Pornography Flashcards
Brownmiller quote
‘Pornography is the undiluted essence of anti-female propaganda’
Patricia Hill Collins quote
Pornography must be ‘reconceptualized as an example of the interlocking nature of race, gender, and class oppression’ - race cannot be an additional problematic layer as an afterthought
Langton quote
Pornography is the ‘ruling power’ when it comes to the domain of sex
Morgan quote
Pornogrpahy is the theory and rape is the practice
Stoltenberg quote
Pornography tells lies about women [but] tells the truth about men
Willis quote
‘What I like is erotica, and what you like is pornographic’
Rea definition
Needs a neutral definition which “respects commonly held views and widely shared intuitions [about pornography] and attempts to capture these in a set of necessary and sufficient conditions
MacKinnon and Dworkin definition
Pornography as ‘graphic sexually explicit materials that subordinate women through pictures or words’. MacKinnon (1993) argues that abuse and coercion need not be present in the production of all pornography for it to subjugate women, because all pornography is made under conditions of inequality based on sex.
MacKinnon (and response)
Frames pornography as speech
1. Pornography eroticizes male dominance and female submissiveness and puts this forward as the apparent truth about sex. It is not merely what it depicts; it institutionalises the sexuality of male supremacy.
2. Women are hence stripped of authority and credibility and silenced by pornography. When they try and report assaults, they are often not believed. Her locution does not have uptake.
3. Pornography permits men to have whatever they want sexually. It is their ‘truth about sex’.
4. Homosexuality is derived from their mimicry or parody or reversal of the standard arrangements, which affirms rather than undermines or qualifies the standard sexual arrangement
5. All pornography is made under conditions of inequality based on sex and it constitutes sexual harassment - a ‘White Only’ sign is ‘only words’, but it not treated merely as offensive speech but as an act of segregation and discrimination
BUT Willis - MacKinnon’s ‘inability to see women as exercising even limited autonomy leads to the sort of cognitive dissonance whereby MacKinnon can declare women to be definitively silenced, even as she herself is an outspoken and influential public figure.
MacKinnon - crucial difference between verbal sexual harassment and pornography, which she equates - in the former, the words are aimed at a target of abuse, while in the latter, they are aimed at a man, to please, and not to insult
Hornsby
Against speech act. A condition of linguistic communication is reciprocity, and pornography fails this because there is no meaningful communication involved
Bird
Rebuts Hornsby: uptake of an intention (ie, reciprocity) is not necessary for illocutionary action. A judge passes sentence whether the prisoner knows it or not
Langton thesis (3)
- Rebuts the free speech argument - pornographic utterances have something in common with the ‘performatives’ of speech-act theory: they may authoritatively establish ‘which moves in the sexual game aren’t legitimate,’
- Pornography is thus like a biased umpire in a game among players of vastly unequal power.
- Existing ‘liberal debate’ operates on the frail assumption that ‘pornographic utterances are made by a powerless minority, a fringe group especially vulnerable to moralistic persecution,’ whereas in reality ‘pornography’s voice is the voice of the ruling power
Langton - effects of pornographic speech
1) subordinates and silences women in ranking them as inferior,
2) in legitimating discrimination against them, and
3) in depriving women of important free speech rights (silencing through illocutionary disablement, where women saying ‘no’ is seen as sexy and not taken as non-consenting)
Langton - three types of speech
Pornography’s locutionary actions (depicting subordination) and perlocutionary effects (causing subordination) are less controversial; what is controversial is its illocutionary force, the ‘constitutive subordination’ claim. Illocutionary force’s felicity conditions: 1) where the speaker’s intentions are satisfied; 2) whether the speaker achieves uptake, with the hearer recognising the illocution performed; 3) whether the speaker is authoritative relative to the intended illocution’s domain. Langton argues pornography is authoritative for the hearers who learn that violence is sexy and coercion legitimate.
Perlocutionary - ‘I pronounce you a married couple’. Illocutionary - ‘blacks are not permitted to vote’
Saul
Rebuts Langton:
1. She has to reject the speech act approach to provide blanket condemnation of porn
2. Her argument of porn always subordinating women is wrong and offensive, arguing that feminists who enjoy porn are defending the subordination of women
3. Only utterances in contexts can be speech acts
4. Langton’s first and second considerations cannot really hold at once - the audience that holds porn to subjugate women (anti-porn feminists) would not actually be affected by porn’s subjugation of women, so pornography cannot both lead to subordination and be subordination
5. Cannot say porn always constitutes harm - the best that Langton can do is to claim that pornographic viewings can sometimes cause the subordination of women. ‘Feminist porn’ can exist, and only some viewings illocutionarily subordinate women
Eaton
Porn is a double-edged sword:
1. Can be responsible for the eroticisation of violence, dominance and inequality
2. Can shape erotic taste in egalitarian ways
3. The burden of proof for pornography being causally linked to violence against women is too high, eg. smoking is neither necessary nor sufficient in causing lung cancer
Antony
- Pornography is not a speech act (which only covers verbal communication).
- Even if it were a speech act, its problematic effects could not be illocutionary effects.
- Even when pornography works as Langton says it does, the ‘silencing’ does not involve the violation of any speech right we ought to expect to be protected by law
- Pornography’s reporting and constructing of women’s sexuality are in tension with one another, and one of them must go. Cannot both falsely report something about women (describe some state of affairs) and make women fit the description (bring about that state of affairs)
- There is a difference between pictorial and linguistic expression because of ambiguity
- When a woman’s ‘no’ is rejected, it is not that uptake is disabled, but the recognition that a woman is refusing is part of the turn-on! Same with BDSM porn, arguing it sends the message that it’s okay to have sex with a woman even if she refuses
(But does the silencing claim justify rape?)
Finlayson
Argues for MacKinnon, not Austin!
1. Supports MacKinnon’s silencing argument, but argues it is too extreme - the most that can be argued is pornography may tend to perpetuate subordination, which an empirical matter of cause and effect.
2. It is more likely that the reason why saying ‘no’ to a man doesn’t work is there exists unequal power between men and women, to which porn contributes, so women’s refusal is effectively defused
3. MacKinnon does not need Austin or speech act theory for her theories to hold true