> less say in local affairs 2. Link: This blatant attempt to reduce the power of aristocracy was also evident in that the Budget went above and beyond normal financial provisions- introduced child allowances £10 a year for every child land valuation, graduated income tax -> seen as socialist- many were landowners -> felt subjected to unfair treatment - Alrdy felt under attack financially by 1876 reforms - context of 80’s + Ag depression -> less moneyLink: Such opposition was not only confined to the Conservative party but also widespread3. Widespread opposition- many liberals had doubts- Irish Nationalists MP’s opposed b/c whisky export trade = vital to employment -> brewers+ distillers would have to pay duty- motorists unimpressed -> HR 1893 didn’t show pub support + budget wasn’t a mandate -> duty to protect GB institutions
Explain why the 1911 Parliament Act was passed.
- Long Term rejection of Liberal bills by H of L- maj. of H of L (355) were Conservative- used by Cons. to undermine Lib gov. - Education Bill 1906 aimed to appeal to NC- meant Libs could not fulfil electoral promise to NC- Trade Disputes Bill + Plural voting bill-> both major items on Lib gov legislative programme- Such bills also undermined the power of aristocracyLink: blatant attempt to reduce the power of aristocracy was also evident in that the Budget went above and beyond normal financial provisions2. 1909 Budget - introduced child allowances £10 a year for every child land valuation, graduated income tax -> seen as socialist- many were landowners -> felt subjected to unfair treatment - Alrdy felt under attack financially by 1876 reforms - context of 80’s + Ag depression -> less money- However, H of L didn’t normally reject financial bills- Non-elected H of L rejected a elected H of C billLink: This led to great controversy in the Liberal Gov. with belief that the power of the H of L should be reduced3. H of L reluctant to pass bill b/c included provisions alrdy rejected- Budget included licensing + land valuation -> alrdy rejected -> H of L stand up to underhand tactics- Cons belief that budget designed to side step their power b/c libs = maj in H of C -> Cons. maj H of L- power of Aristocracy already been reduced 1905-1909eg. Electoral reform 1884 = less influence on WC-> less say in local affairs
Explain why the third Home Rule Bill was introduced in 1912.
- Long term support for Home Rule-2 attempts were made by Liberals under British Prime Minister Gladstone to enact home rule bills. -> Gladstone had become personally committed to granting Irish home rule in 1885. - 1st attempt -> 1886 Home Rule to Ireland in honour rather than being compelled to do so one day in humiliation. -> His bill was defeated in the Commons by 30 votes.- second attempt 1892 -> steered through the Commons with a majority of 30 votes, only to be defeated in the Conservative’s pro-unionist majority controlled House of Lords.Link: It was this same conservative majority in the H of L which arguably caused the need for a general election 19102. INP held balance of power- The rejection of the 1909 Budget was seen as a last straw by many Libs - Lib gov used this as an opportunity to once and for all reduce power of H of L by passing the parliament act- King George V agreed to flush H of L if Lib gov. won a general election - Lib gov would not have majority without INP - Redmond agreed to support Asquith on the promise that HR would be introduced -> threatened to disrupt parliament if not Link: Asquith was not willing to call Redmond’s bluff b/c the long term importance of reducing the power of the H of L3. Parliament Act reduced the power of the lords - Previously the H of L had been the main factor to why the HR bill was not passed in 1892 - 1911 Parliament Act removed the ability of the H of L to veto bills and replaced this with the power of delay- The maj. of Libs in the H of C meant that HR could finally stand a chance
Explain why issues arising from the Boer War contributed to a Liberal Victory in the 1906 General Election.
- Uncaring - B war conc. camps 26k women + children = immoral - Taff Vale Judgement 1901 -> seen as repression to not allow workers to strike- Reminded of this by Chinese Slavery 1902-4 -> appalling living conditions-> separation of men + women - flaggings allegedly authorised by MilnerLink: B war led to a shift in public opinion for imperialism 2. Tariff reform - Tariff reform controversial -> idea of free trade was practically a religion- public against empire against + imperial preference - created op. for libs to criticise Cons. gov -> reminding public of treatment of WC with TV + CS, using ‘Big loaf, little loaf’ campaign to show WC that tariff reform would lead to increased prices - Many cons. members supported free trade- Churchill + Duke of Devonshire cross the floor to Libs- Tariff reform split Cons. party -> split party = weak partyLink: Chamberlain felt that tariff reform was needed to recover the funds used for B war3. Debt- B war cost £210 mill - Education act 1902 - Granted ratepayers’ money to voluntary Church of England schools -> NC voluntary schools funds from the state rather than from rates - Licensing act 1904 -> used by NC to castigate gov for intro a levy on industry so brewers could receive compensation for losses through NC taxes -> Cons. gov. couldn’t fund acts without taxes b/c B war drained finances of state
Explain why Liberal governments failed to grant women the right to vote.
- Liberals were divided on the issue of women’s suffrage -some were against it entirely and others were unclear about how to achieve it. -> The concern was that extension of the Franchise to women was likely to help the Unionists-universal adult suffrage might benefit Labour. ->In 1906, many Liberal candidates expressed their support of the idea of women’s suffrage raising hopes but in reality the 1906 government had no intention of risking the issue.- Too controversialLink: This controversy was heightened by suffragette militancy 2. Suffragette militancy-Although drew attention from the public,in the long term it allowed the 1906 government to ignore the issue of women’s suffrage -> beyond allowing women to sit on local councils (1907 Qualification of Women Act). - violent tactics used by suffragette militancy groups galvanised the opposition -able to accuse women of being emotionally unbalanced and unfit to take a more active role in society. Link: It supported the idea that women were irresponsible 3. Women biologically different -> too emotional + sentimental - as the suffragettes smashed windows and sent peppered letters. ->legitimate reason for the liberal government not to introduce a reform - no government at the time would have given into the behaviour and violence of the suffragette militants. - allow men to represent women -> women having vote may split families + divide society as a whole
Explain why the Liberal Party achieved a landslide victory in the 1906 General election.
- Boer war- Cost $210 mill -> debt 25% - Conc. camps women + children 26k -> immoral- ‘National Efficiency’ -> 8k/11k Manchester deemed unfit for service - money needed for social reforms rather than f.p. -> highlighted by Booth + Rowntree investigations Link: It was the effects of the B war which highlighted Balfour’s cold and callous actions 2. Balfour’s mistakes-> Lost vote of WC- lack of action Taff Vale judgement 1901 = uncaring -> prohibited WC from striking only set up royal commission-highlighted by Chinese Slavery 1902-4 - C workers appalling living conditions-> separation of men + women - flaggings allegedly authorised by Milner- publicly viewed as morally wrong- reminded public of B war conc. camps - WC not valued -> lost job op.Link: Arguably one of Balfour’s greatest mistakes was allowing tariff reform to split the conservative party3. Tariff reform- Tariff reform controversial -> idea of free trade was practically a religion- public against empire against + imperial preference - created op. for libs to criticise Cons. gov -> reminding public of treatment of WC with TV + CS, using ‘Big loaf, little loaf’ campaign to show WC that tariff reform would lead to increased prices - Many cons. members supported free trade- Churchill + Duke of Devonshire cross the floor to Libs- Tariff reform split Cons. party -> split party = weak party
Explain why Britain formed the Entente Cordiale with France
- Germany’s economic strength. - 1870 - 1900 GB declined from being the world’s leading industrial nation to third in economic performance. - G greater population than GB, 1910-1911 20% greater -> larger work force and a larger consumer market. - By 1906 to 1910, the German percentage of world manufacturing capacity was greater than Britain’s. - 860, Britain was the captain of the steel industry producing as much as two times the amount of steel Germany was producing. 1914 1/2 - evident that GB econ in decline + beginning to rely more heavily on German exports.-> left GB vulnerable as G became a stronger power which upset the balance of power Link: Decline in GB econ proved that it could not afford to maintain tensions with France. 2. Entente Cordiale would reduce costs for GB- Long term tension over Suez Canal -> Opened under French control 1869 -> Gb control over Suez still not internationally recognised-> Suez provided GB with trade routes - By its terms, Fr promised not to challenge GB control over Egypt-> GB only concern with Morocco was the link to Egypt -> reduce cost of troops needed to maintain power in Egypt -diplomatic support from France meant they could afford to compete with G - Didn’t have to provide military support to France Link: Entente Cordial would also mean that GB wouldn’t have to provide military support to Jap 3. Prevent being drawn into R-J war - Anglo-Jap alliance 1902 -> If Jap attacked by more than 1 nation then GB had to intervene - Franco-Russian Alliance 1892 -> force Fr to fight for Russia against Jap -> GB just out of B war with negative impacts in domestic policies -> another war would lead to extreme decrease in support for Cons. party - In order to avoid going to war, both powers “shucked off their ancient rivalry” and resolved their differences.
Explain why the issue of ‘Chinese slavery’ in 1903 caused opposition to the Conservative Government.
- Upset WC- lost opportunity to work -> lowered amount of av. jobs- giving GB jobs to immigrants- reminder of Taff Vale -> Balfour didn’t reverse decision only set up a royal commission- prevented them from immigration- worried about policy applying in GBLink: WC also upset by the immorality of the way in which Chinese workers were being treated2. Immoral - appalling living conditions-> separation of men + women - flaggings allegedly authorised by Milner- publicly viewed as morally wrong- reminded public of B war conc. camps 26k women + children diedLink: Uncaring, inhumane view which the public had of the Cons. party stemmed from the imperialism displayed during B war3. Decreased support for imperialism due to B war- Chinese workers used to revive S. African econ- f.p. cons. imperialist -> libs not- feared this would become acceptable- gov. again focused more on f.p. than internal problems -> national efficiency + Booth + Rowntree -> poverty
Explain why a new coalition government was established in December 1916.
1.Asquith’s failures-Ammunition shortages-Country was not producing enough ammunition for W frontdispatch from Colonel Repington in the Times blamed lib gov for shell shortage -attempt to land a GB force at Dardanelles in April 1915 to knock Turkey out of war failed-Decreased A’s popularity only 130 of 272 seats willingly support A Link: Cons. were never content with A’s leadership -> 2.Popularity of L.G. increased-as head of ministry of munitions -> machine guns increased by 248,670 1914-18-established the idea of consulting industrial experts in areas of prod. + supply -> national e. -shared the same frustration with war as Cons. -> willing to give up lib values for the benefit of the nationas war minster -> not afraid to criticise General Haig + Sir Robertson for the military miscalculation of Battle of the Somme Link: Frustrations with war led to L.G. belief that War Committee was the only way 3.Wanted to reform Military incompetence -> somme -L.G. believed he understood + represented expectations of a nation-Asquith’s duties were too heavy -> unreasonable to expect dedication to war aswell-However, A saw War Committee as a vehicle for L.G. to undermine his power-Demanded to be head of war committee b/c he was essentially being demoted-L.G. threatened to leave Lib party, Cons backed L.G. in a new coalition gov-through newspapers, public opinion turned against A -> A resignation subsequent L.G.+Cons Gov
Explain why there were concerns about the British economy by 1902.
- Social investigations by Booth + Rowntree- highly unprecedented levels of poverty in diff parts of GB- 1889-1903 -> Booth 30% E. London below ‘pov line’ - Rowntree -> 78% of York some degree of poverty- proved poverty not laziness-> common belief- Lib. gov. self-help system not working-> social reform- idea of taxing ‘unproductive’ wealth to provide for poor became well- supported idea by LibsLink: It was the poor physical conditions of recruits for B war that brought the scale of poverty unearthed by B+ R to surface2. B war + national efficiency- Manchester -> 8k/11k volunteers turned away- GB lost its military supremacy -> difficulty defeating small number of dutch farmers - mishaps of B war brought concerns for ‘national efficiency’ of GB against Eu neighbours esp. G + USA econ grown stronger which threatened GB security- low levels of national efficiency threatened Gb. econ. b/c it contained a workforce that was unfit to work which would decrease prod. Link: Such low levels of national efficiency allowed Germany to gain a foot ahead of Britain in terms of economy3. Germany- By end of 19th century GB no longer world’s strongest industrial nation -> serious competition from G- eg. prod. of coal 1880 GB 3x as much by 1906 G same- In G, a system of welfare benefits + old age pensions already been established 1880’s- G provision of economic security provided political stability in G - G able to support growing pop. -> increased workforceeg. 1871-1907 -> 9% increase in workforce -> Lib gov. understood that in order to compete with G same measures needed to be taken
Explain why social reform became an issue by 1906.
- Social investigations by Booth + Rowntree- highly unprecedented levels of poverty in diff parts of GB- 1889-1903 -> Booth 30% E. London below ‘pov line’ - Rowntree -> 78% of York some degree of poverty- proved poverty not laziness-> common belief- Lib. gov. self-help system not working-> social reform- idea of taxing ‘unproductive’ wealth to provide for poor became well- supported idea by LibsLink: It was the poor physical conditions of recruits for B war that brought the scale of poverty unearthed by B+ R to surface2. B war + national efficiency- Manchester -> 8k/11k volunteers turned away- GB lost its military supremacy -> difficulty defeating small number of dutch farmers - mishaps of B war brought concerns for ‘national efficiency’ of GB against Eu neighbours esp. G + USA econ grown stronger which threatened GB security- public -> realisation that reforms must be accepted to increased national efficiency thus increasing GB’s economy Link: Britain’s lack of national efficiency allowed Germany to compete with Britain. This threatened the balance of power. 3. Germany- By end of 19th century GB no longer world’s strongest industrial nation -> serious competition from G- eg. prod. of coal 1880 GB 3x as much by 1906 G same- In G, a system of welfare benefits + old age pensions already been established 1880’s- G provision of economic security provided political stability in G - G able to support growing pop. -> increased workforceeg. 1871-1907 -> 9% increase in workforce -> Lib gov. understood that in order to compete with G same measures needed to be taken
Explain why the Education Act was introduced in 1902.
- Social investigations by Booth + Rowntree- highly unprecedented levels of poverty in diff parts of GB- 1889-1903 -> Booth 30% E. London below ‘pov line’ - Rowntree -> 78% of York some degree of poverty- proved poverty not laziness-> common belief- Lib. gov. self-help system not working-> social reform- idea of taxing ‘unproductive’ wealth to provide for poor became well- supported idea by LibsLink: It was the poor physical conditions of recruits for B war that brought the scale of poverty unearthed by B+ R to surface2. B war + national efficiency- Manchester -> 8k/11k volunteers turned away- GB lost its military supremacy -> difficulty defeating small number of dutch farmers - mishaps of B war brought concerns for ‘national efficiency’ of GB against Eu neighbours esp. G + USA econ grown stronger which threatened GB security- Such problems in younger generations could effect the future of BritainLink: Balfour understood that the current education system would lead to greater problems with national efficiency in the future3. Current Education system not working-The “Cockerton Judgment” of 1901 caused a crisis by undermining the legality of “higher grade schools” for children over 12. -> A temporary fix allowed the schools to operate one more year. - A second issue involved the 14,000 church schools, called “voluntary schools”, run chiefly by the Church of England and including some Catholic schools. -They were poorly funded and did not receive local tax moneys, but educated a third of the school children. -too many overlapping jurisdictions, with 2568 school boards set up by the Elementary Education Act 1870, as well as all existing School Attendance Committees. - Balfour recognised that these needed to be abolished for anything to be done