Populations Flashcards
Define and briefly describe dietary reference values and current dietary intakes in the population
Population-level ‘average’ - required over ‘reasonable’ period of time
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy (COMA) - they give the advice
o Requirement to maintain health in ‘healthy’ individuals.
o Assumes that energy and other nutrient requirements met.
o However, for most nutrients, insufficient data to establish any of the DRVs with confidence
EAR - estimated average requirement: o The average requirement for a nutrient for a class of individuals o By definition, will meet the needs of 50% of the population
• Lower Reference Nutrient Intake (LRNI):
o 2 S.D. less than the EAR
o Will meet the needs of 2.5% of the population
• Reference Nutrient Intake (RNI)
Describe the general framework for making recommendations and guidelines on a healthy diet.
GRADE
- balance between desirable and undesirable effects
- quality of evidence - consistent or direct?- publication bias? - magnitude of effect?
- values and preferences
- costs - worth the cost?
Describe scientific challenges in nutritional epidemiology
may have issues collecting data - weighed record/food diary?
may have error in dietary assessment: • Sampling bias • Response bias • Estimation of portion size • Inappropriate coding of foods • Use of food composition tables
• Cause and effect difficult to disentangle, unless you have repeated measures over time - may be something to do with whole diet rather than single food
Discuss barriers to healthy eating, and a life course and food chain approaches to reduce food poverty and obesity
- Low income and debt
- Poor accessibility to affordable healthy foods
- Factors in food production and the food chain - such as the nutrient content of easily available, cheap, processed foods which can be high in fat, sugar or salt.
- Poor literacy and numeracy skills - barriers to information on maintaining a healthy diet, household budget management and employment. Better labelling.
List 4 direct health related harms from excessive alcohol intake and 4 social harms.
hypertension stroke coronary heart disease pancreatitis liver disease
divorce
isolation from friends
loss of job
isolation from family
What strategies could a government employ to reduce the amount of alcohol consumed by the population?
limit advertising minimum price levels reduction in licensing hours prohibit products that appeal to young people more research
Describe some of the influences on social norms associated with drinking among young people
Positive:
previous levels of consumption
entertainment portrayals
alcohol advertising
Negative:
alcohol involved problems
media attention to alcohol-involved problems
concern about alcohol
name three common types of medical error
- Medication error – the most common single preventable cause of patient injury
- Missed & delayed diagnosis – e.g. failure to recognise a patient is seriously ill
- Perioperative – e.g. needless infection, wrong site, wrong side, wrong patient, lack of DVT prophylaxis
describe the difference between a person approach and system approach in terms go patient safety
- Person approach - focuses on the unsafe act, ‘name and shame’ individuals
- System approach - errors seen as consequence of unsafe systems; aim is to build defences and safeguards- robust systems that protect patients from harm
describe some methods of preventing failure in care systems
- Basic standardisation.
- Memory aids - checklists.
- Feedback regarding compliance with
standards. - Awareness-raising and training (10-1)
e.g: • Commonequipment,standardordersheets,and written policies/procedures/protocols • Personalchecklists • Feedbackofinformationoncompliance • EmphasisonAwarenessandTraining
describe some mathods of identifying and miticating failure in care systems
- Second tier strategies focus on “catching/identifying” instances when standardised approach is not used;
- Seek to reduce opportunities for humans to make mistakes utilising more sophisticated failure prevention; often referred to as “error-proofing” (10-2)
EG: • Makingthedesiredactionthedefault • Reminders,DifferentiationofRoles,Constraints, Affordances • Decisionaidsbuiltintothesystem • Intentionalredundancy • Schedulingkeytasks
what are the three tiers for designing reliable care systems
Prevent Failure T1
Identify and Mitigate Failure T2
System Redesign T3
define penetrance
Degree of phenotypic expression/manifestation.
define Allelic heterogeneity
Ability of different mutations in the same gene to give rise to different clinical phenotypes
What are the possible categories of explanation for the health inequalities (across socioeconomic groups) that we observe in Northern Ireland.
- According to the Ottawa Charter, what are the four main categories of action that policy makers should aim for to reduce health inequalities. ? Describe the principle of proportionate universalism.
- Describe any three features of a public health intervention that might increase inequalities ?
- What should doctors do to try to reduce health inequalities?
- The Marmot report Fairer Society Healthy Lives urges policy action in a number of areas to reduce health inequalities including (i) giving every child the best start in life and (ii) creating fair employment and good work for all. Give two examples of actions that policy makers might consider in each of these areas.
.
describe the difference between inequality and inequity
Inequality:
- Some variations or differences in individual-level health are inevitable – our life is subject to stochastic processes !
o BUT we must ask ourselves WHY should they vary
o according to socioeconomic status, geographical area, age, disability, gender or ethnic group?
o affects of these variations may be more than additive
- Many Inequalities in Health are considered as avoidable and unacceptable variations
Inequity:
• Inequity - “lack of fairness” or injustice
• Equity - ensuring each individual is given the opportunity to attain their full potential for health
• ….The absence of unfair and avoidable or remediable differences in health among social groups.”
describe the ‘absolute gap’ in terms of health inequalities
- the absolute difference between the extremes of deprivation
- advantage: intuitive and straightforward to explain
- disadvantage: focuses on extremes - doesn’t take account of patters of inequalities observed across the intermediate groups
describe the slope index of inequality (SII) in terms of health inequalities
- the gradient of health observed across the deprivation scale
- measures difference in health outcomes between theoretical most and least deprived individuals
- sensitive to experience of entire population rather than just extremes of deprivation
describe the relative index of inequality (RII) in terms of health inequalities
- describes the gradient of health observed across the deprivation scale, relative to the average for the observed population (by dividing the SII by the mean)
- value of RII - tells you magnitude of inequality in relation to the mean - represents proportionate change in the health outcome across the population
- allows inequalities to be compared and contrasted across a number of different health indicators and also to be monitored over time
What are the possible categories of explanation for the health inequalities (across socioeconomic groups) that we observe in Northern Ireland.
• Cultural/Behavioural - individual behaviour & lifestyle factors
• Materialistic/structural - economic & associated socio-structural factors
- Inequitable distribution of resources.
• Social Selection - converse view that health determines social position (not other way about)
- eg get sick - lose job - fall down social order
- most people don’t think this is a good explanation
• Artefactual - observation may result from artificial classification of social class - the way we classify social class - usually classed due to job - Widening in gap isn’t real, it is due to the way class and health are measured.
describe some of the difficulties in reducing health inequalities
• Limited evidence-base to guide
policy
• Multi-faceted interventions required
• Many modifiable determinants lie outside direct influence of health service
• Delay between intervention and measurable outcomes - especially for ‘upstream’ interventions