Politics: Republican dominance, 1890-1912 Flashcards
Political tensions and divisions: the rise of Republican dominance:
By the early 1890s it was possible to see how two-party politics operated in the United States, and how the identity and ideology of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party had developed after the political battles over Reconstruction. But the American political system was not yet fully formed. The two main political parties were still evolving in response to the speed and scale of economic growth and social change. New forms of politics emerged and both the Republican and the Democratic Party had to adapt and change. The Republicans were more successful in managing this process, at least at first. Their victory in the 1896 election led to a long period of **Republican political dominance*. Between 1868 and 1932, Grover Cleveland and Woodrow Wilson were the only two Democrats to interrupt the long chain of Republican presidents that stretched from Ulysses Grant to Herbert Hoover
Two of these new political forces were particularly important. The first was the rise of Populism, which brought about fundamental change (and deep divisions) in the Democratic Party. The second was Progressivism, a wide-ranging reform movement which deeply influenced the Republican Party, especially under Theodore Roosevelt. By 1912, Progressivism had become the central issue in American politics: a new National Progressive Party was formed; Progressivism deeply divided the Republicans; and Woodrow Wilson, strongly influenced by Progressive ideas, was leading the revival of the Democratic Party
Completing the political nation:
Before 1890, American politics was not yet truly national. Between 1867 and 1912, 12 new states were added to the Union, six of them in 1889-90. These new states contained important new voters, with new political priorities. This required the main political parties to adapt and change
Democratic Party support:
The core of Democrat support was the Solid South. For a century after the Civil War, the Democrat candidate won the South in every election except one (Al Smith in 1928). This meant two important things: first, the only question that mattered in elections was which Democratic candidate would be nominated; second, it gave segregationist Southerners a stranglehold on the national party. The Democrats could also rely on support in the industrial northeast, partly from business but especially from blue collar workers and recent immigrants. During the 1890s the Democrats won a lot of support from small farmers in the Western states. This rather contradictory coalition of support was the Democratic base until the 1960s
Political balance between the Democrats and the Republicans:
In the ‘era of weak presidents’, the political balance between the parties was very even, as was shown by the close election battles between Grover Cleveland and his Republican rival Benjamin Harrison in 1884, 1888 and
1892. There was relatively little difference between them in policy and ideology; both Cleveland and Harrison supported conservative financial policies of ‘sound money’ backed by the gold standard. When Grover Cleveland won back the White House in 1892, therefore, it seemed likely to continue ‘politics as usual’. But the 1890s proved to be turbulent years, with a financial panic, economic depression, violent strikes, and the rise of Populism. The Democratic Party became more radical and more divided; a revitalised, pro-business Republican Party swept to power in the ‘turning point election’ of 1896
Gold standard:
A system of finance that maintains the value of the currency by tying the currency to a fixed price backed by gold reserves. In the United States in the late nineteenth century, supporters of the gold standard argued that it ensured ‘sound money’; opponents claimed it harmed the economy by restricting the amount of money in circulation. In 1900 continuation of the system was confirmed by the Gold Standard Act
Populism:
Populism first appeared as a political party at state level in 1890 and quickly became a grass roots mass movement, with strong support in the South, the Western Plains and the Rocky Mountains. In 1892 the Populists (also known as the People’s Party) set out their manifesto in the Omaha Platform. The Populists did well in the 1892 elections and gained even more support in the mid-term elections of 1894
The aim of Populism was to focus grievances and discontent into a political campaign for radical reform. The Populists demanded:
• government ownership of the railroads
• the opportunity for settlers and farmers to be able to acquire land from corporations and foreigners
• a graduated income tax (the tax you pay relates to how much you earn)
• a currency that was not controlled by private bankers
• ‘free silver’: the end of the gold standard and unlimited use of silver to increase the money supply
The political impact of Populism seemed sudden but its roots went deeper. From the 1870s, a range of protest movements had emerged, such as Patrons of Husbandry (often known as The Grange) and various Famers’ Alliances. These rural movements sometimes joined forces with workers’ groups such as the Knights of Labor. In the early 1890s these disparate groups coalesced to form the Peoples Party. The impact of Populism was boosted by the charismatic leadership of William Jennings Bryan, a lawyer from Omaha who soon gained a national reputation as a rising political star
The Omaha Platform:
The People’s Party set out its political manifesto at Omaha in July 1892. Its theme was the need to fight corruption in government and the legal system, to save the nation from ‘moral, political and material ruin’. The Omaha Platform claimed that the people are demoralized; newspapers are muzzled; public opinion silenced; labor impoverished; ownership of the land is concentrated in the hands of a few capitalists
Free Silver:
Populism was obsessed with reform of the currency. Populists saw the gold standard as the main reason for the depressed rural economy. They wanted more money to be available more cheaply, to make loans more available and debts easier to pay. Some Populists believed in a variant theory called ‘bimetallism’, in which both gold and silver would circulate. Most economists denounced the ideas of free silver and bimetallism as unrealistic and unworkable, but they attracted mass support in the 1890s
William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925):
William Jennings Bryan was a lawyer from Illinois who settled in Nebraska. In 1890 he was elected to the House of Representatives as a Democrat. Bryan was a fundamentalist Christian, a pacifist, an anti-imperialist, a supporter of Prohibition, and a believer in ‘free silver’. With support from the Populists, he won the Democrat presidential nomination in 1896 but lost narrowly. He ran for president twice more, in 1900 and 1908, but lost again. From 1913, he was Secretary of State in the Wilson administration
The panic of 1893:
The Democratic Party was weakened by the Panic of 1893 and the economic depression that followed. The party became more divided after its poor showing in the 1894 mid-term elections. Grover Cleveland and his pro-business allies, the ‘Bourbon Democrats’, stuck to traditional laissez-faire economics and to keeping the gold standard. In 1895 Cleveland got financial backing from Wall Street: the banker J. Pierpont Morgan and his allies lent the government $62 million to prop up its gold reserves. This gave ammunition to Cleveland’s opponents, because he had sided with the money men of Wall Street rather than the ‘little man’. Mary Lease, a spokeswoman for Kansas Populists, claimed in 1895: ‘This is no longer a government of the people, for the people and by the people, but a government of Wall Street, for Wall Street and by Wall Street
The Democratic Party and Populism:
Unable to defeat Populism, the Democratic Party joined forces with it. As the election of 1896 approached, the Democrats needed a new candidate to run for the presidency, and a way to combat the rise of Populism. The party’s National Nominating Convention in Chicago solved both these problems in one blow. When the ‘silverites’ won the debate on the floor of the convention, the Democratic Party adopted the cause of free silver into its programme. The convention then gave the presidential nomination to William Jennings Bryan
Some Populists felt betrayed and wanted to run their own candidate against Bryan, but that would simply have meant handing victory to the Republicans, so the Populists endorsed Bryan and the Democrats. In the 1896 election, Bryan was defeated, and the cause of free silver went down with him. Populism never really recovered its momentum and was ultimately swallowed up by the Democratic Party
The rise of the Republican Party and the election of 1896:
By 1890, the Republican Party was very different from the party of Abraham Lincoln. After the failure of Reconstruction, there were far fewer African-American voters and the South became a lost cause for the Republicans. Their main blocks of support came from big business and the urban workers who did well out of the rise of industrialisation. Republicans usually supported high tariffs and protectionist economics. (Democrats usually opposed them, but this could change according to circumstances)
There was a marked contrast in the campaigning style of the candidates who battled it out in 1896. William Jennings Bryan relied on his superb eloquence. He made numerous ‘whistle stop’ tours by train, making 600 speeches, mostly to enthusiastic crowds. His Biblical punch line demanding free silver and denouncing the gold standard was endlessly repeated: ‘You shall not press down upon the brow of labor, this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.’ The Republican candidate, William McKinley, did not need to make whirlwind tours; he had money instead. Behind his presidency was a modern political machine, oiled by millions of dollars and driven by a master political strategist, Mark Hanna
McKinley and Hanna were close political allies and had been planning his bid for the presidency for years. Hanna was a rich businessman, a battle-hardened politician who knew all about patronage and was a brilliant fundraiser. The McKinley campaign spent around $7 million (at 1896 values) and had more than a thousand volunteers sending letters to voters and contributors, especially in the key ‘battleground’ states from Ohio to Wisconsin
The 1896 election:
Apart from Mark Hanna’s slick campaigning methods, McKinley had other significant advantages. The Democratic Party was divided. The Eastern conservatives who had backed Grover Cleveland were lukewarm in supporting Bryan. Outside the south and west, people were suspicious about free silver and not easily convinced it would work. McKinley’s promises to introduce a high protective tariff and to keep the gold standard were better received than Bryan’s mixture of unorthodox economics and fundamentalist religion
McKinley won by 600,000 votes. The ‘turning point’ election of 1896 began a period of Republican dominance as the ‘natural party of government’. The close links between the Republicans and business underpinned a series of election victories up until to 1912. A matching consequence of 1896 was the continuing weakness of the Democrats. William Jennings Bryan was a charismatic political presence, but he symbolised the division between the anti-urban wing of the party and the ‘Bourbon Democrats’ who had backed Grover Cleveland. Bryan was to prove a serial loser: he was the defeated Democratic candidate in 1900, and again in 1908
The 1896 election showed the resilience of two-party politics. Populism withered away almost as rapidly as it had risen. By its success at the Democratic National Convention, the People’s Party lost its separate identity. By 1908 it had virtually ceased to exist and Populism became just one of many strands in the Democratic Party. Progressivism replaced Populism as the movement of reform. The ability of the main political parties to absorb new elements into a national coalition proved to be a lasting characteristic of American politics
The Republican presidency: McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt and Taft
William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft were allies in the same party, but there were significant differences between them, both personal and political. Even when they ran on the same campaign ticket (president and vice-president) in 1900, McKinley and Roosevelt disagreed on many issues. When he became president, Theodore Roosevelt was regarded with great suspicion by conservative Republican backers like Mark Hanna. Roosevelt and Taft were close political allies in 1908, but four years later the divisions between them split the Republican Party in two and handed the 1912 election to Woodrow Wilson and the Democrats
The presidency of William McKinley:
At McKinley’s inauguration in March 1897, Republican conservatism was riding high. The Republicans held the presidency and had large majorities in both the House and the Senate. For the first time ever, they had won the presidency without needing the black vote in the south. The Democrats were still weakened by internal divisions; Populism was a fading force. The economy was entering a period of exceptional growth. McKinley filled his administration with wealthy men and set out business-friendly policies, doing nothing to prevent the consolidation of business into ever-larger corporations
McKinley pleased his conservative backers by maintaining the protective tariff. The Dingley Tariff Act of 1897 pushed tariff rates to even higher levels. Like Grover Cleveland, McKinley was a strong believer in the gold standard.
This policy was strengthened by the Alaska-Yukon Gold Rush of 1897-99, which increased the amount of gold in circulation. In 1900 McKinley introduced the Currency Act, committing the US to maintain the gold standard. The potential problems caused by these policies were lessened by the general prosperity of the time, including rising farm prices
McKinley’s political position was strengthened by the Spanish-American War. McKinley himself was not particularly keen on an expansionist foreign policy, but a lot of Republicans were. McKinley was happy to bask in the glow of the military and naval successes in Cuba and the Pacific. For his re-election in 1900 he adopted a hero of the war, Theodore Roosevelt, as his vice-president. McKinley and Roosevelt were not a harmonious team. There were significant differences between them in age, personality, and political beliefs. But they were a strong electoral team, and they cruised to a comfortable victory over William Jennings Bryan
William McKinley seemed destined for a smooth and successful second term as president, but within six months he was dead. In September 1901 he arrived in Buffalo, in upstate New York, to attend the Pan-American Exposition, a celebration of American prosperity and industrial might. Visiting the Temple of Music on 6 September, McKinley was shot in the stomach by a young anarchist of Polish-German descent, Leon Czolgosz. The president’s life was not thought to be in danger and the public were told he was recovering well, but complications set in from the bullet lodged in his body. He died on 14 September, eight days after the shooting. Theodore Roosevelt became the youngest-ever American president, at the age of 42